基于RNA-seq技术的edgeR和DESeq2方法在植物实验中的应用

Grażyna Niedziela, Alicja Szabelska-Beręsewicz, J. Zyprych-Walczak, M. Graczyk
{"title":"基于RNA-seq技术的edgeR和DESeq2方法在植物实验中的应用","authors":"Grażyna Niedziela, Alicja Szabelska-Beręsewicz, J. Zyprych-Walczak, M. Graczyk","doi":"10.2478/bile-2022-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary We compared two of the most common methods for differential expression analysis in the RNA-seq field: edgeR and DESeq2. We evaluated these methods based on four real RNA-seq plant datasets. The results indicate that there is a large number of joint differentially expressed genes between the two methods. However, depending on the research goal and the preparation of an experiment, different approaches to statistical analysis and interpretation of the results can be suggested. We focus on answering the question: what workflow should be used in the statistical analysis of the datasets under consideration to minimize the number of falsely identified differentially expressed genes?","PeriodicalId":8933,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of edgeR and DESeq2 methods in plant experiments based on RNA-seq technology\",\"authors\":\"Grażyna Niedziela, Alicja Szabelska-Beręsewicz, J. Zyprych-Walczak, M. Graczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/bile-2022-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary We compared two of the most common methods for differential expression analysis in the RNA-seq field: edgeR and DESeq2. We evaluated these methods based on four real RNA-seq plant datasets. The results indicate that there is a large number of joint differentially expressed genes between the two methods. However, depending on the research goal and the preparation of an experiment, different approaches to statistical analysis and interpretation of the results can be suggested. We focus on answering the question: what workflow should be used in the statistical analysis of the datasets under consideration to minimize the number of falsely identified differentially expressed genes?\",\"PeriodicalId\":8933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biometrical Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biometrical Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2022-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bile-2022-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们比较了RNA-seq领域中最常用的两种差异表达分析方法:edgeR和DESeq2。我们基于四个真实的RNA-seq植物数据集评估了这些方法。结果表明,两种方法之间存在大量的联合差异表达基因。然而,根据研究目标和实验准备,可以建议不同的统计分析和解释结果的方法。我们专注于回答这个问题:在考虑的数据集的统计分析中应该使用什么工作流程来最小化错误识别的差异表达基因的数量?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of edgeR and DESeq2 methods in plant experiments based on RNA-seq technology
Summary We compared two of the most common methods for differential expression analysis in the RNA-seq field: edgeR and DESeq2. We evaluated these methods based on four real RNA-seq plant datasets. The results indicate that there is a large number of joint differentially expressed genes between the two methods. However, depending on the research goal and the preparation of an experiment, different approaches to statistical analysis and interpretation of the results can be suggested. We focus on answering the question: what workflow should be used in the statistical analysis of the datasets under consideration to minimize the number of falsely identified differentially expressed genes?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信