外伤性泪小管撕裂伤的重建:5年经验

S. Y. Sendul, H. Çağatay, B. Dirim, M. Demir, Sonmez Cinar, C. Ucgul, Z. Acar, D. Guven
{"title":"外伤性泪小管撕裂伤的重建:5年经验","authors":"S. Y. Sendul, H. Çağatay, B. Dirim, M. Demir, Sonmez Cinar, C. Ucgul, Z. Acar, D. Guven","doi":"10.11131/2015/101121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the demographic and epidemiological data, clinical features and surgical outcomes of lacrimal canalicular lacerations. Methods: The charts ofall patients who applied to our emergency department with eyelid laceration from 2008 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic and epidemiological data, clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, simultaneous injuries and complications of patients who underwent canalicular laceration repair surgery were analyzed. Results: A total of 556 patients were identified with an eyelid laceration, and in 42 (7.55%) of these patients 44 lacrimal canalicular lacerations were detected. The average age was 26.16±18.42 (range 5 to 78) years and mean follow-up time was 17.62±6.62 months (range 12-42 months). The male-to-female ratio was 5.3-1. The lower canaliculus was involved in 33 patients (78.57%), the upper in 7 patients (16.6%), and 2 patients (4.76%) had bicanalicular involvement. The most common etiology of canalicular laceration was assault (n = 16, 38.1%) followed by traffic accidents (n = 8, 19.05%). In 28 patients (66.67%) surgery was performed within 24 hours and in 14 patients (33.33%) surgery was performed between 24 hours and 6 days. In 32 patients (76.2%) direct anatomosis and in 10 patients (23.8%) indirect anastomosis was performed. Tubes were removed after a mean time of 5.8±2.8 months. Anatomic success was 96.87%, while functional success was 92.85%. Complications were detected in 3 cases: two patients had early tube extrusions and in patient had punctal slits. Conclusion: Reconstruction of traumatic lacrimal canalicular lacerations with stenting gives good results at long-term follow up. The Mini-Monoka tube is a safe, simple, effective method with few complications.","PeriodicalId":19674,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconstructions of Traumatic Lacrimal Canalicular Lacerations: A 5 Years Experience\",\"authors\":\"S. Y. Sendul, H. Çağatay, B. Dirim, M. Demir, Sonmez Cinar, C. Ucgul, Z. Acar, D. Guven\",\"doi\":\"10.11131/2015/101121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the demographic and epidemiological data, clinical features and surgical outcomes of lacrimal canalicular lacerations. Methods: The charts ofall patients who applied to our emergency department with eyelid laceration from 2008 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic and epidemiological data, clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, simultaneous injuries and complications of patients who underwent canalicular laceration repair surgery were analyzed. Results: A total of 556 patients were identified with an eyelid laceration, and in 42 (7.55%) of these patients 44 lacrimal canalicular lacerations were detected. The average age was 26.16±18.42 (range 5 to 78) years and mean follow-up time was 17.62±6.62 months (range 12-42 months). The male-to-female ratio was 5.3-1. The lower canaliculus was involved in 33 patients (78.57%), the upper in 7 patients (16.6%), and 2 patients (4.76%) had bicanalicular involvement. The most common etiology of canalicular laceration was assault (n = 16, 38.1%) followed by traffic accidents (n = 8, 19.05%). In 28 patients (66.67%) surgery was performed within 24 hours and in 14 patients (33.33%) surgery was performed between 24 hours and 6 days. In 32 patients (76.2%) direct anatomosis and in 10 patients (23.8%) indirect anastomosis was performed. Tubes were removed after a mean time of 5.8±2.8 months. Anatomic success was 96.87%, while functional success was 92.85%. Complications were detected in 3 cases: two patients had early tube extrusions and in patient had punctal slits. Conclusion: Reconstruction of traumatic lacrimal canalicular lacerations with stenting gives good results at long-term follow up. The Mini-Monoka tube is a safe, simple, effective method with few complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Journal of Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Journal of Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11131/2015/101121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11131/2015/101121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是评估泪小管撕裂伤的人口学和流行病学资料、临床特征和手术结果。方法:回顾性分析2008 ~ 2013年急诊眼睑撕裂伤患者资料。分析行小管撕裂修补术患者的人口学、流行病学资料、临床特点、治疗结果、并发损伤及并发症。结果:556例眼睑撕裂伤,42例(7.55%)发现泪小管撕裂伤44处。患者平均年龄26.16±18.42岁(5 ~ 78岁),平均随访时间17.62±6.62个月(12 ~ 42个月)。男女比例为5.3-1。下小管受累33例(78.57%),上小管受累7例(16.6%),双小管受累2例(4.76%)。小管撕裂伤最常见的病因是人身攻击(16例,38.1%),其次是交通事故(8例,19.05%)。28例(66.67%)在24小时内手术,14例(33.33%)在24小时至6天内手术。直接吻合32例(76.2%),间接吻合10例(23.8%)。平均时间为5.8±2.8个月。解剖成功率96.87%,功能成功率92.85%。3例出现并发症:2例出现早期管突,1例出现点状开缝。结论:外伤性泪小管撕裂行支架置入术,长期随访效果良好。Mini-Monoka管是一种安全、简单、有效且并发症少的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconstructions of Traumatic Lacrimal Canalicular Lacerations: A 5 Years Experience
Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the demographic and epidemiological data, clinical features and surgical outcomes of lacrimal canalicular lacerations. Methods: The charts ofall patients who applied to our emergency department with eyelid laceration from 2008 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic and epidemiological data, clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, simultaneous injuries and complications of patients who underwent canalicular laceration repair surgery were analyzed. Results: A total of 556 patients were identified with an eyelid laceration, and in 42 (7.55%) of these patients 44 lacrimal canalicular lacerations were detected. The average age was 26.16±18.42 (range 5 to 78) years and mean follow-up time was 17.62±6.62 months (range 12-42 months). The male-to-female ratio was 5.3-1. The lower canaliculus was involved in 33 patients (78.57%), the upper in 7 patients (16.6%), and 2 patients (4.76%) had bicanalicular involvement. The most common etiology of canalicular laceration was assault (n = 16, 38.1%) followed by traffic accidents (n = 8, 19.05%). In 28 patients (66.67%) surgery was performed within 24 hours and in 14 patients (33.33%) surgery was performed between 24 hours and 6 days. In 32 patients (76.2%) direct anatomosis and in 10 patients (23.8%) indirect anastomosis was performed. Tubes were removed after a mean time of 5.8±2.8 months. Anatomic success was 96.87%, while functional success was 92.85%. Complications were detected in 3 cases: two patients had early tube extrusions and in patient had punctal slits. Conclusion: Reconstruction of traumatic lacrimal canalicular lacerations with stenting gives good results at long-term follow up. The Mini-Monoka tube is a safe, simple, effective method with few complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信