{"title":"20世纪10年代西伯利亚期刊出版社阿列克谢·列米佐夫的文学个性","authors":"E. Vakhnenko","doi":"10.17223/19986645/82/11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the material of publications published in the central Siberian periodicals, the article examines critical reception of Alexei Remizov’s works. Particular attention is paid to the analytical reviews of Elena A. Koltonovskaya, a Moscow columnist who collaborated with the Tomsk newspaper Sibirskaya zhizn’, and Nikolai F. Chuzhak-Nasimovich, a leading journalist and critic of the Irkutsk newspapers Vostochnaya zarya, Sibirskie otgoloski, Irkutskoe slovo. Remizov’s works “The Indefatigable Tambourine” and “The Cross Sisters” are analyzed in the context of the realistic and modernist approaches of critics to art, critics’ dialogue with representatives of the literary environment of Central Russia. As an example of a lively reaction to Remizov’s works, the author of the article presents the view of an anonymous reader, who opposed the Irkutsk critic on behalf of the local intelligentsia, called “The Indefatigable Tambourine” “the delirium of a madman” thus demonstrating not only an absolute rejection of the writer’s artistic style, but also unwillingness to perceive new literary trends. The author devotes a separate analytical section to the reviews of Remizov’s works, presented sporadically and written without interest in the writer’s personality and works; Remizov’s legacy was analyzed in the context of the creative approaches of his contemporaries. Particular attention is paid to the parodies published on the pages of the newspapers Sibirskie otgoloski (Tomsk) and Vechernie izvestiya (Irkutsk) in 1910 and 1918. In line with the editorial policy of the newspapers, oriented mainly towards the mass reader, who got an idea of the writer from publications in the press, parodies of contemporary authors’ works were perceived as a vivid characteristic, a kind of a literary portrait. The texts dedicated to Remizov ridiculed the specificity of his language and style, the peculiarities of his creative manner. His socio-political position, which was voiced in one of the key and iconic texts of the revolutionary time, “The Commandment to the Russian People”, was presented to the reader in an absolutely destructive ironic manner, distorting Remizov’s idea. As a result of the analysis, the author came to the conclusion about the formation of a controversial opinion about Remizov’s art, which developed both among the profane readers and the intellectuals. On the one hand, the analytical performances of Koltonovskaya and Chuzhak- Nasimovich contributed to the emergence of a deep and conscious appreciation of Remizov’s works; on the other hand, sporadic parodic critical responses deprived the reader of the opportunity to form a holistic view of the constants of the writer’s artistic world. Unlike numerous reviews published in St. Petersburg and Moscow, where Remizov’s artistic practices were perceived in the context of the contemporary historical and literary atmosphere, and the critics were analyzing the genesis of the author’s creative world, the publications of Siberian journalists aroused in readers feelings of antipathy, misunderstanding and rejection of Remizov’s manner rather than a desire to comprehend the specifics of the writer’s gift.","PeriodicalId":43853,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Filologiya-Tomsk State University Journal of Philology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The literary personality of Alexei Remizov in the Siberian periodical press of the 1910s\",\"authors\":\"E. Vakhnenko\",\"doi\":\"10.17223/19986645/82/11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the material of publications published in the central Siberian periodicals, the article examines critical reception of Alexei Remizov’s works. Particular attention is paid to the analytical reviews of Elena A. Koltonovskaya, a Moscow columnist who collaborated with the Tomsk newspaper Sibirskaya zhizn’, and Nikolai F. Chuzhak-Nasimovich, a leading journalist and