促进性别平等和替代暴力:对南非农村地区性别变革社区动员计划的看法》(Fostering gender equality and alternatives to violence: perspectives on a gender-transformative community mobilisation programme in rural South Africa.

Botanical Gazette Pub Date : 2020-04-01 Epub Date: 2019-08-20 DOI:10.1080/13691058.2019.1650397
Sarah Treves-Kagan, Suzanne Maman, Nomhle Khoza, Catherine MacPhail, Dean Peacock, Rhian Twine, Kathleen Kahn, Sheri A Lippman, Audrey Pettifor
{"title":"促进性别平等和替代暴力:对南非农村地区性别变革社区动员计划的看法》(Fostering gender equality and alternatives to violence: perspectives on a gender-transformative community mobilisation programme in rural South Africa.","authors":"Sarah Treves-Kagan, Suzanne Maman, Nomhle Khoza, Catherine MacPhail, Dean Peacock, Rhian Twine, Kathleen Kahn, Sheri A Lippman, Audrey Pettifor","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2019.1650397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gender-based violence and violence against children are significant problems in South Africa. Community mobilisation and gender-transformative programming are promising approaches to address and reduce violence. A quantitative evaluation of <i>One Man Can</i>, a gender-transformative community mobilisation programme in South Africa, found mixed results in increasing gender-equitable behaviours and reducing violence. To better understand these findings, we analyse longitudinal qualitative data from community mobilisers, community members and community action teams, exploring individual and community-level factors that facilitate and hinder change. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed and analysed. Participants self-reported changes in their gender-equitable attitudes and use of violence as a result of participation in the programme, although some participants also reported opposition to shifting to a more gender-equitable culture. Facilitators to change included the internalisation of gender-transformative messaging and supportive social networks, which was buoyed by a shared vocabulary in their community generated by <i>One Man Can</i>. Because the programme targeted a critical mass of community members with gender-transformative programming, mobilisers and community action teams were held accountable by community members to model non-violent behaviour. Results reinforce the importance of addressing facilitators and barriers to change at both individual and community levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":9213,"journal":{"name":"Botanical Gazette","volume":"57 1","pages":"127-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fostering gender equality and alternatives to violence: perspectives on a gender-transformative community mobilisation programme in rural South Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Treves-Kagan, Suzanne Maman, Nomhle Khoza, Catherine MacPhail, Dean Peacock, Rhian Twine, Kathleen Kahn, Sheri A Lippman, Audrey Pettifor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13691058.2019.1650397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gender-based violence and violence against children are significant problems in South Africa. Community mobilisation and gender-transformative programming are promising approaches to address and reduce violence. A quantitative evaluation of <i>One Man Can</i>, a gender-transformative community mobilisation programme in South Africa, found mixed results in increasing gender-equitable behaviours and reducing violence. To better understand these findings, we analyse longitudinal qualitative data from community mobilisers, community members and community action teams, exploring individual and community-level factors that facilitate and hinder change. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed and analysed. Participants self-reported changes in their gender-equitable attitudes and use of violence as a result of participation in the programme, although some participants also reported opposition to shifting to a more gender-equitable culture. Facilitators to change included the internalisation of gender-transformative messaging and supportive social networks, which was buoyed by a shared vocabulary in their community generated by <i>One Man Can</i>. Because the programme targeted a critical mass of community members with gender-transformative programming, mobilisers and community action teams were held accountable by community members to model non-violent behaviour. Results reinforce the importance of addressing facilitators and barriers to change at both individual and community levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Botanical Gazette\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"127-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7905832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Botanical Gazette\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2019.1650397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanical Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2019.1650397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于性别的暴力和针对儿童的暴力是南非的重大问题。社区动员和性别变革计划是解决和减少暴力的有效方法。对南非的性别变革社区动员计划 "一个人能"(One Man Can)进行的定量评估发现,该计划在提高性别平等行为和减少暴力方面的效果参差不齐。为了更好地理解这些发现,我们分析了来自社区动员者、社区成员和社区行动小组的纵向定性数据,探讨了促进和阻碍改变的个人和社区层面的因素。我们对访谈和焦点小组进行了记录和分析。参与者自我报告说,由于参加了该计划,他们在性别平等态度和使用暴力方面发生了变化,但也有一些参与者报告说,他们反对向更注重性别平等的文化转变。促进改变的因素包括性别变革信息的内化和支持性的社会网络,而 "一个人可以 "计划在社区中产生的共同词汇则为这一改变提供了动力。由于该计划的目标是为社区成员提供改变性别观念的方案,因此社区成员要求动员者和社区行动小组负责示范非暴力行为。结果强化了在个人和社区层面解决变革的促进因素和障碍的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fostering gender equality and alternatives to violence: perspectives on a gender-transformative community mobilisation programme in rural South Africa.

Gender-based violence and violence against children are significant problems in South Africa. Community mobilisation and gender-transformative programming are promising approaches to address and reduce violence. A quantitative evaluation of One Man Can, a gender-transformative community mobilisation programme in South Africa, found mixed results in increasing gender-equitable behaviours and reducing violence. To better understand these findings, we analyse longitudinal qualitative data from community mobilisers, community members and community action teams, exploring individual and community-level factors that facilitate and hinder change. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed and analysed. Participants self-reported changes in their gender-equitable attitudes and use of violence as a result of participation in the programme, although some participants also reported opposition to shifting to a more gender-equitable culture. Facilitators to change included the internalisation of gender-transformative messaging and supportive social networks, which was buoyed by a shared vocabulary in their community generated by One Man Can. Because the programme targeted a critical mass of community members with gender-transformative programming, mobilisers and community action teams were held accountable by community members to model non-violent behaviour. Results reinforce the importance of addressing facilitators and barriers to change at both individual and community levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信