{"title":"十年级学生对外英语教材评价","authors":"I. Dewangga, I. Ghozali","doi":"10.36597/jelp.v3i1.4863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims (1) to evaluate the English textbooks used for the tenth grade whether the three textbooks have fulfilled the criteria of good textbook and (2) to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the textbooks. This study was conducted using evaluation research. The theory of evaluation used in this study was the criteria of good textbook proposed by Mukundan, Nimechisalem, and Hajimohammadi (2011) framework. The data were collected through document analysis and interview and analyzed using Miles, Huberman and Saldana’s flow model (2014) of qualitative data research. This study found that Bahasa Inggris X and Pathway to English 1met fourteen criteria of good textbooks proposed by Mukundan, et.al. While, Talk Active X, was met eleventh out of fourteen criteria of good textbooks. Then, the researcher found that the strengths and the weaknesses of the three textbooks. The strengths of Bahasa Inggris X textbooks are (1) provided a teacher’s book, (2) it based on latest 2013 curriculum. The strengths of Pathway to English textbook are (1) provided various methodologies in ELT, and (2) provided audio materials for listening skill. Finally, the strengths of Talk Active X textbook are (1) provided simple task to the complex task, (2) the pictures used in the textbook well matched to the students. Meanwhile, the researcher also found the weaknesses of the three textbooks. Bahasa Inggris X, the weaknesses are 1) did not cover a variety of teaching method, (2) did not provide audio material for listening skill. Furthermore, the weaknesses for Pathway to English are (1) did not provide a teacher’s book; (2) did not match to the syllabus. Finally, Talk Active X textbook, the weaknesses are (1) did not embrace methodologies in ELT; (2) did not support an audio material; (3) did not provide a teacher’s book.","PeriodicalId":32887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"English as a foreign language textbooks evaluation for tenth-grade students\",\"authors\":\"I. Dewangga, I. Ghozali\",\"doi\":\"10.36597/jelp.v3i1.4863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims (1) to evaluate the English textbooks used for the tenth grade whether the three textbooks have fulfilled the criteria of good textbook and (2) to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the textbooks. This study was conducted using evaluation research. The theory of evaluation used in this study was the criteria of good textbook proposed by Mukundan, Nimechisalem, and Hajimohammadi (2011) framework. The data were collected through document analysis and interview and analyzed using Miles, Huberman and Saldana’s flow model (2014) of qualitative data research. This study found that Bahasa Inggris X and Pathway to English 1met fourteen criteria of good textbooks proposed by Mukundan, et.al. While, Talk Active X, was met eleventh out of fourteen criteria of good textbooks. Then, the researcher found that the strengths and the weaknesses of the three textbooks. The strengths of Bahasa Inggris X textbooks are (1) provided a teacher’s book, (2) it based on latest 2013 curriculum. The strengths of Pathway to English textbook are (1) provided various methodologies in ELT, and (2) provided audio materials for listening skill. Finally, the strengths of Talk Active X textbook are (1) provided simple task to the complex task, (2) the pictures used in the textbook well matched to the students. Meanwhile, the researcher also found the weaknesses of the three textbooks. Bahasa Inggris X, the weaknesses are 1) did not cover a variety of teaching method, (2) did not provide audio material for listening skill. Furthermore, the weaknesses for Pathway to English are (1) did not provide a teacher’s book; (2) did not match to the syllabus. Finally, Talk Active X textbook, the weaknesses are (1) did not embrace methodologies in ELT; (2) did not support an audio material; (3) did not provide a teacher’s book.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v3i1.4863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v3i1.4863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是(1)评价这三本教材是否达到了优秀教材的标准;(2)揭示教材的优缺点。本研究采用评价研究方法进行。本研究使用的评价理论是由Mukundan, Nimechisalem, and Hajimohammadi(2011)框架提出的好教材标准。通过文献分析和访谈收集数据,并使用定性数据研究的Miles、Huberman和saldana flow model(2014)进行分析。本研究发现,《马来语X》和《通往英语1》符合Mukundan等人提出的14项优秀教材标准。而《Talk Active X》在14项优秀教科书标准中排名第11位。然后,研究人员发现了三种教科书的优点和缺点。Bahasa Inggris X的优势是:(1)提供教师的书籍;(2)基于2013年的最新课程。《通往英语》教材的优势在于:(1)提供了多种英语教学方法;(2)提供了听力训练的音频材料。最后,《Talk Active X》教材的优势在于:(1)以简单的任务代替复杂的任务,(2)教材中使用的图片与学生相匹配。同时,研究者也发现了这三种教科书的不足之处。《马来语X》的缺点是1)没有涵盖多种教学方法,(2)没有提供听力技巧的音频材料。此外,Pathway to English的弱点是:(1)没有提供教师的书籍;(2)不符合教学大纲。最后,Talk Active X教材的缺点是:(1)没有拥抱英语教学的方法论;(二)不支持录音材料的;(3)没有提供教师的书。
English as a foreign language textbooks evaluation for tenth-grade students
This study aims (1) to evaluate the English textbooks used for the tenth grade whether the three textbooks have fulfilled the criteria of good textbook and (2) to reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the textbooks. This study was conducted using evaluation research. The theory of evaluation used in this study was the criteria of good textbook proposed by Mukundan, Nimechisalem, and Hajimohammadi (2011) framework. The data were collected through document analysis and interview and analyzed using Miles, Huberman and Saldana’s flow model (2014) of qualitative data research. This study found that Bahasa Inggris X and Pathway to English 1met fourteen criteria of good textbooks proposed by Mukundan, et.al. While, Talk Active X, was met eleventh out of fourteen criteria of good textbooks. Then, the researcher found that the strengths and the weaknesses of the three textbooks. The strengths of Bahasa Inggris X textbooks are (1) provided a teacher’s book, (2) it based on latest 2013 curriculum. The strengths of Pathway to English textbook are (1) provided various methodologies in ELT, and (2) provided audio materials for listening skill. Finally, the strengths of Talk Active X textbook are (1) provided simple task to the complex task, (2) the pictures used in the textbook well matched to the students. Meanwhile, the researcher also found the weaknesses of the three textbooks. Bahasa Inggris X, the weaknesses are 1) did not cover a variety of teaching method, (2) did not provide audio material for listening skill. Furthermore, the weaknesses for Pathway to English are (1) did not provide a teacher’s book; (2) did not match to the syllabus. Finally, Talk Active X textbook, the weaknesses are (1) did not embrace methodologies in ELT; (2) did not support an audio material; (3) did not provide a teacher’s book.