critic of the Irkutsk newspapers Vostochnaya zarya, Sibirskie otgoloski, Irkutskoe slovo. Remizov’s works “The Indefatigable Tambourine” and “The Cross Sisters” are analyzed in the context of the realistic and modernist approaches of critics to art, critics’ dialogue with representatives of the literary environment of Central Russia. As an example of a lively reaction to Remizov’s works, the author of the article presents the view of an anonymous reader, who opposed the Irkutsk critic on behalf of the local intelligentsia, called “The Indefatigable Tambourine” “the delirium of a madman” thus demonstrating not only an absolute rejection of the writer’s artistic style, but also unwillingness to perceive new literary trends. The author devotes a separate analytical section to the reviews of Remizov’s works, presented sporadically and written without interest in the writer’s personality and works; Remizov’s legacy was analyzed in the context of the creative approaches of his contemporaries. Particular attention is paid to the parodies published on the pages of the newspapers Sibirskie otgoloski (Tomsk) and Vechernie izvestiya (Irkutsk) in 1910 and 1918. In line with the editorial policy of the newspapers, oriented mainly towards the mass reader, who got an idea of the writer from publications in the press, parodies of contemporary authors’ works were perceived as a vivid characteristic, a kind of a literary portrait. The texts dedicated to Remizov ridiculed the specificity of his language and style, the peculiarities of his creative manner. His socio-political position, which was voiced in one of the key and iconic texts of the revolutionary time, “The Commandment to the Russian People”, was presented to the reader in an absolutely destructive ironic manner, distorting Remizov’s idea. As a result of the analysis, the author came to the conclusion about the formation of a controversial opinion about Remizov’s art, which developed both among the profane readers and the intellectuals. On the one hand, the analytical performances of Koltonovskaya and Chuzhak- Nasimovich contributed to the emergence of a deep and conscious appreciation of Remizov’s works; on the other hand, sporadic parodic critical responses deprived the reader of the opportunity to form a holistic view of the constants of the writer’s artistic world. Unlike numerous reviews published in St. Petersburg and Moscow, where Remizov’s artistic practices were perceived in the context of the contemporary historical and literary atmosphere, and the critics were analyzing the genesis of the author’s creative world, the publications of Siberian journalists aroused in readers feelings of antipathy, misunderstanding and rejection of Remizov’s manner rather than a desire to comprehend the specifics of the writer’s gift.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Filologiya-Tomsk State University Journal of Philology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Filologiya-Tomsk State University Journal of Philology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/82/11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta Filologiya-Tomsk State University Journal of Philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/82/11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文以在西伯利亚中部期刊上发表的出版物材料为基础,考察了对列米佐夫作品的批评接受情况。书中特别关注了与托木斯克《西伯利亚日报》(Sibirskaya zhzn)合作的莫斯科专栏作家埃琳娜·a·科尔托诺夫斯卡娅(Elena a . Koltonovskaya)和伊尔库茨克《东方日报》(Vostochnaya zarya)、《西伯利亚日报》(Sibirskie otgoloski)、《伊尔库茨克日报》(Irkutskoe slovo)的著名记者兼评论家尼古拉·f·丘扎克-纳西莫维奇(Nikolai F. Chuzhak-Nasimovich)的分析性评论。本文将列米佐夫的作品《不知疲倦的手鼓》和《十字架姐妹》放在现实主义和现代主义的艺术批评方法的背景下进行分析,并与俄罗斯中部文学环境的代表人物进行对话。作为对列米佐夫作品的生动反应的一个例子,这篇文章的作者提出了一个匿名读者的观点,他代表当地知识分子反对伊尔库茨克评论家,称之为“不知疲倦的手鼓”“疯子的谵癫”,从而表明不仅绝对拒绝作家的艺术风格,而且不愿意理解新的文学趋势。作者用了一个单独的分析部分来评论雷米佐夫的作品,偶尔出现,对作家的个性和作品不感兴趣;雷米佐夫的遗产是在他同时代的创造性方法的背景下分析的。1910年和1918年在托木斯克(Tomsk)和伊尔库茨克(Irkutsk)两家报纸上刊登的恶搞作品尤为引人注目。根据报纸的编辑政策,主要面向大众读者,读者从报纸上的出版物中了解作家,对当代作家作品的模仿被认为是一种生动的特征,一种文学肖像。献给雷米佐夫的文章嘲笑他的语言和风格的特殊性,嘲笑他创作方式的独特性。他的社会政治立场,在革命时期的关键和标志性文本之一“给俄罗斯人民的诫命”中表达出来,以一种绝对具有破坏性的讽刺方式呈现给读者,扭曲了雷米佐夫的想法。通过对列米佐夫艺术的分析,得出了在世俗读者和知识分子中形成一种有争议的观点的结论。一方面,Koltonovskaya和Chuzhak- Nasimovich的分析表演有助于对Remizov作品产生深刻而有意识的欣赏;另一方面,零星的模仿式的批评反应剥夺了读者对作家艺术世界的常量形成整体观点的机会。在圣彼得堡和莫斯科,雷米佐夫的艺术实践是在当代历史和文学氛围的背景下被理解的,评论家们分析作者创作世界的起源,与此不同的是,西伯利亚记者的出版物引起了读者对雷米佐夫的方式的反感、误解和拒绝,而不是想要理解作家天赋的具体细节。
