揭示挑战:数字文化遗产收藏中的权利声明

Q2 Social Sciences
Hannah Stitzlein, Myung-Ja K. Han, S. Benson
{"title":"揭示挑战:数字文化遗产收藏中的权利声明","authors":"Hannah Stitzlein, Myung-Ja K. Han, S. Benson","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2018.1540328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Describing copyright for cultural heritage objects in a rights statement can be a complicated undertaking when there is not enough information about the object. Similarly the complexity and misunderstanding of copyright law can lead to erroneous claims of copyright ownership when objects are digitized. These challenges are further compounded by confusingly written and poorly implemented rights information, leaving the user in doubt as to how they may interact with, or reuse a digital object. An audit of rights statements in the Illinois Digital Heritage Hub (IDHH) was performed to determine how standardized rights statements from RightsStatements.org can mitigate some of the issues surrounding information used in the rights field of metadata for digital objects. The audit highlighted common issues found throughout the digital object metadata harvested by the IDHH, which were then analyzed to understand how contributors use and apply the rights field. Possible solutions to these issues are included, such as copyright education and outreach programs that help contributing institutions understand copyright laws and the use of proper rights statements.","PeriodicalId":39057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Library Metadata","volume":"1 1","pages":"135 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unraveling Challenges: Rights Statements in Digital Cultural Heritage Collections\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Stitzlein, Myung-Ja K. Han, S. Benson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19386389.2018.1540328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Describing copyright for cultural heritage objects in a rights statement can be a complicated undertaking when there is not enough information about the object. Similarly the complexity and misunderstanding of copyright law can lead to erroneous claims of copyright ownership when objects are digitized. These challenges are further compounded by confusingly written and poorly implemented rights information, leaving the user in doubt as to how they may interact with, or reuse a digital object. An audit of rights statements in the Illinois Digital Heritage Hub (IDHH) was performed to determine how standardized rights statements from RightsStatements.org can mitigate some of the issues surrounding information used in the rights field of metadata for digital objects. The audit highlighted common issues found throughout the digital object metadata harvested by the IDHH, which were then analyzed to understand how contributors use and apply the rights field. Possible solutions to these issues are included, such as copyright education and outreach programs that help contributing institutions understand copyright laws and the use of proper rights statements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Library Metadata\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"135 - 150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Library Metadata\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2018.1540328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Library Metadata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2018.1540328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在没有足够的文物信息的情况下,在权利声明中描述文物的版权是一项复杂的工作。同样,版权法的复杂性和误解也可能导致在数字化对象时对版权所有权的错误主张。令人困惑的书写和执行不力的权利信息进一步加剧了这些挑战,使用户对如何与数字对象交互或重用产生怀疑。我们对伊利诺伊州数字遗产中心(IDHH)中的权利声明进行了审计,以确定RightsStatements.org中的标准化权利声明如何缓解围绕数字对象元数据权利字段中使用的信息的一些问题。审计突出了IDHH收集的数字对象元数据中发现的常见问题,然后对这些问题进行了分析,以了解贡献者如何使用和应用权利字段。这些问题包括可能的解决方案,如版权教育和外展计划,帮助贡献机构了解版权法和使用适当的权利声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unraveling Challenges: Rights Statements in Digital Cultural Heritage Collections
Abstract Describing copyright for cultural heritage objects in a rights statement can be a complicated undertaking when there is not enough information about the object. Similarly the complexity and misunderstanding of copyright law can lead to erroneous claims of copyright ownership when objects are digitized. These challenges are further compounded by confusingly written and poorly implemented rights information, leaving the user in doubt as to how they may interact with, or reuse a digital object. An audit of rights statements in the Illinois Digital Heritage Hub (IDHH) was performed to determine how standardized rights statements from RightsStatements.org can mitigate some of the issues surrounding information used in the rights field of metadata for digital objects. The audit highlighted common issues found throughout the digital object metadata harvested by the IDHH, which were then analyzed to understand how contributors use and apply the rights field. Possible solutions to these issues are included, such as copyright education and outreach programs that help contributing institutions understand copyright laws and the use of proper rights statements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Library Metadata
Journal of Library Metadata Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信