用环境绩效指标评价俄罗斯地区社会生态发展水平的可行性研究

IF 3.4 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Z. Mingaleva, I. Nikitina, I. Kruglova
{"title":"用环境绩效指标评价俄罗斯地区社会生态发展水平的可行性研究","authors":"Z. Mingaleva, I. Nikitina, I. Kruglova","doi":"10.31107/2075-1990-2023-4-98-111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Investment decisions by many private and institutional investors are made taking into account the information (current estimates, forecasts, trends) contained in various country ratings regularly published by leading international financial and regulatory organizations (IMF, IBRD, UN), which allows investors to assess the level of risk and return on investment in various projects in these countries. The article evaluates the Environmental Performance Index (EPI), the most common in international studies, from the point of view of its use as a comprehensive tool for comparative analysis and an indicator for assessing the success of achieving the goals of sustainable social and environmental development of Russian regions. Purpose: Analysis of the feasibility of using EPI and its individual elements as part of an integrated approach to assessing the effectiveness of social and environmental development of Russia and its regions. Results: The authors reviewed the transformation of the methodology for calculating EPI over the entire period of its compilation; analyzed the dynamics of indicators, directions and blocks that make up the Index; assessed their adequacy to the geographical and sectoral features of social and environmental development. Conclusions: An extremely high level of politicization of the Index and inconsistency of its calculation methodology with the real conditions of Russia’s economic development were revealed. The inexpediency of its use in the present conditions to assess the social and environmental development of Russian regions, to build a rating of their sustainable development, to develop criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of environmental programs and projects, including in the field of green and environmental investments, was proved.","PeriodicalId":48062,"journal":{"name":"Financial Analysts Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Feasibility of Using the Environmental Performance Index to Assess the Level of Socio-ecological Development of Russian Regions\",\"authors\":\"Z. Mingaleva, I. Nikitina, I. Kruglova\",\"doi\":\"10.31107/2075-1990-2023-4-98-111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Investment decisions by many private and institutional investors are made taking into account the information (current estimates, forecasts, trends) contained in various country ratings regularly published by leading international financial and regulatory organizations (IMF, IBRD, UN), which allows investors to assess the level of risk and return on investment in various projects in these countries. The article evaluates the Environmental Performance Index (EPI), the most common in international studies, from the point of view of its use as a comprehensive tool for comparative analysis and an indicator for assessing the success of achieving the goals of sustainable social and environmental development of Russian regions. Purpose: Analysis of the feasibility of using EPI and its individual elements as part of an integrated approach to assessing the effectiveness of social and environmental development of Russia and its regions. Results: The authors reviewed the transformation of the methodology for calculating EPI over the entire period of its compilation; analyzed the dynamics of indicators, directions and blocks that make up the Index; assessed their adequacy to the geographical and sectoral features of social and environmental development. Conclusions: An extremely high level of politicization of the Index and inconsistency of its calculation methodology with the real conditions of Russia’s economic development were revealed. The inexpediency of its use in the present conditions to assess the social and environmental development of Russian regions, to build a rating of their sustainable development, to develop criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of environmental programs and projects, including in the field of green and environmental investments, was proved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Analysts Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Analysts Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-4-98-111\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Analysts Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-4-98-111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:许多私人和机构投资者的投资决策考虑了主要国际金融和监管组织(国际货币基金组织、国际复兴开发银行、联合国)定期发布的各种国家评级中包含的信息(当前估计、预测和趋势),这些信息使投资者能够评估这些国家各种项目的风险水平和投资回报。本文对国际研究中最常见的环境绩效指数(EPI)进行了评价,从其作为比较分析的综合工具和评估俄罗斯地区实现可持续社会和环境发展目标是否成功的指标的角度出发。目的:分析利用扩大投资指数及其个别要素作为评估俄罗斯及其各地区社会和环境发展有效性的综合办法的一部分的可行性。结果:作者回顾了EPI计算方法在整个编制期间的转变;分析了构成指数的指标、方向和板块的动态;评估其是否符合社会和环境发展的地理和部门特点。结论:该指数的政治化程度极高,其计算方法与俄罗斯经济发展的实际情况不一致。事实证明,在目前条件下,将其用于评估俄罗斯各地区的社会和环境发展、建立其可持续发展评级、制定评估环境计划和项目(包括绿色和环境投资领域)有效性的标准是不合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Feasibility of Using the Environmental Performance Index to Assess the Level of Socio-ecological Development of Russian Regions
Introduction: Investment decisions by many private and institutional investors are made taking into account the information (current estimates, forecasts, trends) contained in various country ratings regularly published by leading international financial and regulatory organizations (IMF, IBRD, UN), which allows investors to assess the level of risk and return on investment in various projects in these countries. The article evaluates the Environmental Performance Index (EPI), the most common in international studies, from the point of view of its use as a comprehensive tool for comparative analysis and an indicator for assessing the success of achieving the goals of sustainable social and environmental development of Russian regions. Purpose: Analysis of the feasibility of using EPI and its individual elements as part of an integrated approach to assessing the effectiveness of social and environmental development of Russia and its regions. Results: The authors reviewed the transformation of the methodology for calculating EPI over the entire period of its compilation; analyzed the dynamics of indicators, directions and blocks that make up the Index; assessed their adequacy to the geographical and sectoral features of social and environmental development. Conclusions: An extremely high level of politicization of the Index and inconsistency of its calculation methodology with the real conditions of Russia’s economic development were revealed. The inexpediency of its use in the present conditions to assess the social and environmental development of Russian regions, to build a rating of their sustainable development, to develop criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of environmental programs and projects, including in the field of green and environmental investments, was proved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Financial Analysts Journal
Financial Analysts Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Financial Analysts Journal aims to be the leading practitioner journal in the investment management community by advancing the knowledge and understanding of the practice of investment management through the publication of rigorous, peer-reviewed, practitioner-relevant research from leading academics and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信