人权与国家安全:肯尼亚的难民困境

Irene M. Maithya, Benta Morang'a
{"title":"人权与国家安全:肯尼亚的难民困境","authors":"Irene M. Maithya, Benta Morang'a","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3011911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Refugees existed as early as the times when religion is said to have begun. There are various books in the Bible for instance where refugees were said to be people who were homeless and needed special attention from the society. During the first and second world wars, millions of people were displaced in Europe and this led to creation of laws that would ensure the safety and protection of refugees. Later on as African states developed, they started experiencing challenges similar to the ones were being experienced in Europe and as a result the laws were revised to incorporate legal protections of the refugees in Africa. Kenya has hosted thousands of refugees from neighboring countries like South Sudan, Somalia and Uganda during the dictatorial rule of lddi Amin. However, the Daadab refugee camps established in 1991 to host Somali refugees fleeing clashes and subsequent civil wars after the ousting of Said Barre in January 1991 have posed more security concerns to Kenya. The persistent insecurity in Daadab refugee camps has put pressure on the Kenya government on the need to comply with its international human rights obligations by continually hosting refugees. It has emerged that these refugee camps have become a breeding ground of Al-shabaab activities. It is undisputed that human rights will always come first in all circumstances irrespective of whether one is a citizen or a refugee. But with national security on the other hand, how far can the state protect refugee rights? To what extent are host governments supposed to secure the rights of refugees when the security of its citizen’s is at stake? And finally, what is the scope of the refugee rights? How can Kenya strike a ‘happy medium’ by ensuring that it complies with its international human rights obligations by protecting the refugees whilst ensuring that there is no compromise on security? This study seeks to analyze the threat posed by refugees to security, the extent to which the state should protect refugees’ human rights and ensure that the security of its nationals is not compromised. The study finally attempts to suggest viable options that may mitigate the problem.","PeriodicalId":81320,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown immigration law journal","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Rights versus National Security: The Refugee Quagmire in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Irene M. Maithya, Benta Morang'a\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3011911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Refugees existed as early as the times when religion is said to have begun. There are various books in the Bible for instance where refugees were said to be people who were homeless and needed special attention from the society. During the first and second world wars, millions of people were displaced in Europe and this led to creation of laws that would ensure the safety and protection of refugees. Later on as African states developed, they started experiencing challenges similar to the ones were being experienced in Europe and as a result the laws were revised to incorporate legal protections of the refugees in Africa. Kenya has hosted thousands of refugees from neighboring countries like South Sudan, Somalia and Uganda during the dictatorial rule of lddi Amin. However, the Daadab refugee camps established in 1991 to host Somali refugees fleeing clashes and subsequent civil wars after the ousting of Said Barre in January 1991 have posed more security concerns to Kenya. The persistent insecurity in Daadab refugee camps has put pressure on the Kenya government on the need to comply with its international human rights obligations by continually hosting refugees. It has emerged that these refugee camps have become a breeding ground of Al-shabaab activities. It is undisputed that human rights will always come first in all circumstances irrespective of whether one is a citizen or a refugee. But with national security on the other hand, how far can the state protect refugee rights? To what extent are host governments supposed to secure the rights of refugees when the security of its citizen’s is at stake? And finally, what is the scope of the refugee rights? How can Kenya strike a ‘happy medium’ by ensuring that it complies with its international human rights obligations by protecting the refugees whilst ensuring that there is no compromise on security? This study seeks to analyze the threat posed by refugees to security, the extent to which the state should protect refugees’ human rights and ensure that the security of its nationals is not compromised. The study finally attempts to suggest viable options that may mitigate the problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgetown immigration law journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgetown immigration law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3011911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown immigration law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3011911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

难民早在据说宗教开始的时代就存在了。例如,圣经中有很多书说难民是无家可归的人,需要社会的特别关注。在第一次和第二次世界大战期间,数百万人在欧洲流离失所,这导致制定了确保难民安全和保护的法律。后来,随着非洲国家的发展,他们开始经历与欧洲所经历的类似的挑战,因此法律被修改,以纳入对非洲难民的法律保护。在阿明独裁统治期间,肯尼亚接待了数千名来自南苏丹、索马里和乌干达等邻国的难民。然而,1991年为收容逃离冲突和1991年1月赛义德·巴雷下台后内战的索马里难民而建立的达达布难民营给肯尼亚带来了更多的安全问题。达达布难民营持续的不安全状况给肯尼亚政府施加了压力,迫使其必须履行其国际人权义务,继续收容难民。这些难民营已成为青年党活动的温床。毫无疑问,人权在任何情况下都是第一位的,无论一个人是公民还是难民。但从国家安全的角度来看,国家能在多大程度上保护难民的权利?当本国公民的安全受到威胁时,东道国政府应该在多大程度上保障难民的权利?最后,难民权利的范围是什么?肯尼亚如何才能做到“中庸之道”,既能保护难民,又能确保安全不受损害,从而遵守国际人权义务?本研究旨在分析难民对安全构成的威胁,国家应在何种程度上保护难民的人权,并确保其国民的安全不受损害。该研究最后试图提出可行的方案,以缓解这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Rights versus National Security: The Refugee Quagmire in Kenya
Refugees existed as early as the times when religion is said to have begun. There are various books in the Bible for instance where refugees were said to be people who were homeless and needed special attention from the society. During the first and second world wars, millions of people were displaced in Europe and this led to creation of laws that would ensure the safety and protection of refugees. Later on as African states developed, they started experiencing challenges similar to the ones were being experienced in Europe and as a result the laws were revised to incorporate legal protections of the refugees in Africa. Kenya has hosted thousands of refugees from neighboring countries like South Sudan, Somalia and Uganda during the dictatorial rule of lddi Amin. However, the Daadab refugee camps established in 1991 to host Somali refugees fleeing clashes and subsequent civil wars after the ousting of Said Barre in January 1991 have posed more security concerns to Kenya. The persistent insecurity in Daadab refugee camps has put pressure on the Kenya government on the need to comply with its international human rights obligations by continually hosting refugees. It has emerged that these refugee camps have become a breeding ground of Al-shabaab activities. It is undisputed that human rights will always come first in all circumstances irrespective of whether one is a citizen or a refugee. But with national security on the other hand, how far can the state protect refugee rights? To what extent are host governments supposed to secure the rights of refugees when the security of its citizen’s is at stake? And finally, what is the scope of the refugee rights? How can Kenya strike a ‘happy medium’ by ensuring that it complies with its international human rights obligations by protecting the refugees whilst ensuring that there is no compromise on security? This study seeks to analyze the threat posed by refugees to security, the extent to which the state should protect refugees’ human rights and ensure that the security of its nationals is not compromised. The study finally attempts to suggest viable options that may mitigate the problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信