一个国家,两个日历:中国a股市场的农历一月效应

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Xiaobo Liang, Qianqiu Liu, Allan A. Zebedee
{"title":"一个国家,两个日历:中国a股市场的农历一月效应","authors":"Xiaobo Liang,&nbsp;Qianqiu Liu,&nbsp;Allan A. Zebedee","doi":"10.1111/ajfs.12404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, we examine the January effect in China's A-share stock market from January 1995 to December 2019 using both the solar and lunar calendars. Consistent with the existing literature, we find the absence of a traditional January effect in the solar calendar; however, we observe a strong January effect in the lunar calendar. Moreover, the effect is much stronger in small firms. We demonstrate that the tax-loss selling and window dressing hypotheses cannot explain the turn-of-the-year effect in China. Instead, the turn-of-the-year effect in trading volume and buy orders help to explain the strong lunar January effect. As a falsification test, we examine the B-share market that is predominantly composed of foreign investors and find no evidence of the lunar January effect. Our results show that Chinese financial markets are more closely aligned with the traditional lunar calendar than the standard solar calendar.</p>","PeriodicalId":8570,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies","volume":"51 6","pages":"859-895"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One Country, Two Calendars: Lunar January Effect in China's A-Share Stock Market\",\"authors\":\"Xiaobo Liang,&nbsp;Qianqiu Liu,&nbsp;Allan A. Zebedee\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajfs.12404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this paper, we examine the January effect in China's A-share stock market from January 1995 to December 2019 using both the solar and lunar calendars. Consistent with the existing literature, we find the absence of a traditional January effect in the solar calendar; however, we observe a strong January effect in the lunar calendar. Moreover, the effect is much stronger in small firms. We demonstrate that the tax-loss selling and window dressing hypotheses cannot explain the turn-of-the-year effect in China. Instead, the turn-of-the-year effect in trading volume and buy orders help to explain the strong lunar January effect. As a falsification test, we examine the B-share market that is predominantly composed of foreign investors and find no evidence of the lunar January effect. Our results show that Chinese financial markets are more closely aligned with the traditional lunar calendar than the standard solar calendar.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies\",\"volume\":\"51 6\",\"pages\":\"859-895\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajfs.12404\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajfs.12404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文采用阳历和阴历对1995年1月至2019年12月中国a股市场的“一月效应”进行了检验。与现有文献一致,我们发现阳历中没有传统的一月效应;然而,我们在农历中观察到强烈的一月效应。此外,这种影响在小公司中更为强烈。我们证明了税收损失出售和粉饰账面假说不能解释中国的岁末效应。相反,交易量和买入订单的岁末效应有助于解释强劲的农历1月效应。作为一个证伪检验,我们考察了主要由外国投资者组成的b股市场,并没有发现农历一月效应的证据。我们的研究结果表明,中国金融市场与传统农历的关系比与标准阳历的关系更紧密。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One Country, Two Calendars: Lunar January Effect in China's A-Share Stock Market

In this paper, we examine the January effect in China's A-share stock market from January 1995 to December 2019 using both the solar and lunar calendars. Consistent with the existing literature, we find the absence of a traditional January effect in the solar calendar; however, we observe a strong January effect in the lunar calendar. Moreover, the effect is much stronger in small firms. We demonstrate that the tax-loss selling and window dressing hypotheses cannot explain the turn-of-the-year effect in China. Instead, the turn-of-the-year effect in trading volume and buy orders help to explain the strong lunar January effect. As a falsification test, we examine the B-share market that is predominantly composed of foreign investors and find no evidence of the lunar January effect. Our results show that Chinese financial markets are more closely aligned with the traditional lunar calendar than the standard solar calendar.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信