卡拉帕尼过境:从印度的角度重新审视19世纪的移民

IF 0.5 Q3 AREA STUDIES
M. Pandurang
{"title":"卡拉帕尼过境:从印度的角度重新审视19世纪的移民","authors":"M. Pandurang","doi":"10.1080/19438192.2022.2136125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"have helped us understand how PIOs in the West constitute one of the thriving communities. The third section focuses on the global dimensions of political integration. The first chapter focuses on the ideological hybridity between what the author calls ‘Diasporic Hindutva’ and radical right in the USA and UK. The next chapter focuses on sending state strategies to mobilise its diaspora. It studies the Overseas Citizenship of Indiaa quasi-citizenship offered by the Government of India (GOI) to PIOs to inculcate a sense of indebtedness and, in the process, shape the contours of belonging. The last chapter in this section focuses on differences within the Indo-Caribbean ethnic group and its impact on political integration. The chapter compares Trinidad, Guyana, and Suriname to argue that the degree of ethnic loyalty and level of integration varies significantly among them and attributes the same to political history, colonial background, and even natural resources/geographical factors. The analysis of the support for ‘right’ policies among ‘Diasporic Hindutva’ would have benefitted by examining whether supporting ‘right’ could be seen as a way to navigate inclusion/ integration in the host society marked by racial hierarchy. A comparison with the Jewish diaspora, also regarded as successful, could have further enriched the chapter. The second chapter’s analysis regarding India’s overseas citizenship could have benefitted by elaborating on how through these strategies, the scalar hierarchy of state power that gets reflected beyond the territorial boundary defines belonging for its diasporic population. The last chapter, like the previous chapters, restricts it to the respective national social field. An interrogation of whether the intensity of exchange/contact with their homeland influences group solidarity and their respective integration strategies cum level of integration would have been insightful. Next, the proliferation of PIOs globally marks an expansion in India’s Kin-Statesa theme that this volume doesn’t discuss much. However, as the recent turn of events from Canada to the UK shows, mobilising for homeland issues in the host countries by PIOs could have implications for Indian foreign policy, thereby complicating the bilateral relationship. To conclude, the book’s focus on the groupist integration of PIOs challenges the dominant individual-centric assimilationist paradigm prevalent in western society that equates society and the state. The book has successfully managed to question the melting pot paradigm that requires absolute assimilation to the host state society and views ethnicity and transnational ties as impediments to successful integration. Therefore, this book offers an interesting read to anyone interested in navigating the complexities of the political integration of immigrant communities in their host society.","PeriodicalId":42548,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Diaspora","volume":"6 1","pages":"272 - 275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kala Pani crossings: revisiting 19th century migration from India’s perspective\",\"authors\":\"M. Pandurang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19438192.2022.2136125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"have helped us understand how PIOs in the West constitute one of the thriving communities. The third section focuses on the global dimensions of political integration. The first chapter focuses on the ideological hybridity between what the author calls ‘Diasporic Hindutva’ and radical right in the USA and UK. The next chapter focuses on sending state strategies to mobilise its diaspora. It studies the Overseas Citizenship of Indiaa quasi-citizenship offered by the Government of India (GOI) to PIOs to inculcate a sense of indebtedness and, in the process, shape the contours of belonging. The last chapter in this section focuses on differences within the Indo-Caribbean ethnic group and its impact on political integration. The chapter compares Trinidad, Guyana, and Suriname to argue that the degree of ethnic loyalty and level of integration varies significantly among them and attributes the same to political history, colonial background, and even natural resources/geographical factors. The analysis of the support for ‘right’ policies among ‘Diasporic Hindutva’ would have benefitted by examining whether supporting ‘right’ could be seen as a way to navigate inclusion/ integration in the host society marked by racial hierarchy. A comparison with the Jewish diaspora, also regarded as successful, could have further enriched the chapter. The second chapter’s analysis regarding India’s overseas citizenship could have benefitted by elaborating on how through these strategies, the scalar hierarchy of state power that gets reflected beyond the territorial boundary defines belonging for its diasporic population. The last chapter, like the previous chapters, restricts it to the respective national social field. An interrogation of whether the intensity of exchange/contact with their homeland influences group solidarity and their respective integration strategies cum