基于机器学习方法的电缆测井粒度自动估计的线性和非线性控制

F. Anifowose, S. Alshahrani, M. Mezghani
{"title":"基于机器学习方法的电缆测井粒度自动估计的线性和非线性控制","authors":"F. Anifowose, S. Alshahrani, M. Mezghani","doi":"10.2118/205802-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Wireline logs have been utilized to indirectly estimate various reservoir properties, such as porosity, permeability, saturation, cementation factor, and lithology. Attempts have been made to correlate Gamma-ray, density, neutron, spontaneous potential, and resistivity logs with lithology. The current approach to estimate grain size, the traditional core description, is time-consuming, labor-intensive, qualitative, and subjective. An alternative approach is essential given the utility of grain size in petrophysical characterization and identification of depositional environments.\n This paper proposes to fill the gap by studying the linear and nonlinear influences of wireline logs on reservoir rock grain size. We used the observed influences to develop and optimize respective linear and machine learning models to estimate reservoir rock grain size for a new well or targeted reservoir sections. The linear models comprised logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis while the machine learning method is random forest (RF). We will present the preliminary results comparing the linear and machine learning methods. We used anonymized wireline and archival core description datasets from nine wells in a clastic reservoir. Seven wells were used to train the models and the remaining two to test their classification performance. The grain size-types range from clay to granules. While sedimentologists have used gamma-ray logs to guide grain size qualification, the RF model recommended sonic, neutron, and density logs as having the most significant grain size in the nonlinear domain.\n The comparative results of the models' performance comparison showed that considering the subjectivity and bias associated with the visual core description approach, the RF model gave up to an 89% correct classification rate. This suggested looking beyond the linear influences of the wireline logs on reservoir rock grain size. The apparent relative stability of the RF model compared to the linear ones also confirms the feasibility of the machine learning approach.\n This is an acceptable and promising result. Future research will focus on conducting more rigorous quality checks on the grain size data, possibly introduce more heterogeneity, and explore more advanced algorithms. This will help to address the uncertainty in the grain size data more effectively and improve the models performance. The outcome of this study will reduce the limitations in the traditional core description and may eventually reduce the need for extensive core description processes.","PeriodicalId":11052,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linear and Nonlinear Controls of Wireline Logs on Automated Grain Size Estimation Using Machine Learning Approach\",\"authors\":\"F. Anifowose, S. Alshahrani, M. Mezghani\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/205802-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Wireline logs have been utilized to indirectly estimate various reservoir properties, such as porosity, permeability, saturation, cementation factor, and lithology. Attempts have been made to correlate Gamma-ray, density, neutron, spontaneous potential, and resistivity logs with lithology. The current approach to estimate grain size, the traditional core description, is time-consuming, labor-intensive, qualitative, and subjective. An alternative approach is essential given the utility of grain size in petrophysical characterization and identification of depositional environments.\\n This paper proposes to fill the gap by studying the linear and nonlinear influences of wireline logs on reservoir rock grain size. We used the observed influences to develop and optimize respective linear and machine learning models to estimate reservoir rock grain size for a new well or targeted reservoir sections. The linear models comprised logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis while the machine learning method is random forest (RF). We will present the preliminary results comparing the linear and machine learning methods. We used anonymized wireline and archival core description datasets from nine wells in a clastic reservoir. Seven wells were used to train the models and the remaining two to test their classification performance. The grain size-types range from clay to granules. While sedimentologists have used gamma-ray logs to guide grain size qualification, the RF model recommended sonic, neutron, and density logs as having the most significant grain size in the nonlinear domain.