{"title":"相互依赖还是集成?对国家急诊科改进方案进行定性评价","authors":"K. Jones, Jaynie Rance","doi":"10.1108/jica-04-2022-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn Wales (United Kingdom (UK)), a programme known as the emergency department quality and delivery framework (EDQDF) was launched in 2018 with the purpose of designing a framework of what good looks like for emergency care and then implementing this framework in a measurable and sustainable way.Design/methodology/approachA gatekeeper emailed attendees of the EDQDF launch event (n = 70), providing recipients with an information sheet and inviting them to contact the researcher (KJ) if they agreed to be interviewed. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with all respondents (n = 8) after three invitation rounds sent between August and October 2021. The authors used a thematic analysis approach (Braun and Clarke, 2006).FindingsParticipants agreed with the aims and design of the framework, and the authors identified four themes relating to barriers and to facilitators of implementation. Participants perceive a softening of geographical boundaries through the project, but findings correspond with evidence generated elsewhere regarding emergency departments’ (EDs') system-wide interdependencies and a need for cross-organisational collaboration.Research limitations/implicationsA quality improvement method for health services known as CAREMORE® is found to be a useful approach for the collaborative design of service improvements. Participants perceive a softening of geographical boundaries through the project, but the interviews correspond with evidence generated elsewhere regarding EDs' system-wide interdependencies and a need for cross-organisational collaboration.Practical implicationsThis evaluation relies on a relatively small number of participants, but as a qualitative evaluation it does not aim towards broadly generalisable findings but rather contributes to broad field concerned with the production of knowledge on the implementation of health service improvements. The project under evaluation is also on-going, and the findings reflect the period from inception to December 2021, but not beyond that date.Originality/valueThis evaluation builds upon previous work in relation to the application of CAREMORE to design a quality improvement framework in a complex area (see Nelson et al., 2018), but this evaluation considers the implementation process. The findings echo research elsewhere and add to a growing body of research that underlines system interconnectivities that impact upon the emergency department.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interdependencies or integration? A qualitative evaluation of a national emergency department improvement programme\",\"authors\":\"K. Jones, Jaynie Rance\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jica-04-2022-0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeIn Wales (United Kingdom (UK)), a programme known as the emergency department quality and delivery framework (EDQDF) was launched in 2018 with the purpose of designing a framework of what good looks like for emergency care and then implementing this framework in a measurable and sustainable way.Design/methodology/approachA gatekeeper emailed attendees of the EDQDF launch event (n = 70), providing recipients with an information sheet and inviting them to contact the researcher (KJ) if they agreed to be interviewed. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with all respondents (n = 8) after three invitation rounds sent between August and October 2021. The authors used a thematic analysis approach (Braun and Clarke, 2006).FindingsParticipants agreed with the aims and design of the framework, and the authors identified four themes relating to barriers and to facilitators of implementation. Participants perceive a softening of geographical boundaries through the project, but findings correspond with evidence generated elsewhere regarding emergency departments’ (EDs') system-wide interdependencies and a need for cross-organisational collaboration.Research limitations/implicationsA quality improvement method for health services known as CAREMORE® is found to be a useful approach for the collaborative design of service improvements. Participants perceive a softening of geographical boundaries through the project, but the interviews correspond with evidence generated elsewhere regarding EDs' system-wide interdependencies and a need for cross-organisational collaboration.Practical implicationsThis evaluation relies on a relatively small number of participants, but as a qualitative evaluation it does not aim towards broadly generalisable findings but rather contributes to broad field concerned with the production of knowledge on the implementation of health service improvements. The project under evaluation is also on-going, and the findings reflect the period from inception to December 2021, but not beyond that date.Originality/valueThis evaluation builds upon previous work in relation to the application of CAREMORE to design a quality improvement framework in a complex area (see Nelson et al., 2018), but this evaluation considers the implementation process. The findings echo research elsewhere and add to a growing body of research that underlines system interconnectivities that impact upon the emergency department.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrated Care\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrated Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-04-2022-0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-04-2022-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在威尔士(联合王国),2018年启动了一项名为急诊科质量和交付框架(EDQDF)的方案,目的是为急诊护理设计一个良好的框架,然后以可衡量和可持续的方式实施该框架。设计/方法/方法看门人通过电子邮件向EDQDF启动活动的与会者(n = 70)发送信息表,并邀请他们联系研究员(KJ),如果他们同意接受采访。在2021年8月至10月发出三轮邀请后,作者对所有受访者(n = 8)进行了半结构化访谈。作者使用了主题分析方法(Braun and Clarke, 2006)。与会者同意框架的目标和设计,作者确定了与实施障碍和促进因素有关的四个主题。参与者认为,通过该项目,地理界限有所软化,但研究结果与其他地方产生的关于急诊科全系统相互依赖关系和跨组织协作需求的证据相一致。研究的局限性/意义一种被称为CAREMORE®的卫生服务质量改进方法被发现是一种有效的服务改进协同设计方法。参与者通过项目感知到地理界限的弱化,但访谈与其他地方产生的关于EDs系统范围内的相互依赖性和跨组织协作需求的证据相一致。实际影响这一评价依赖于相对较少的参与者,但作为一项定性评价,它的目的不是获得广泛的普遍结论,而是促进与产生关于实施保健服务改进的知识有关的广泛领域。正在评估的项目也在进行中,调查结果反映了从开始到2021年12月的时期,但不超过该日期。原创性/价值此评估建立在先前与应用CAREMORE在复杂领域设计质量改进框架相关的工作基础上(见Nelson等人,2018),但此评估考虑了实施过程。这些发现与其他地方的研究相呼应,并增加了越来越多的研究,这些研究强调系统互联性对急诊科的影响。
Interdependencies or integration? A qualitative evaluation of a national emergency department improvement programme
PurposeIn Wales (United Kingdom (UK)), a programme known as the emergency department quality and delivery framework (EDQDF) was launched in 2018 with the purpose of designing a framework of what good looks like for emergency care and then implementing this framework in a measurable and sustainable way.Design/methodology/approachA gatekeeper emailed attendees of the EDQDF launch event (n = 70), providing recipients with an information sheet and inviting them to contact the researcher (KJ) if they agreed to be interviewed. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with all respondents (n = 8) after three invitation rounds sent between August and October 2021. The authors used a thematic analysis approach (Braun and Clarke, 2006).FindingsParticipants agreed with the aims and design of the framework, and the authors identified four themes relating to barriers and to facilitators of implementation. Participants perceive a softening of geographical boundaries through the project, but findings correspond with evidence generated elsewhere regarding emergency departments’ (EDs') system-wide interdependencies and a need for cross-organisational collaboration.Research limitations/implicationsA quality improvement method for health services known as CAREMORE® is found to be a useful approach for the collaborative design of service improvements. Participants perceive a softening of geographical boundaries through the project, but the interviews correspond with evidence generated elsewhere regarding EDs' system-wide interdependencies and a need for cross-organisational collaboration.Practical implicationsThis evaluation relies on a relatively small number of participants, but as a qualitative evaluation it does not aim towards broadly generalisable findings but rather contributes to broad field concerned with the production of knowledge on the implementation of health service improvements. The project under evaluation is also on-going, and the findings reflect the period from inception to December 2021, but not beyond that date.Originality/valueThis evaluation builds upon previous work in relation to the application of CAREMORE to design a quality improvement framework in a complex area (see Nelson et al., 2018), but this evaluation considers the implementation process. The findings echo research elsewhere and add to a growing body of research that underlines system interconnectivities that impact upon the emergency department.