法国:迈向数字民主

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
A. Pilipenko
{"title":"法国:迈向数字民主","authors":"A. Pilipenko","doi":"10.17323/2072-8166.2019.4.185.207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article, using the example of France, a country with a rich democratic historyand tradition, examines the process of transformation of the concept and the role ofdemocracy in the digital revolution. In this context, the object of the study was new ideasin assessing democracy and their refraction in the legislative activity of the parliamentand implementation by the executive branch, as well as their impact on the rights andfreedoms of the individual. The purpose of the work is to find an answer to the question ofhow traditional forms of democracy and their perception in the public mind correspond tothe realities of our days. This defines its main tasks - identifying the effects of digitalizationon democracy, their impact on democratic institutions and processes. To implementthe tasks set, both general scientific research methods (logical, historical, systemic)and special methods were used: formal legal, comparative legal methods, and theinterpretation of law. For specialists who advocate the concept of “digital democracy”, itsimplementation opens up new prospects for the establishment of true democracy, wheredirect forms of its implementation, citizen participation in decision-making at all levelsof government are expanding. There are other points of view, the essence of which is todeny the significant effects of digitalization on democracy. Moreover, its State reforms inFrance attach particular importance to the “figure”, which, according to their initiators,will generally strengthen the country’s democratic institutions. The figure appears in thetitle of the work of the working groups on the parliamentary reform, in the laws adoptedby it, which allocated and subjected to legal regulation of areas of activity, especially those affected by digitalization. negative consequences are emphasized: cybercrime,dehumanization of society, human exclusion. The article outlines a number of problemsthat digitalization poses for democracy and its main subject and object - the person.Indeed, digitalization opens up unprecedented opportunities, but does it fundamentallychange the nature and nature of the relationship between “managers” and “governed”(L. Duguit). All these issues were the subject of analysis in this article.","PeriodicalId":42704,"journal":{"name":"Pravo-Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki","volume":"37 1","pages":"185-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"France: to Digital Democracy\",\"authors\":\"A. Pilipenko\",\"doi\":\"10.17323/2072-8166.2019.4.185.207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article, using the example of France, a country with a rich democratic historyand tradition, examines the process of transformation of the concept and the role ofdemocracy in the digital revolution. In this context, the object of the study was new ideasin assessing democracy and their refraction in the legislative activity of the parliamentand implementation by the executive branch, as well as their impact on the rights andfreedoms of the individual. The purpose of the work is to find an answer to the question ofhow traditional forms of democracy and their perception in the public mind correspond tothe realities of our days. This defines its main tasks - identifying the effects of digitalizationon democracy, their impact on democratic institutions and processes. To implementthe tasks set, both general scientific research methods (logical, historical, systemic)and special methods were used: formal legal, comparative legal methods, and theinterpretation of law. For specialists who advocate the concept of “digital democracy”, itsimplementation opens up new prospects for the establishment of true democracy, wheredirect forms of its implementation, citizen participation in decision-making at all levelsof government are expanding. There are other points of view, the essence of which is todeny the significant effects of digitalization on democracy. Moreover, its State reforms inFrance attach particular importance to the “figure”, which, according to their initiators,will generally strengthen the country’s democratic institutions. The figure appears in thetitle of the work of the working groups on the parliamentary reform, in the laws adoptedby it, which allocated and subjected to legal regulation of areas of activity, especially those affected by digitalization. negative consequences are emphasized: cybercrime,dehumanization of society, human exclusion. The article outlines a number of problemsthat digitalization poses for democracy and its main subject and object - the person.Indeed, digitalization opens up unprecedented opportunities, but does it fundamentallychange the nature and nature of the relationship between “managers” and “governed”(L. Duguit). All these issues were the subject of analysis in this article.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravo-Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"185-207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravo-Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2019.4.185.207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravo-Zhurnal Vysshei Shkoly Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2072-8166.2019.4.185.207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文以具有丰富民主历史和传统的法国为例,考察了民主概念的转变过程以及民主在数字革命中的作用。在这方面,研究的目的是评估民主的新观念及其在议会立法活动和行政部门执行中的折射,以及它们对个人权利和自由的影响。这项工作的目的是找到一个问题的答案,即传统的民主形式及其在公众心中的看法如何与我们这个时代的现实相对应。这定义了它的主要任务——确定数字化对民主的影响,以及它们对民主制度和进程的影响。为了完成设定的任务,既使用了一般的科学研究方法(逻辑的、历史的、系统的),也使用了特殊的方法:正式法、比较法和法律解释。对于倡导“数字民主”概念的专家来说,它的实施为建立真正的民主开辟了新的前景,其实施的直接形式,公民参与各级政府决策的方式正在扩大。还有其他观点,其本质是否认数字化对民主的重大影响。此外,它在法国的国家改革特别重视“数字”,根据其发起者的说法,这将普遍加强该国的民主体制。这一数字出现在议会改革工作组的工作标题中,在其通过的法律中,这些法律分配并受到活动领域的法律监管,特别是受数字化影响的领域。强调了网络犯罪、社会非人化、人类排斥等消极后果。这篇文章概述了数字化给民主及其主体和客体——人——带来的一系列问题。的确,数字化带来了前所未有的机遇,但它是否从根本上改变了“管理者”和“被管理者”之间关系的性质和性质?Duguit)。所有这些问题都是本文分析的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
France: to Digital Democracy
The article, using the example of France, a country with a rich democratic historyand tradition, examines the process of transformation of the concept and the role ofdemocracy in the digital revolution. In this context, the object of the study was new ideasin assessing democracy and their refraction in the legislative activity of the parliamentand implementation by the executive branch, as well as their impact on the rights andfreedoms of the individual. The purpose of the work is to find an answer to the question ofhow traditional forms of democracy and their perception in the public mind correspond tothe realities of our days. This defines its main tasks - identifying the effects of digitalizationon democracy, their impact on democratic institutions and processes. To implementthe tasks set, both general scientific research methods (logical, historical, systemic)and special methods were used: formal legal, comparative legal methods, and theinterpretation of law. For specialists who advocate the concept of “digital democracy”, itsimplementation opens up new prospects for the establishment of true democracy, wheredirect forms of its implementation, citizen participation in decision-making at all levelsof government are expanding. There are other points of view, the essence of which is todeny the significant effects of digitalization on democracy. Moreover, its State reforms inFrance attach particular importance to the “figure”, which, according to their initiators,will generally strengthen the country’s democratic institutions. The figure appears in thetitle of the work of the working groups on the parliamentary reform, in the laws adoptedby it, which allocated and subjected to legal regulation of areas of activity, especially those affected by digitalization. negative consequences are emphasized: cybercrime,dehumanization of society, human exclusion. The article outlines a number of problemsthat digitalization poses for democracy and its main subject and object - the person.Indeed, digitalization opens up unprecedented opportunities, but does it fundamentallychange the nature and nature of the relationship between “managers” and “governed”(L. Duguit). All these issues were the subject of analysis in this article.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信