The literary personality of Alexei Remizov in the Siberian periodical press of the 1910s
Based on the material of publications published in the central Siberian periodicals, the article examines critical reception of Alexei Remizov’s works. Particular attention is paid to the analytical reviews of Elena A. Koltonovskaya, a Moscow columnist who collaborated with the Tomsk newspaper Sibirskaya zhizn’, and Nikolai F. Chuzhak-Nasimovich, a leading journalist and critic of the Irkutsk newspapers Vostochnaya zarya, Sibirskie otgoloski, Irkutskoe slovo. Remizov’s works “The Indefatigable Tambourine” and “The Cross Sisters” are analyzed in the context of the realistic and modernist approaches of critics to art, critics’ dialogue with representatives of the literary environment of Central Russia. As an example of a lively reaction to Remizov’s works, the author of the article presents the view of an anonymous reader, who opposed the Irkutsk critic on behalf of the local intelligentsia, called “The Indefatigable Tambourine” “the delirium of a madman” thus demonstrating not only an absolute rejection of the writer’s artistic style, but also unwillingness to perceive new literary trends. The author devotes a separate analytical section to the reviews of Remizov’s works, presented sporadically and written without interest in the writer’s personality and works; Remizov’s legacy was analyzed in the context of the creative approaches of his contemporaries. Particular attention is paid to the parodies published on the pages of the newspapers Sibirskie otgoloski (Tomsk) and Vechernie izvestiya (Irkutsk) in 1910 and 1918. In line with the editorial policy of the newspapers, oriented mainly towards the mass reader, who got an idea of the writer from publications in the press, parodies of contemporary authors’ works were perceived as a vivid characteristic, a kind of a literary portrait. The texts dedicated to Remizov ridiculed the specificity of his language and style, the peculiarities of his creative manner. His socio-political position, which was voiced in one of the key and iconic texts of the revolutionary time, “The Commandment to the Russian People”, was presented to the reader in an absolutely destructive ironic manner, distorting Remizov’s idea. As a result of the analysis, the author came to the conclusion about the formation of a controversial opinion about Remizov’s art, which developed both among the profane readers and the intellectuals. On the one hand, the analytical performances of Koltonovskaya and Chuzhak- Nasimovich contributed to the emergence of a deep and conscious appreciation of Remizov’s works; on the other hand, sporadic parodic critical responses deprived the reader of the opportunity to form a holistic view of the constants of the writer’s artistic world. Unlike numerous reviews published in St. Petersburg and Moscow, where Remizov’s artistic practices were perceived in the context of the contemporary historical and literary atmosphere, and the critics were analyzing the genesis of the author’s creative world, the publications of Siberian journalists aroused in readers feelings of antipathy, misunderstanding and rejection of Remizov’s manner rather than a desire to comprehend the specifics of the writer’s gift.
期刊介绍:
Tomsk State University Journal of Philology was established with the aim of: - publishing the papers and reviews on the topical issues of modern philology: linguistics, literary studies, communication studies; - promoting the development of theoretical and practical research in the field of socio-humanitarian knowledge; - forging links among scholars from different regions of Russia and other countries. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology is an independent research journal that welcomes submissions from across the world.