喀拉拉邦一家三级医院药物不良反应监测中心的皮肤药物不良反应模式

S. Parvathy, M. Sunitha
{"title":"喀拉拉邦一家三级医院药物不良反应监测中心的皮肤药物不良反应模式","authors":"S. Parvathy, M. Sunitha","doi":"10.5455/njppp.2023.13.12610202213012023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pre-marketing clinical trials can filter only about 50% of the drug reaction. Hence, to prevent the morbidity and mortality due to severe cutaneous reactions early detection, evaluation and monitoring of adverse drug reaction (ADR) especially cutaneous ADR (CADR) are mandatory. Hence, it is imperative that we update our knowledge of the precise nature of ADR which will prevent the reactions as well as to find the offending drug. Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the pattern of CADR, the suspected drugs and to perform the causality assessment using WHO casualty assessment scale. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was done using the data reported to ADR monitoring center in the Department of Pharmacology by the health-care professionals. Suspected CADR was diagnosed by the consultants concerned. The CADRs collected were categorized according to their morphology into maculopapupar rash (MPR), fixed drug eruptions (FDE), urticaria, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. The causality assessment was done using WHO Causality assessment scale. Results: The mean age was 47.20 + 22.31. The most common CADR reported was Urticaria 65.5% followed MPR 23%, FDE 8.8%, and Steven Johnsons Syndrome 2.2%. Anti-microbial drugs were the most frequent cause of the adverse reactions with Amoxicillin clavulinic acid combination being the most frequent suspected drug producing CADR (13.3%). The WHO causality assessment for majority of CADR was Possible (73.5%). Conclusion: Clinical Patterns of CADRs in this set up have some minor variations when compared to studies done across India. Amoxicillin clavulinic acid is the most common suspected drug in this study which was not frequently reported in other ADR monitoring centers.","PeriodicalId":18969,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pattern of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in an adverse drug monitoring center at a tertiary care hospital in Kerala\",\"authors\":\"S. Parvathy, M. Sunitha\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/njppp.2023.13.12610202213012023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Pre-marketing clinical trials can filter only about 50% of the drug reaction. Hence, to prevent the morbidity and mortality due to severe cutaneous reactions early detection, evaluation and monitoring of adverse drug reaction (ADR) especially cutaneous ADR (CADR) are mandatory. Hence, it is imperative that we update our knowledge of the precise nature of ADR which will prevent the reactions as well as to find the offending drug. Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the pattern of CADR, the suspected drugs and to perform the causality assessment using WHO casualty assessment scale. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was done using the data reported to ADR monitoring center in the Department of Pharmacology by the health-care professionals. Suspected CADR was diagnosed by the consultants concerned. The CADRs collected were categorized according to their morphology into maculopapupar rash (MPR), fixed drug eruptions (FDE), urticaria, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. The causality assessment was done using WHO Causality assessment scale. Results: The mean age was 47.20 + 22.31. The most common CADR reported was Urticaria 65.5% followed MPR 23%, FDE 8.8%, and Steven Johnsons Syndrome 2.2%. Anti-microbial drugs were the most frequent cause of the adverse reactions with Amoxicillin clavulinic acid combination being the most frequent suspected drug producing CADR (13.3%). The WHO causality assessment for majority of CADR was Possible (73.5%). Conclusion: Clinical Patterns of CADRs in this set up have some minor variations when compared to studies done across India. Amoxicillin clavulinic acid is the most common suspected drug in this study which was not frequently reported in other ADR monitoring centers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2023.13.12610202213012023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2023.13.12610202213012023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:上市前的临床试验只能过滤50%左右的药物反应。因此,为了预防严重皮肤反应引起的发病率和死亡率,早期发现、评估和监测药物不良反应(ADR)特别是皮肤不良反应(CADR)是必须的。因此,我们必须更新我们对不良反应的确切性质的知识,以防止反应并找到起作用的药物。目的与目的:本研究的目的是评价CADR的发生模式和疑似药物,并采用WHO伤亡评估量表进行因果关系评估。材料与方法:采用卫生保健专业人员向药理学部不良反应监测中心报告的资料进行回顾性描述性研究。有关的顾问医生诊断疑似慢性肾病。收集到的CADRs根据其形态分为斑疹疹(MPR)、固定药疹(FDE)、荨麻疹、Stevens-Johnson综合征和中毒性表皮坏死松解。因果关系评价采用WHO因果关系评价量表。结果:平均年龄47.20岁+ 22.31岁。最常见的CADR报告为荨麻疹65.5%,其次是MPR 23%, FDE 8.8%, Steven johnson综合征2.2%。抗菌药物是最常见的不良反应原因,其中阿莫西林-克拉维酸联用是最常见的可疑药物(13.3%)。WHO对大多数CADR的因果关系评估是可能的(73.5%)。结论:与印度各地的研究相比,该地区cadr的临床模式有一些小的变化。阿莫西林克拉维酸是本研究中最常见的疑似药物,在其他ADR监测中心报道较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pattern of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in an adverse drug monitoring center at a tertiary care hospital in Kerala
Background: Pre-marketing clinical trials can filter only about 50% of the drug reaction. Hence, to prevent the morbidity and mortality due to severe cutaneous reactions early detection, evaluation and monitoring of adverse drug reaction (ADR) especially cutaneous ADR (CADR) are mandatory. Hence, it is imperative that we update our knowledge of the precise nature of ADR which will prevent the reactions as well as to find the offending drug. Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the pattern of CADR, the suspected drugs and to perform the causality assessment using WHO casualty assessment scale. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was done using the data reported to ADR monitoring center in the Department of Pharmacology by the health-care professionals. Suspected CADR was diagnosed by the consultants concerned. The CADRs collected were categorized according to their morphology into maculopapupar rash (MPR), fixed drug eruptions (FDE), urticaria, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. The causality assessment was done using WHO Causality assessment scale. Results: The mean age was 47.20 + 22.31. The most common CADR reported was Urticaria 65.5% followed MPR 23%, FDE 8.8%, and Steven Johnsons Syndrome 2.2%. Anti-microbial drugs were the most frequent cause of the adverse reactions with Amoxicillin clavulinic acid combination being the most frequent suspected drug producing CADR (13.3%). The WHO causality assessment for majority of CADR was Possible (73.5%). Conclusion: Clinical Patterns of CADRs in this set up have some minor variations when compared to studies done across India. Amoxicillin clavulinic acid is the most common suspected drug in this study which was not frequently reported in other ADR monitoring centers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信