异教徒与信徒:英国宗教改革史

IF 0.1 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
P. Ayris
{"title":"异教徒与信徒:英国宗教改革史","authors":"P. Ayris","doi":"10.1080/14622459.2019.1616252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[ed] wide acceptance within the Lutheran church in Germany,’ went through sixty-eight editions in German by 1743, and was among the books studied in Spener’s first collegium pietatis in Frankfurt-am-Main. Such genetic links between English puritanism and German pietism are not sufficiently addressed. The second example is Robert von Friedeburg’s ‘The Rise of Natural Law in the Earlymodern Period.’ In this essay, the author transitions from a survey of natural law in the Reformation era to the work of Grotius, Hobbes, and Pufendorf, and then the subsequent eighteenth-century development. The development of natural law beginning with Grotius is interpreted through primary and secondary sources, but no attempt is made to understand how seventeenth-century contemporaries reacted to Grotius, Hobbes, and Pufendorf. But arguably the immediate reception of these authors is relevant to their interpretation as in some sense ‘modern’ or innovative relative to the larger tradition. To clarify more precisely the ‘breakthrough’ with respect to confessional theology (637), this essay would have benefited from the inclusion of such research as that of Merio Scattola, who discusses the differing reactions of Lutheran scholastic theologians to the work of Grotius and Pufendorf. The former was viewed by Lutherans as compatible with theological orthodoxy and the latter as a novator and theologically problematic. Overall, this handbook includes many fine essays by distinguished senior scholars that serve as reliable guides to further research. It is an excellent resource for students of early-modern theology.","PeriodicalId":41309,"journal":{"name":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","volume":"10 1","pages":"160 - 162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heretics and Believers: a history of the English Reformation\",\"authors\":\"P. Ayris\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14622459.2019.1616252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[ed] wide acceptance within the Lutheran church in Germany,’ went through sixty-eight editions in German by 1743, and was among the books studied in Spener’s first collegium pietatis in Frankfurt-am-Main. Such genetic links between English puritanism and German pietism are not sufficiently addressed. The second example is Robert von Friedeburg’s ‘The Rise of Natural Law in the Earlymodern Period.’ In this essay, the author transitions from a survey of natural law in the Reformation era to the work of Grotius, Hobbes, and Pufendorf, and then the subsequent eighteenth-century development. The development of natural law beginning with Grotius is interpreted through primary and secondary sources, but no attempt is made to understand how seventeenth-century contemporaries reacted to Grotius, Hobbes, and Pufendorf. But arguably the immediate reception of these authors is relevant to their interpretation as in some sense ‘modern’ or innovative relative to the larger tradition. To clarify more precisely the ‘breakthrough’ with respect to confessional theology (637), this essay would have benefited from the inclusion of such research as that of Merio Scattola, who discusses the differing reactions of Lutheran scholastic theologians to the work of Grotius and Pufendorf. The former was viewed by Lutherans as compatible with theological orthodoxy and the latter as a novator and theologically problematic. Overall, this handbook includes many fine essays by distinguished senior scholars that serve as reliable guides to further research. It is an excellent resource for students of early-modern theology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"160 - 162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2019.1616252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14622459.2019.1616252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在德国的路德教会中被广泛接受,到1743年已经出版了68个德语版本,是斯宾纳在美因河畔法兰克福的第一所pietatis学院研究的书籍之一。英国清教主义和德国虔诚主义之间的这种遗传联系没有得到充分的解决。第二个例子是罗伯特·冯·弗里德堡的《近代早期自然法的兴起》。在这篇文章中,作者从对宗教改革时期自然法的调查过渡到格劳秀斯、霍布斯和普芬多夫的工作,然后是随后的18世纪的发展。从格劳秀斯开始的自然法的发展是通过第一手和第二手的资料来解释的,但没有尝试去理解17世纪的同时代人对格劳秀斯、霍布斯和普芬多夫的反应。但可以说,这些作者的直接接受与他们的解释有关,在某种意义上,与更大的传统相比,他们是“现代的”或创新的。为了更准确地澄清关于认信神学的“突破”(637),本文将受益于Merio Scattola的研究,他讨论了路德会经院神学家对格劳秀斯和普芬多夫的工作的不同反应。前者被路德会视为与神学正统相容,后者则是革新者,在神学上有问题。总的来说,这本手册包括许多优秀的论文由杰出的资深学者,作为可靠的指导,进一步的研究。对于研究早期现代神学的学生来说,这是一个极好的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heretics and Believers: a history of the English Reformation
[ed] wide acceptance within the Lutheran church in Germany,’ went through sixty-eight editions in German by 1743, and was among the books studied in Spener’s first collegium pietatis in Frankfurt-am-Main. Such genetic links between English puritanism and German pietism are not sufficiently addressed. The second example is Robert von Friedeburg’s ‘The Rise of Natural Law in the Earlymodern Period.’ In this essay, the author transitions from a survey of natural law in the Reformation era to the work of Grotius, Hobbes, and Pufendorf, and then the subsequent eighteenth-century development. The development of natural law beginning with Grotius is interpreted through primary and secondary sources, but no attempt is made to understand how seventeenth-century contemporaries reacted to Grotius, Hobbes, and Pufendorf. But arguably the immediate reception of these authors is relevant to their interpretation as in some sense ‘modern’ or innovative relative to the larger tradition. To clarify more precisely the ‘breakthrough’ with respect to confessional theology (637), this essay would have benefited from the inclusion of such research as that of Merio Scattola, who discusses the differing reactions of Lutheran scholastic theologians to the work of Grotius and Pufendorf. The former was viewed by Lutherans as compatible with theological orthodoxy and the latter as a novator and theologically problematic. Overall, this handbook includes many fine essays by distinguished senior scholars that serve as reliable guides to further research. It is an excellent resource for students of early-modern theology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW
REFORMATION & RENAISSANCE REVIEW MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信