新型冠状病毒感染急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者有创机械通气的相关问题

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
O. Loskutov, I. Kuchynska, S. Nedashkivskyi, O. Demchenko
{"title":"新型冠状病毒感染急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者有创机械通气的相关问题","authors":"O. Loskutov, I. Kuchynska, S. Nedashkivskyi, O. Demchenko","doi":"10.25284/2519-2078.2(95).2021.238291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mortality among patients with severe pneumonia and / or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 infection, who underwent mechanical ventilation (MV), is characterized by a fairly high frequency. However, despite the large number of patients receiving appropriate treatment, the question of choosing the optimal ventilation parameters remains poorly understood. In our article, we reviewed the available literature data on the indications for mechanical ventilation, parameters of MV, the need for prone-positioning of patients with ARDS caused by COVID-19 infection in intensive care units to identify unresolved issues.Despite the large number of publications about respiratory support in patients with severe coronavirus infection, there are only general principles regarding the indications for switching to invasive ventilation. Most authors identified the following clinical situations: progression of hypoxemia and / or respiratory failure but with constant oxygen support with increasing percentage of oxygen in the respiratory mixture, use of high-flow cannula or non-invasive ventilation for 1 hour without improvement; persistent hypercapnia, multiorgan failure, coma, high risk of aspiration, hemodynamic instability.According to most of the studies analyzed, the main components of the ventilation strategy should be based on the principles of pulmonary protective ventilation and include the use of low tidal volumes (Vt = 4-8 ml / kg of ideal body weight) and ventilation with plateau pressure Pplat <30 cm H2O (plateau pressure - air pressure measured after an inspiratory pause of 0.5 s). At the same time, many authors recommend using prone position and high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared to low levels in patients with ARDS on the background of COVID-19.The approach to invasive mechanical ventilation in ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 still requires further research and answers to a number of questions.","PeriodicalId":7735,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASPECTS OF INVASIVE MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN PATIENTS WITH ARDS CAUSED BY COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"O. Loskutov, I. Kuchynska, S. Nedashkivskyi, O. Demchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.25284/2519-2078.2(95).2021.238291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mortality among patients with severe pneumonia and / or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 infection, who underwent mechanical ventilation (MV), is characterized by a fairly high frequency. However, despite the large number of patients receiving appropriate treatment, the question of choosing the optimal ventilation parameters remains poorly understood. In our article, we reviewed the available literature data on the indications for mechanical ventilation, parameters of MV, the need for prone-positioning of patients with ARDS caused by COVID-19 infection in intensive care units to identify unresolved issues.Despite the large number of publications about respiratory support in patients with severe coronavirus infection, there are only general principles regarding the indications for switching to invasive ventilation. Most authors identified the following clinical situations: progression of hypoxemia and / or respiratory failure but with constant oxygen support with increasing percentage of oxygen in the respiratory mixture, use of high-flow cannula or non-invasive ventilation for 1 hour without improvement; persistent hypercapnia, multiorgan failure, coma, high risk of aspiration, hemodynamic instability.According to most of the studies analyzed, the main components of the ventilation strategy should be based on the principles of pulmonary protective ventilation and include the use of low tidal volumes (Vt = 4-8 ml / kg of ideal body weight) and ventilation with plateau pressure Pplat <30 cm H2O (plateau pressure - air pressure measured after an inspiratory pause of 0.5 s). At the same time, many authors recommend using prone position and high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared to low levels in patients with ARDS on the background of COVID-19.The approach to invasive mechanical ventilation in ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 still requires further research and answers to a number of questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.2(95).2021.238291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.2(95).2021.238291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

因COVID-19感染而发生严重肺炎和/或急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)并接受机械通气(MV)的患者的死亡率具有相当高的频率。然而,尽管大量患者接受了适当的治疗,但选择最佳通气参数的问题仍然知之甚少。在我们的文章中,我们回顾了现有的文献资料,包括机械通气的适应症、MV参数、重症监护病房COVID-19感染的ARDS患者需要俯卧位等,以找出尚未解决的问题。尽管有大量关于严重冠状病毒感染患者呼吸支持的出版物,但对于切换到有创通气的适应症,只有一般原则。大多数作者确定了以下临床情况:低氧血症和/或呼吸衰竭进展,但持续供氧支持,呼吸混合物中氧气的百分比增加,使用高流量插管或无创通气1小时无改善;持续性高碳酸血症,多器官功能衰竭,昏迷,高危误吸,血流动力学不稳定。根据分析的大多数研究,通气策略的主要组成部分应以肺保护性通气原则为基础,包括使用低潮气量(Vt = 4-8 ml / kg理想体重)和平台压力Pplat <30 cm H2O(平台压力-吸气暂停0.5 s后测量的空气压力)的通气。许多作者建议在COVID-19背景下的ARDS患者使用俯卧位和高水平的呼气末正压(PEEP),而不是低水平。SARS-CoV-2所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的有创机械通气方法仍需进一步研究和解答一些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ASPECTS OF INVASIVE MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN PATIENTS WITH ARDS CAUSED BY COVID-19
Mortality among patients with severe pneumonia and / or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 infection, who underwent mechanical ventilation (MV), is characterized by a fairly high frequency. However, despite the large number of patients receiving appropriate treatment, the question of choosing the optimal ventilation parameters remains poorly understood. In our article, we reviewed the available literature data on the indications for mechanical ventilation, parameters of MV, the need for prone-positioning of patients with ARDS caused by COVID-19 infection in intensive care units to identify unresolved issues.Despite the large number of publications about respiratory support in patients with severe coronavirus infection, there are only general principles regarding the indications for switching to invasive ventilation. Most authors identified the following clinical situations: progression of hypoxemia and / or respiratory failure but with constant oxygen support with increasing percentage of oxygen in the respiratory mixture, use of high-flow cannula or non-invasive ventilation for 1 hour without improvement; persistent hypercapnia, multiorgan failure, coma, high risk of aspiration, hemodynamic instability.According to most of the studies analyzed, the main components of the ventilation strategy should be based on the principles of pulmonary protective ventilation and include the use of low tidal volumes (Vt = 4-8 ml / kg of ideal body weight) and ventilation with plateau pressure Pplat <30 cm H2O (plateau pressure - air pressure measured after an inspiratory pause of 0.5 s). At the same time, many authors recommend using prone position and high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared to low levels in patients with ARDS on the background of COVID-19.The approach to invasive mechanical ventilation in ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 still requires further research and answers to a number of questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信