地面视角

Q1 Social Sciences
Jaymelee J. Kim
{"title":"地面视角","authors":"Jaymelee J. Kim","doi":"10.3167/ARCS.2018.040110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While traditionally underrepresented in transitional justice studies, anthropological\nstudy of culture, ethnography, and processes can contribute valuable insight\ninto colonial bureaucracies and dynamics of power. This article uses an ethnographic\napproach and a colonial bureaucratic violence theoretical foundation to analyze negative\nperceptions of transitional justice at the ground level. Participants included facilitators,\ngovernment officials, nonprofit organizations, and Indigenous community\nmembers; research occurred during implementation of transitional justice (2011–2014) for a period of 12 months. Specifically, I argue that the relationship between\ntransitional justice and colonial bureaucratic violence encourages negative views of\ntransitional justice. Instead, ethnographic data first reveals that bureaucratic processes\nwithin transitional justice challenge Indigenous identities. Second, Indigenous survivors\nin British Columbia, Canada, largely view transitional justice on a continuum of\ncolonial bureaucratic violence. Using a colonial bureaucratic violence framework, this\narticle provides insight and nuance into perceptions of transitional justice at the local\nlevel.","PeriodicalId":36783,"journal":{"name":"Conflict and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives from the Ground\",\"authors\":\"Jaymelee J. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/ARCS.2018.040110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While traditionally underrepresented in transitional justice studies, anthropological\\nstudy of culture, ethnography, and processes can contribute valuable insight\\ninto colonial bureaucracies and dynamics of power. This article uses an ethnographic\\napproach and a colonial bureaucratic violence theoretical foundation to analyze negative\\nperceptions of transitional justice at the ground level. Participants included facilitators,\\ngovernment officials, nonprofit organizations, and Indigenous community\\nmembers; research occurred during implementation of transitional justice (2011–2014) for a period of 12 months. Specifically, I argue that the relationship between\\ntransitional justice and colonial bureaucratic violence encourages negative views of\\ntransitional justice. Instead, ethnographic data first reveals that bureaucratic processes\\nwithin transitional justice challenge Indigenous identities. Second, Indigenous survivors\\nin British Columbia, Canada, largely view transitional justice on a continuum of\\ncolonial bureaucratic violence. Using a colonial bureaucratic violence framework, this\\narticle provides insight and nuance into perceptions of transitional justice at the local\\nlevel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conflict and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conflict and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARCS.2018.040110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARCS.2018.040110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

虽然传统上在过渡时期司法研究中代表性不足,但对文化、人种学和过程的人类学研究可以为了解殖民官僚机构和权力动态提供有价值的见解。本文运用民族志的方法和殖民官僚暴力的理论基础来分析基层对过渡正义的负面看法。参与者包括辅导员、政府官员、非营利组织和土著社区成员;在实施过渡司法期间(2011-2014年)进行了为期12个月的研究。具体而言,我认为过渡时期司法与殖民官僚暴力之间的关系鼓励了对过渡时期司法的负面看法。相反,人种学数据首先揭示了转型司法中的官僚程序挑战了土著身份。其次,加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的土著幸存者在很大程度上把过渡时期的司法看作是殖民官僚暴力的连续体。利用殖民官僚暴力框架,本文提供了对地方一级过渡司法观念的见解和细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspectives from the Ground
While traditionally underrepresented in transitional justice studies, anthropological study of culture, ethnography, and processes can contribute valuable insight into colonial bureaucracies and dynamics of power. This article uses an ethnographic approach and a colonial bureaucratic violence theoretical foundation to analyze negative perceptions of transitional justice at the ground level. Participants included facilitators, government officials, nonprofit organizations, and Indigenous community members; research occurred during implementation of transitional justice (2011–2014) for a period of 12 months. Specifically, I argue that the relationship between transitional justice and colonial bureaucratic violence encourages negative views of transitional justice. Instead, ethnographic data first reveals that bureaucratic processes within transitional justice challenge Indigenous identities. Second, Indigenous survivors in British Columbia, Canada, largely view transitional justice on a continuum of colonial bureaucratic violence. Using a colonial bureaucratic violence framework, this article provides insight and nuance into perceptions of transitional justice at the local level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict and Society
Conflict and Society Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信