运输基础设施成本效益分析的更广泛经济影响-过桥?

IF 0.1
L. Dobes, J. Leung
{"title":"运输基础设施成本效益分析的更广泛经济影响-过桥?","authors":"L. Dobes, J. Leung","doi":"10.22459/AG.22.01.2015.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proponents of transport infrastructure have in recent decades sought to augment the estimated benefit of major projects beyond conventional cost-benefit analysis. Improved transport links are claimed to increase Marshallian external economies of scale; to reduce transport costs experienced by imperfectly competitive industries, and so induce them to increase their output; and to increase supply of labour, in response to lower transport costs, and thereby increase GDP and tax receipts. Estimates of the value of these three additional effects have resulted in multipliers and 'uprate factors' that appear to be applied by some government agencies to transport sector benefits calculated using conventional CBA. However, empirical estimates of these effects are likely to be exaggerated.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"25 1","pages":"75-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Infrastructure Cost-Benefit Analysis - A Bridge Too Far?\",\"authors\":\"L. Dobes, J. Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/AG.22.01.2015.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proponents of transport infrastructure have in recent decades sought to augment the estimated benefit of major projects beyond conventional cost-benefit analysis. Improved transport links are claimed to increase Marshallian external economies of scale; to reduce transport costs experienced by imperfectly competitive industries, and so induce them to increase their output; and to increase supply of labour, in response to lower transport costs, and thereby increase GDP and tax receipts. Estimates of the value of these three additional effects have resulted in multipliers and 'uprate factors' that appear to be applied by some government agencies to transport sector benefits calculated using conventional CBA. However, empirical estimates of these effects are likely to be exaggerated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"75-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.22.01.2015.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.22.01.2015.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

近几十年来,交通基础设施的支持者一直在寻求扩大大型项目的估计效益,超越传统的成本效益分析。据称,改善交通联系可以增加马绍尔的外部规模经济;降低不完全竞争产业的运输成本,从而促使它们增加产量;并增加劳动力供应,以应对运输成本下降,从而增加GDP和税收收入。对这三种附加效应价值的估计产生了乘数和“升级因子”,一些政府机构似乎将其应用于使用传统CBA计算的运输部门效益。然而,对这些影响的经验估计可能被夸大了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wider Economic Impacts in Transport Infrastructure Cost-Benefit Analysis - A Bridge Too Far?
Proponents of transport infrastructure have in recent decades sought to augment the estimated benefit of major projects beyond conventional cost-benefit analysis. Improved transport links are claimed to increase Marshallian external economies of scale; to reduce transport costs experienced by imperfectly competitive industries, and so induce them to increase their output; and to increase supply of labour, in response to lower transport costs, and thereby increase GDP and tax receipts. Estimates of the value of these three additional effects have resulted in multipliers and 'uprate factors' that appear to be applied by some government agencies to transport sector benefits calculated using conventional CBA. However, empirical estimates of these effects are likely to be exaggerated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信