level of integration would have been insightful. Next, the proliferation of PIOs globally marks an expansion in India’s Kin-Statesa theme that this volume doesn’t discuss much. However, as the recent turn of events from Canada to the UK shows, mobilising for homeland issues in the host countries by PIOs could have implications for Indian foreign policy, thereby complicating the bilateral relationship. To conclude, the book’s focus on the groupist integration of PIOs challenges the dominant individual-centric assimilationist paradigm prevalent in western society that equates society and the state. The book has successfully managed to question the melting pot paradigm that requires absolute assimilation to the host state society and views ethnicity and transnational ties as impediments to successful integration. Therefore, this book offers an interesting read to anyone interested in navigating the complexities of the political integration of immigrant communities in their host society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Diaspora\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"272 - 275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Diaspora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19438192.2022.2136125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Diaspora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19438192.2022.2136125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

帮助我们理解了西方的私人股本公司是如何构成一个繁荣的社区的。第三部分侧重于政治一体化的全球层面。第一章着重于作者所称的“流散印度教”和美国和英国激进右翼之间的意识形态混杂。下一章的重点是发送国家战略,以动员其侨民。它研究了印度海外公民身份——印度政府向非海外移民提供的准公民身份,以灌输一种债务意识,并在此过程中塑造归属感。本节最后一章重点讨论印度-加勒比族群内部的差异及其对政治一体化的影响。本章对特立尼达、圭亚那和苏里南三国进行了比较,认为三国的民族忠诚程度和融合程度差异很大,并将其归因于政治历史、殖民背景,甚至自然资源/地理因素。分析“散居印度教徒”对“正确”政策的支持,可以通过检查支持“正确”是否可以被视为一种引导以种族等级为标志的东道国社会包容/融合的方式而受益。与同样被认为是成功的犹太人流散进行比较,可以进一步丰富这一章。第二章关于印度海外公民身份的分析可以通过详细说明如何通过这些策略,反映出超越领土边界的国家权力的标量等级制度来定义其流散人口的归属而受益。最后一章与前几章一样,将其限制在各自国家的社会领域。询问与祖国的交流/接触的强度是否会影响群体团结以及他们各自的整合策略和整合水平,将是有见地的。其次,全球pio的激增标志着印度亲属国家主题的扩张,这一主题在本卷中没有讨论太多。然而,正如最近从加拿大到英国的事态发展所表明的那样,私人股本公司在东道国为国土问题进行动员,可能会对印度的外交政策产生影响,从而使双边关系复杂化。总而言之,本书关注的是pio的群体主义整合,挑战了西方社会普遍存在的以个人为中心的同化主义范式,这种范式将社会与国家等同起来。这本书成功地质疑了需要绝对同化东道国社会的大熔炉范式,并将种族和跨国关系视为成功融合的障碍。因此,对于那些对移民社区在其所在社会的政治融合的复杂性感兴趣的人来说,这本书是一本有趣的读物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kala Pani crossings: revisiting 19th century migration from India’s perspective
have helped us understand how PIOs in the West constitute one of the thriving communities. The third section focuses on the global dimensions of political integration. The first chapter focuses on the ideological hybridity between what the author calls ‘Diasporic Hindutva’ and radical right in the USA and UK. The next chapter focuses on sending state strategies to mobilise its diaspora. It studies the Overseas Citizenship of Indiaa quasi-citizenship offered by the Government of India (GOI) to PIOs to inculcate a sense of indebtedness and, in the process, shape the contours of belonging. The last chapter in this section focuses on differences within the Indo-Caribbean ethnic group and its impact on political integration. The chapter compares Trinidad, Guyana, and Suriname to argue that the degree of ethnic loyalty and level of integration varies significantly among them and attributes the same to political history, colonial background, and even natural resources/geographical factors. The analysis of the support for ‘right’ policies among ‘Diasporic Hindutva’ would have benefitted by examining whether supporting ‘right’ could be seen as a way to navigate inclusion/ integration in the host society marked by racial hierarchy. A comparison with the Jewish diaspora, also regarded as successful, could have further enriched the chapter. The second chapter’s analysis regarding India’s overseas citizenship could have benefitted by elaborating on how through these strategies, the scalar hierarchy of state power that gets reflected beyond the territorial boundary defines belonging for its diasporic population. The last chapter, like the previous chapters, restricts it to the respective national social field. An interrogation of whether the intensity of exchange/contact with their homeland influences group solidarity and their respective integration strategies cum level of integration would have been insightful. Next, the proliferation of PIOs globally marks an expansion in India’s Kin-Statesa theme that this volume doesn’t discuss much. However, as the recent turn of events from Canada to the UK shows, mobilising for homeland issues in the host countries by PIOs could have implications for Indian foreign policy, thereby complicating the bilateral relationship. To conclude, the book’s focus on the groupist integration of PIOs challenges the dominant individual-centric assimilationist paradigm prevalent in western society that equates society and the state. The book has successfully managed to question the melting pot paradigm that requires absolute assimilation to the host state society and views ethnicity and transnational ties as impediments to successful integration. Therefore, this book offers an interesting read to anyone interested in navigating the complexities of the political integration of immigrant communities in their host society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South Asian Diaspora
South Asian Diaspora AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信