论耶稣基督是创造的中保

E. Conradie
{"title":"论耶稣基督是创造的中保","authors":"E. Conradie","doi":"10.5952/54-0-347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution offers reflection on two of Dirkie Smit’s\n conversation partners, namely Herman Bavinck and Karl Barth. It notes that both are\n deeply Trinitarian theologians, but also that such a Trinitarian approach has to\n address a number of underlying difficulties with respect to the work of the Father,\n Son and Holy Spirit. On this basis the distinct positions of Bavinck and Barth on\n the relationship between Christ and creation is explored. Both would confirm that\n Jesus Christ is the “Mediator of creation” but adopt different approaches in this\n regard. Such underlying differences are explored and highlighted with the help of GC\n Berkouwer’s attempt to mediate between these approaches. The essay concludes with\n the observation that Smit’s emphasis on the centrality of the resurrection may\n suggest a critical correction to discourse on “Christ and creation”.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Jesus Christ as Mediator of creation\",\"authors\":\"E. Conradie\",\"doi\":\"10.5952/54-0-347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution offers reflection on two of Dirkie Smit’s\\n conversation partners, namely Herman Bavinck and Karl Barth. It notes that both are\\n deeply Trinitarian theologians, but also that such a Trinitarian approach has to\\n address a number of underlying difficulties with respect to the work of the Father,\\n Son and Holy Spirit. On this basis the distinct positions of Bavinck and Barth on\\n the relationship between Christ and creation is explored. Both would confirm that\\n Jesus Christ is the “Mediator of creation” but adopt different approaches in this\\n regard. Such underlying differences are explored and highlighted with the help of GC\\n Berkouwer’s attempt to mediate between these approaches. The essay concludes with\\n the observation that Smit’s emphasis on the centrality of the resurrection may\\n suggest a critical correction to discourse on “Christ and creation”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这篇文章反映了Dirkie Smit的两个谈话伙伴,即Herman Bavinck和Karl Barth。它指出,他们都是深刻的三位一体神学家,但也指出,这种三位一体的方法必须解决一些关于圣父、圣子和圣灵工作的潜在困难。在此基础上,探讨了巴文克和巴特在基督与创造的关系上的不同立场。两者都确认耶稣基督是“创造的中保”,但在这方面采取不同的方法。在GC Berkouwer试图在这些方法之间进行调解的帮助下,这些潜在的差异被探索和强调。这篇文章的结论是,斯密特对复活的中心地位的强调可能暗示了对“基督与创造”话语的批判性纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Jesus Christ as Mediator of creation
This contribution offers reflection on two of Dirkie Smit’s conversation partners, namely Herman Bavinck and Karl Barth. It notes that both are deeply Trinitarian theologians, but also that such a Trinitarian approach has to address a number of underlying difficulties with respect to the work of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. On this basis the distinct positions of Bavinck and Barth on the relationship between Christ and creation is explored. Both would confirm that Jesus Christ is the “Mediator of creation” but adopt different approaches in this regard. Such underlying differences are explored and highlighted with the help of GC Berkouwer’s attempt to mediate between these approaches. The essay concludes with the observation that Smit’s emphasis on the centrality of the resurrection may suggest a critical correction to discourse on “Christ and creation”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信