非洲卫生资源的五分位数分布

M. Cerf
{"title":"非洲卫生资源的五分位数分布","authors":"M. Cerf","doi":"10.1080/2331205X.2021.1997161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Africa has a limited health workforce that tackles the morbidity of complex, variable and highly prevalent diseases, often with limited resourcing. This study assesses health worker resourcing in African regions and countries stratified in quintiles (Q). African countries were categorized according to five regions viz. Northern, Western, Central, Eastern and Southern Africa. Each region was assessed according to the distribution of the (medical) doctor and nurse (and midwife) density, nurse to doctor ratio, and hospital bed density, followed by ranking of the health resources and even distribution across Q i.e. Q1-5, with Q1 reflecting the best resourced, Q2-4 intermediate resourced and Q5 the most under-resourced countries in Africa. The doctor and nurse densities, nurse to doctor ratio, and hospital bed availability in Q1 African countries were all higher compared to Q2-5 African countries, reflecting better health resourcing. Both nurse densities and nurse to doctor ratios were higher in Q2 African countries relative to Q4 and Q5 African countries; with hospital bed availability in Q2 African countries higher compared to Q3-5 African countries, and in Q3 African countries compared to Q5 African countries. The best resourced African countries (Q1) were better geared to provide decent healthcare, particularly those meeting global standard thresholds, whereas the remaining countries (Q2-4), and particularly the most under-resourced (Q5) countries, lagged the best resourced African countries, and face extreme challenges in providing decent healthcare. Health resourcing across Africa requires urgent strengthening to enable better healthcare delivery.","PeriodicalId":10470,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quintile distribution of health resourcing in Africa\",\"authors\":\"M. Cerf\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2331205X.2021.1997161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Africa has a limited health workforce that tackles the morbidity of complex, variable and highly prevalent diseases, often with limited resourcing. This study assesses health worker resourcing in African regions and countries stratified in quintiles (Q). African countries were categorized according to five regions viz. Northern, Western, Central, Eastern and Southern Africa. Each region was assessed according to the distribution of the (medical) doctor and nurse (and midwife) density, nurse to doctor ratio, and hospital bed density, followed by ranking of the health resources and even distribution across Q i.e. Q1-5, with Q1 reflecting the best resourced, Q2-4 intermediate resourced and Q5 the most under-resourced countries in Africa. The doctor and nurse densities, nurse to doctor ratio, and hospital bed availability in Q1 African countries were all higher compared to Q2-5 African countries, reflecting better health resourcing. Both nurse densities and nurse to doctor ratios were higher in Q2 African countries relative to Q4 and Q5 African countries; with hospital bed availability in Q2 African countries higher compared to Q3-5 African countries, and in Q3 African countries compared to Q5 African countries. The best resourced African countries (Q1) were better geared to provide decent healthcare, particularly those meeting global standard thresholds, whereas the remaining countries (Q2-4), and particularly the most under-resourced (Q5) countries, lagged the best resourced African countries, and face extreme challenges in providing decent healthcare. Health resourcing across Africa requires urgent strengthening to enable better healthcare delivery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cogent Medicine\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cogent Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2021.1997161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2021.1997161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

非洲的卫生人力资源有限,无法处理复杂、可变和高度流行的疾病的发病率,而且往往资源有限。本研究评估了按五分位数(Q)分层的非洲区域和国家的卫生工作者资源。非洲国家按五个区域进行分类,即北部、西部、中部、东部和南部非洲。根据(医疗)医生和护士(和助产士)密度、护士与医生比例和医院床位密度的分布对每个区域进行评估,然后对卫生资源进行排名,并在Q(即Q1-5)之间进行均匀分布,其中Q1反映了非洲资源最好的国家,Q2-4反映了资源中等的国家,Q5反映了资源最不足的国家。第一季度非洲国家的医生和护士密度、护士与医生的比例和医院床位供应情况均高于第二季度至第五季度的非洲国家,这反映出卫生资源的改善。第二季度非洲国家的护士密度和护士与医生的比率都高于第四季度和第五季度非洲国家;第二季度非洲国家的医院床位供应高于第三季度至第五季度非洲国家,第三季度非洲国家的医院床位供应高于第五季度非洲国家。资源最充足的非洲国家(第一季度)更有能力提供体面的医疗保健,特别是那些达到全球标准门槛的国家,而其余国家(第2-4季度),特别是资源最不足的国家(第5季度),落后于资源最充足的非洲国家,在提供体面的医疗保健方面面临极端挑战。非洲各地的卫生资源需要紧急加强,以便更好地提供保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quintile distribution of health resourcing in Africa
Abstract Africa has a limited health workforce that tackles the morbidity of complex, variable and highly prevalent diseases, often with limited resourcing. This study assesses health worker resourcing in African regions and countries stratified in quintiles (Q). African countries were categorized according to five regions viz. Northern, Western, Central, Eastern and Southern Africa. Each region was assessed according to the distribution of the (medical) doctor and nurse (and midwife) density, nurse to doctor ratio, and hospital bed density, followed by ranking of the health resources and even distribution across Q i.e. Q1-5, with Q1 reflecting the best resourced, Q2-4 intermediate resourced and Q5 the most under-resourced countries in Africa. The doctor and nurse densities, nurse to doctor ratio, and hospital bed availability in Q1 African countries were all higher compared to Q2-5 African countries, reflecting better health resourcing. Both nurse densities and nurse to doctor ratios were higher in Q2 African countries relative to Q4 and Q5 African countries; with hospital bed availability in Q2 African countries higher compared to Q3-5 African countries, and in Q3 African countries compared to Q5 African countries. The best resourced African countries (Q1) were better geared to provide decent healthcare, particularly those meeting global standard thresholds, whereas the remaining countries (Q2-4), and particularly the most under-resourced (Q5) countries, lagged the best resourced African countries, and face extreme challenges in providing decent healthcare. Health resourcing across Africa requires urgent strengthening to enable better healthcare delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信