Toward Deep Diversion for Waterflooding and EOR: From Representative Delayed Gelation to Practical Field-Trial Design

Conformance control via near-wellbore mechanical and chemical treatments is well established. However, for extreme heterogeneities, effective conformance control mandates deep treatments. Such deep treatments or diversion would sustain sweep enhancement far from wells, deep into the reservoir. Deep diversion is even more mandatory for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) to assure the expensive injectants optimally contact the remaining oil. In this paper, we comprehensively present efforts to research, develop, and trial a crosslinked-gel system for deep diversion. We started by reviewing conformance control options including crosslinked systems. The review supported the immaturity of deep conformance control. Various gel-based solutions, especially preformed particle gels (PPGs) and colloidal dispersed gels (CDGs), were proposed; however, diversion effects were not clearly illustrated. For crosslinked-gels, all systems exhibited fast gelation, something suitable for near-wellbore treatments. We then studied the key crosslinked systems. We characterized their behavior using rheometry, bottle tests, and single-phase corefloods. We assessed their potential through oil-displacement corefloods in artificially fractured cores with and without in-situ imaging. In-house studies, on key gel systems demonstrated the feasibility of gels to affect diversion and enhance recovery but corroborated the extreme challenge to design systems with delayed gelation. To assure representative gelation, we developed, and utilized a continuous bi-directional injection protocol to assess gelation times in-situ. From there, we collaboratively developed, and characterized a unique delayed-gelation formulation. The collaborative study addressed this challenge where systems with delayed gelation were developed. In-situ gelation time estimation confirmed this delayed gelation capacity. Further corefloods addressed the key uncertainties including injectivity losses, limited propagation, and ineffective blockage. Simulations were performed to assess the process feasibility.The simulation studies supported the utility of deep diversion treatments. Simulation also guided the initial design of a trial. We focused on the design of a practical field trial.For further derisking, the first trial was optimized to serve as a practical proof-of-concept. Taking into account economics, success measurement, flow assurance, and depth of placement, we diverged from a trial where we observe deep diversion (and infer delayed gelation and effective blockage) then converged into a trial where we infer deep diversion (by observing delayed gelation and effective blockage). With that, we screened candidates with a clear hierarchy of screening criteria. Through this program, and for the first-time in the industry, we demonstrate the potential utility and feasibility of a crosslinked-gel system for deep diversion applications. This potential is supported by comprehensive experimentation including novel in-situ estimation of gelation times. Finally, a consistent workflow to design a practical field trial is laid out. This, in terms of design considerations and hierarchal screening, is believed to be of extreme value to the practicing reservoir engineers.