{"title":"罪责历史主义:瓦尔特·本雅明的“作为宗教的资本主义”、光环和乔叟的赦免案","authors":"G. Edmondson","doi":"10.1080/10412573.2022.2070357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article takes up Walter Benjamin’s allusive 1921 sketch “Capitalism as Religion” in order to think about the place of debt and guilt in our relation, as members (or perhaps apostates) of what Benjamin describes as the “purely cultic religion” of capitalism, to the Middle Ages. My focus here is on two aspects of Benjamin’s sketch. One is its evocation, diametrically opposed to that found in Benjamin’s celebrated essay on the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, of aura as a force of liberating distractedness, rather than politically suspect absorption. The other is the rejoinder “Capitalism as Religion” provides to Benjamin’s sweeping claim, made in another fragmentary sketch, that guilt is “the highest category of world history.” Taking up the disciplinary implications of that claim, the essay reads Chaucer’s Pardoner as a test case for a possible practice of guilt historicism.","PeriodicalId":40762,"journal":{"name":"Exemplaria Classica","volume":"49 1","pages":"103 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guilt Historicism: Walter Benjamin’s “Capitalism as Religion,” Aura, and the Case of Chaucer’s Pardoner\",\"authors\":\"G. Edmondson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10412573.2022.2070357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article takes up Walter Benjamin’s allusive 1921 sketch “Capitalism as Religion” in order to think about the place of debt and guilt in our relation, as members (or perhaps apostates) of what Benjamin describes as the “purely cultic religion” of capitalism, to the Middle Ages. My focus here is on two aspects of Benjamin’s sketch. One is its evocation, diametrically opposed to that found in Benjamin’s celebrated essay on the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, of aura as a force of liberating distractedness, rather than politically suspect absorption. The other is the rejoinder “Capitalism as Religion” provides to Benjamin’s sweeping claim, made in another fragmentary sketch, that guilt is “the highest category of world history.” Taking up the disciplinary implications of that claim, the essay reads Chaucer’s Pardoner as a test case for a possible practice of guilt historicism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exemplaria Classica\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"103 - 129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exemplaria Classica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2022.2070357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exemplaria Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2022.2070357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文以沃尔特·本雅明(Walter Benjamin)在1921年的隐晦素描《作为宗教的资本主义》(Capitalism as Religion)为例,思考作为本雅明所描述的资本主义“纯粹邪教”的成员(或者可能是叛教者),在我们与中世纪的关系中,债务和罪恶感所处的位置。我在这里的重点是本雅明素描的两个方面。其一是它的唤起,与本雅明关于机械复制时代的艺术作品的著名文章截然相反,他认为光环是一种解放分心的力量,而不是政治上可疑的专注。另一个是《作为宗教的资本主义》对本雅明在另一个片段中提出的全面主张的反驳,即内疚是“世界历史的最高范畴”。这篇文章探讨了这一主张的学科含义,将乔叟的《赦免者》视为一种可能的内疚历史主义实践的测试案例。
Guilt Historicism: Walter Benjamin’s “Capitalism as Religion,” Aura, and the Case of Chaucer’s Pardoner
ABSTRACT This article takes up Walter Benjamin’s allusive 1921 sketch “Capitalism as Religion” in order to think about the place of debt and guilt in our relation, as members (or perhaps apostates) of what Benjamin describes as the “purely cultic religion” of capitalism, to the Middle Ages. My focus here is on two aspects of Benjamin’s sketch. One is its evocation, diametrically opposed to that found in Benjamin’s celebrated essay on the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, of aura as a force of liberating distractedness, rather than politically suspect absorption. The other is the rejoinder “Capitalism as Religion” provides to Benjamin’s sweeping claim, made in another fragmentary sketch, that guilt is “the highest category of world history.” Taking up the disciplinary implications of that claim, the essay reads Chaucer’s Pardoner as a test case for a possible practice of guilt historicism.