CORR Insights®:骨科领导角色中的女性比例是否反映了专业协会的性别构成?

M. Mulcahey
{"title":"CORR Insights®:骨科领导角色中的女性比例是否反映了专业协会的性别构成?","authors":"M. Mulcahey","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000000914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although women currently comprise of approximately half of all medical students, orthopaedic surgery has the lowest percentage of women residents of all medical specialties, at 14% in 2016-2017, which is up only slightly from 11% in 2005-2006 [3]. Several factors contribute to the continued gender disparity in orthopaedics, including medical students’ perceptions that the specialty is a physically demanding male-dominated field, beset with barriers to promotion and acceptance by senior faculty [2, 9]. A separate study surveying members of the Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society (RJOS) found that challenges related to work-life balance and a lack of strong mentorship contributed to the reluctance of women medical students to enter the field [10]. In addition to having a low proportion of women overall, less than 9% of full professors in orthopaedic surgery are women, the lowest percentage among all surgical specialties [4]. Improving gender diversity in orthopaedics will not happen until more women move up through the ranks; that process has been perpetually stagnant [2]. In the current study, Saxena and colleagues [11] highlighted the disparities between the gender distribution in the membership of a large number of subspecialty societies, and the gender breakdowns of the boards of directors of those societies. The authors queried the executive directors in each of the 23 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Board of Specialty Societies to determine the number and percentage of women members, the number of women on each society’s board of directors, the criteria for becoming a board member, and the presence or absence of a junior board member position (those younger than 45 years of age). The authors found a strong correlation between the percentage of women in a society and the percentage of women on the society’s board of directors [11]. The Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America had the highest percentage of women members (26%), but did not have the highest percentage of women on its board of directors (3 out of 20). The Orthopaedic Research Society had the highest percentage of women on its board of directors (7 out of 16), but did not have the highest percentage of women members (25%). The authors found no correlation between the presence of a junior board member position and the percentage of women in an orthopaedic society or the percentage of women on the board of directors in a society [11].","PeriodicalId":10465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CORR Insights®: Does the Proportion of Women in Orthopaedic Leadership Roles Reflect the Gender Composition of Specialty Societies?\",\"authors\":\"M. Mulcahey\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CORR.0000000000000914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although women currently comprise of approximately half of all medical students, orthopaedic surgery has the lowest percentage of women residents of all medical specialties, at 14% in 2016-2017, which is up only slightly from 11% in 2005-2006 [3]. Several factors contribute to the continued gender disparity in orthopaedics, including medical students’ perceptions that the specialty is a physically demanding male-dominated field, beset with barriers to promotion and acceptance by senior faculty [2, 9]. A separate study surveying members of the Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society (RJOS) found that challenges related to work-life balance and a lack of strong mentorship contributed to the reluctance of women medical students to enter the field [10]. In addition to having a low proportion of women overall, less than 9% of full professors in orthopaedic surgery are women, the lowest percentage among all surgical specialties [4]. Improving gender diversity in orthopaedics will not happen until more women move up through the ranks; that process has been perpetually stagnant [2]. In the current study, Saxena and colleagues [11] highlighted the disparities between the gender distribution in the membership of a large number of subspecialty societies, and the gender breakdowns of the boards of directors of those societies. The authors queried the executive directors in each of the 23 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Board of Specialty Societies to determine the number and percentage of women members, the number of women on each society’s board of directors, the criteria for becoming a board member, and the presence or absence of a junior board member position (those younger than 45 years of age). The authors found a strong correlation between the percentage of women in a society and the percentage of women on the society’s board of directors [11]. The Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America had the highest percentage of women members (26%), but did not have the highest percentage of women on its board of directors (3 out of 20). The Orthopaedic Research Society had the highest percentage of women on its board of directors (7 out of 16), but did not have the highest percentage of women members (25%). The authors found no correlation between the presence of a junior board member position and the percentage of women in an orthopaedic society or the percentage of women on the board of directors in a society [11].\",\"PeriodicalId\":10465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管目前女性约占所有医科学生的一半,但在所有医学专业中,骨科手术的女性住院医师比例最低,2016-2017年为14%,仅略高于2005-2006年的11%。有几个因素导致了骨科领域持续的性别差异,包括医学生认为该专业是一个以男性为主导的体力要求高的领域,受到高级教师晋升和接受障碍的困扰[2,9]。另一项调查露丝·杰克逊骨科学会(Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society, RJOS)成员的研究发现,与工作与生活平衡相关的挑战和缺乏强有力的指导是女医科学生不愿进入该领域的原因之一。除了总体上女性比例较低外,骨科正教授中只有不到9%是女性,这是所有外科专业中比例最低的。除非有更多的女性获得晋升,否则骨科行业的性别多样性不会得到改善;这一进程一直停滞不前。在目前的研究中,Saxena和同事[11]强调了大量亚专业协会成员性别分布的差异,以及这些协会董事会的性别细分。作者询问了美国骨科医师学会(American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons,简称AAOS) 23个专业学会董事会的执行董事,以确定女性成员的数量和百分比、每个学会董事会的女性人数、成为董事会成员的标准,以及初级董事会成员职位(年龄小于45岁)的存在与否。研究人员发现,一个社会的女性比例与该社会董事会的女性比例之间存在很强的相关性。北美儿科骨科学会(Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America)的女性会员比例最高(26%),但其董事会中女性的比例并不高(20人中有3人)。骨科研究学会(Orthopaedic Research Society)的董事会中女性比例最高(16人中有7人),但女性成员的比例并不高(25%)。作者发现,初级董事会成员职位的存在与骨科学会女性比例或学会董事会女性比例之间没有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CORR Insights®: Does the Proportion of Women in Orthopaedic Leadership Roles Reflect the Gender Composition of Specialty Societies?
Although women currently comprise of approximately half of all medical students, orthopaedic surgery has the lowest percentage of women residents of all medical specialties, at 14% in 2016-2017, which is up only slightly from 11% in 2005-2006 [3]. Several factors contribute to the continued gender disparity in orthopaedics, including medical students’ perceptions that the specialty is a physically demanding male-dominated field, beset with barriers to promotion and acceptance by senior faculty [2, 9]. A separate study surveying members of the Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society (RJOS) found that challenges related to work-life balance and a lack of strong mentorship contributed to the reluctance of women medical students to enter the field [10]. In addition to having a low proportion of women overall, less than 9% of full professors in orthopaedic surgery are women, the lowest percentage among all surgical specialties [4]. Improving gender diversity in orthopaedics will not happen until more women move up through the ranks; that process has been perpetually stagnant [2]. In the current study, Saxena and colleagues [11] highlighted the disparities between the gender distribution in the membership of a large number of subspecialty societies, and the gender breakdowns of the boards of directors of those societies. The authors queried the executive directors in each of the 23 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Board of Specialty Societies to determine the number and percentage of women members, the number of women on each society’s board of directors, the criteria for becoming a board member, and the presence or absence of a junior board member position (those younger than 45 years of age). The authors found a strong correlation between the percentage of women in a society and the percentage of women on the society’s board of directors [11]. The Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America had the highest percentage of women members (26%), but did not have the highest percentage of women on its board of directors (3 out of 20). The Orthopaedic Research Society had the highest percentage of women on its board of directors (7 out of 16), but did not have the highest percentage of women members (25%). The authors found no correlation between the presence of a junior board member position and the percentage of women in an orthopaedic society or the percentage of women on the board of directors in a society [11].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信