民事诉讼法学说及其对国家司法程序的重要性

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Nikolai V. Samsonov
{"title":"民事诉讼法学说及其对国家司法程序的重要性","authors":"Nikolai V. Samsonov","doi":"10.21638/spbu14.2022.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses approaches to the understanding legal doctrines that exist in legal science, in order to determine the essence of the civil procedure doctrine, to dissociate it from other related notions and to identify its importance for national judicial procedure. While using this basis, the author gives his definition of “the doctrine of civil procedure law” and gives a classification of legal doctrines. Furthermore, existing cases of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and other courts using civil procedure doctrine in order to motivate their decisions are studied. A conclusion is made that there is no judge’s perception of the doctrine as a source (a form) of law and it is only used as a supplementary argument not having a decisive character and being used along with rules of logic and of common sense. Among considerable factors preventing judges from using the legal doctrine in such a capacity, the author indicates its non-compliance with conditions of legal certainty and legally binding character and the lack of a mechanism for applying doctrinal provisions to civil judicial procedure, as well as the fact that the legal doctrine tends to be dispersed in other sources of law. As a result, the author suggests regarding the doctrine of civil procedure law not as a source (a form) of law, but as a source of legal knowledge providing basis for the emergence of law in a form of legislative act, legal case or other, as a phenomenon being a theoretical and methodological basis of legal system, giving future-oriented models of court organization and civil judicial procedure, legal regulation of legal procedure in courts of general jurisdiction concerning civil cases, a phenomenon having an impact on judges’ and other civil procedure participants’ legal conscience.","PeriodicalId":41041,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The doctrine of civil procedure law and its importance for national judicial procedure\",\"authors\":\"Nikolai V. Samsonov\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/spbu14.2022.208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyses approaches to the understanding legal doctrines that exist in legal science, in order to determine the essence of the civil procedure doctrine, to dissociate it from other related notions and to identify its importance for national judicial procedure. While using this basis, the author gives his definition of “the doctrine of civil procedure law” and gives a classification of legal doctrines. Furthermore, existing cases of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and other courts using civil procedure doctrine in order to motivate their decisions are studied. A conclusion is made that there is no judge’s perception of the doctrine as a source (a form) of law and it is only used as a supplementary argument not having a decisive character and being used along with rules of logic and of common sense. Among considerable factors preventing judges from using the legal doctrine in such a capacity, the author indicates its non-compliance with conditions of legal certainty and legally binding character and the lack of a mechanism for applying doctrinal provisions to civil judicial procedure, as well as the fact that the legal doctrine tends to be dispersed in other sources of law. As a result, the author suggests regarding the doctrine of civil procedure law not as a source (a form) of law, but as a source of legal knowledge providing basis for the emergence of law in a form of legislative act, legal case or other, as a phenomenon being a theoretical and methodological basis of legal system, giving future-oriented models of court organization and civil judicial procedure, legal regulation of legal procedure in courts of general jurisdiction concerning civil cases, a phenomenon having an impact on judges’ and other civil procedure participants’ legal conscience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2022.208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了法学中存在的理解法律学说的方法,以确定民事诉讼学说的本质,将其与其他相关概念分离开来,并确定其对国家司法程序的重要性。在此基础上,笔者对“民事诉讼法学说”进行了界定,并对法律学说进行了分类。此外,还研究了俄罗斯联邦宪法法院和其他法院利用民事诉讼原则作出决定的现有案例。结论是,法官不认为该学说是法律的来源(一种形式),它只是作为一种补充论证,不具有决定性,与逻辑规则和常识一起使用。在妨碍法官以这种身份使用法律原则的诸多因素中,作者指出,它不符合法律确定性和法律约束力的条件,缺乏将理论规定适用于民事司法程序的机制,以及法律原则往往分散在其他法源的事实。结果,作者建议关于民事诉讼法的原则而不是源(形式)的法律,但法律知识的来源提供依据法律的形式出现的立法行为,法律或其他情况下,作为一个现象作为一个法律体系的理论和方法论基础,面向未来的法院组织模型和民事司法程序,法律规定的法定程序一般管辖权法院关于民事案件,一种影响法官和其他民事诉讼参与人法律良知的现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The doctrine of civil procedure law and its importance for national judicial procedure
The article analyses approaches to the understanding legal doctrines that exist in legal science, in order to determine the essence of the civil procedure doctrine, to dissociate it from other related notions and to identify its importance for national judicial procedure. While using this basis, the author gives his definition of “the doctrine of civil procedure law” and gives a classification of legal doctrines. Furthermore, existing cases of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and other courts using civil procedure doctrine in order to motivate their decisions are studied. A conclusion is made that there is no judge’s perception of the doctrine as a source (a form) of law and it is only used as a supplementary argument not having a decisive character and being used along with rules of logic and of common sense. Among considerable factors preventing judges from using the legal doctrine in such a capacity, the author indicates its non-compliance with conditions of legal certainty and legally binding character and the lack of a mechanism for applying doctrinal provisions to civil judicial procedure, as well as the fact that the legal doctrine tends to be dispersed in other sources of law. As a result, the author suggests regarding the doctrine of civil procedure law not as a source (a form) of law, but as a source of legal knowledge providing basis for the emergence of law in a form of legislative act, legal case or other, as a phenomenon being a theoretical and methodological basis of legal system, giving future-oriented models of court organization and civil judicial procedure, legal regulation of legal procedure in courts of general jurisdiction concerning civil cases, a phenomenon having an impact on judges’ and other civil procedure participants’ legal conscience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信