\\n The comparative results of the models' performance comparison showed that considering the subjectivity and bias associated with the visual core description approach, the RF model gave up to an 89% correct classification rate. This suggested looking beyond the linear influences of the wireline logs on reservoir rock grain size. The apparent relative stability of the RF model compared to the linear ones also confirms the feasibility of the machine learning approach.\\n This is an acceptable and promising result. Future research will focus on conducting more rigorous quality checks on the grain size data, possibly introduce more heterogeneity, and explore more advanced algorithms. This will help to address the uncertainty in the grain size data more effectively and improve the models performance. The outcome of this study will reduce the limitations in the traditional core description and may eventually reduce the need for extensive core description processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/205802-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205802-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电缆测井已被用于间接估计各种储层性质,如孔隙度、渗透率、饱和度、胶结系数和岩性。人们尝试将伽马射线、密度、中子、自然电位和电阻率测井与岩性联系起来。目前估计颗粒大小的方法,即传统的岩心描述,是耗时、劳动密集、定性和主观的。考虑到颗粒尺寸在岩石物理表征和沉积环境识别中的实用性,另一种方法是必不可少的。本文提出通过研究电缆测井对储层岩石粒度的线性和非线性影响来填补这一空白。我们利用观察到的影响来开发和优化各自的线性和机器学习模型,以估计新井或目标油藏段的油藏岩石粒度。线性模型包括逻辑回归和线性判别分析,机器学习方法是随机森林。我们将展示比较线性和机器学习方法的初步结果。我们使用了来自碎屑储层9口井的匿名电缆和存档岩心描述数据集。7口井用于训练模型,其余2口井用于测试其分类性能。颗粒大小类型从粘土到颗粒不等。虽然沉积学家使用伽马射线测井来指导粒度鉴定,但RF模型推荐声波、中子和密度测井在非线性领域具有最重要的粒度。模型的性能比较结果表明,考虑到视觉核心描述方法的主观性和偏差,RF模型的分类正确率达到89%。这表明,电缆测井对储层岩石粒度的线性影响并不局限于此。与线性模型相比,射频模型的明显相对稳定性也证实了机器学习方法的可行性。这是一个可以接受的、有希望的结果。未来的研究将集中在对粒度数据进行更严格的质量检查,可能引入更多的异质性,并探索更先进的算法。这将有助于更有效地解决粒度数据中的不确定性,提高模型的性能。本研究的结果将减少传统岩心描述的局限性,并可能最终减少对广泛岩心描述过程的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linear and Nonlinear Controls of Wireline Logs on Automated Grain Size Estimation Using Machine Learning Approach
Wireline logs have been utilized to indirectly estimate various reservoir properties, such as porosity, permeability, saturation, cementation factor, and lithology. Attempts have been made to correlate Gamma-ray, density, neutron, spontaneous potential, and resistivity logs with lithology. The current approach to estimate grain size, the traditional core description, is time-consuming, labor-intensive, qualitative, and subjective. An alternative approach is essential given the utility of grain size in petrophysical characterization and identification of depositional environments. This paper proposes to fill the gap by studying the linear and nonlinear influences of wireline logs on reservoir rock grain size. We used the observed influences to develop and optimize respective linear and machine learning models to estimate reservoir rock grain size for a new well or targeted reservoir sections. The linear models comprised logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis while the machine learning method is random forest (RF). We will present the preliminary results comparing the linear and machine learning methods. We used anonymized wireline and archival core description datasets from nine wells in a clastic reservoir. Seven wells were used to train the models and the remaining two to test their classification performance. The grain size-types range from clay to granules. While sedimentologists have used gamma-ray logs to guide grain size qualification, the RF model recommended sonic, neutron, and density logs as having the most significant grain size in the nonlinear domain. The comparative results of the models' performance comparison showed that considering the subjectivity and bias associated with the visual core description approach, the RF model gave up to an 89% correct classification rate. This suggested looking beyond the linear influences of the wireline logs on reservoir rock grain size. The apparent relative stability of the RF model compared to the linear ones also confirms the feasibility of the machine learning approach. This is an acceptable and promising result. Future research will focus on conducting more rigorous quality checks on the grain size data, possibly introduce more heterogeneity, and explore more advanced algorithms. This will help to address the uncertainty in the grain size data more effectively and improve the models performance. The outcome of this study will reduce the limitations in the traditional core description and may eventually reduce the need for extensive core description processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信