西德尼·胡克的《实用主义反共:以民主为方法的承诺》

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Courtney Ferriter
{"title":"西德尼·胡克的《实用主义反共:以民主为方法的承诺》","authors":"Courtney Ferriter","doi":"10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.33.1.0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In recent years, opposition to Communism has emerged as Sidney Hook's central philosophical legacy in the eyes of scholars and historians, who tend to ignore all of Hook's pre-Cold War philosophical contributions. Furthermore, critics who treat Hook's anti-Communism often accuse him of abandoning pragmatism for dogmatism in his later career. In this essay, I argue that Hook's long-standing fight against Communism should be understood as an unwavering application of the democratic method in line with his mentor John Dewey's understanding of pragmatism as well as the commitment to scientific empiricism espoused by earlier pragmatists C. S. Peirce and William James.","PeriodicalId":37095,"journal":{"name":"Education and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sidney Hook's Pragmatic Anti-Communism: Commitment to Democracy as Method\",\"authors\":\"Courtney Ferriter\",\"doi\":\"10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.33.1.0089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In recent years, opposition to Communism has emerged as Sidney Hook's central philosophical legacy in the eyes of scholars and historians, who tend to ignore all of Hook's pre-Cold War philosophical contributions. Furthermore, critics who treat Hook's anti-Communism often accuse him of abandoning pragmatism for dogmatism in his later career. In this essay, I argue that Hook's long-standing fight against Communism should be understood as an unwavering application of the democratic method in line with his mentor John Dewey's understanding of pragmatism as well as the commitment to scientific empiricism espoused by earlier pragmatists C. S. Peirce and William James.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.33.1.0089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.33.1.0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:近年来,在学者和历史学家的眼中,反对共产主义已经成为西德尼·胡克的核心哲学遗产,他们往往忽视了胡克在冷战前的所有哲学贡献。此外,批评胡克反共产主义的人经常指责他在后来的职业生涯中放弃实用主义而转向教条主义。在这篇文章中,我认为胡克与共产主义的长期斗争应该被理解为民主方法的坚定不移的应用,这与他的导师约翰·杜威对实用主义的理解以及早期实用主义者c.s.皮尔斯和威廉·詹姆斯所支持的对科学经验主义的承诺是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sidney Hook's Pragmatic Anti-Communism: Commitment to Democracy as Method
Abstract:In recent years, opposition to Communism has emerged as Sidney Hook's central philosophical legacy in the eyes of scholars and historians, who tend to ignore all of Hook's pre-Cold War philosophical contributions. Furthermore, critics who treat Hook's anti-Communism often accuse him of abandoning pragmatism for dogmatism in his later career. In this essay, I argue that Hook's long-standing fight against Communism should be understood as an unwavering application of the democratic method in line with his mentor John Dewey's understanding of pragmatism as well as the commitment to scientific empiricism espoused by earlier pragmatists C. S. Peirce and William James.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Culture
Education and Culture Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信