uadj和Sadj两种分数调整方案研究

Chuanyi Li
{"title":"uadj和Sadj两种分数调整方案研究","authors":"Chuanyi Li","doi":"10.1109/ICIST.2011.5765173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rating inconsistency in subjective rating between two raters may result in the fact that the score the examinee got departs from his real ability. And artificial rerating process is both time consuming and laborious. So the author in this paper applied the Uadj Scheme and the Sadj Scheme to HSK (advanced) essay scores to examine rating errors and to compare these two schemes. The study shows that both of these two schemes can diminish raters' errors and promote rating efficiency, which therefore can be substitutes for raters' rerating and that compared with the Sadj Scheme, the Uadj Scheme is superior.","PeriodicalId":6408,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology","volume":"60 1","pages":"1148-1150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on two score adjustment schemes—Uadj and Sadj\",\"authors\":\"Chuanyi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIST.2011.5765173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rating inconsistency in subjective rating between two raters may result in the fact that the score the examinee got departs from his real ability. And artificial rerating process is both time consuming and laborious. So the author in this paper applied the Uadj Scheme and the Sadj Scheme to HSK (advanced) essay scores to examine rating errors and to compare these two schemes. The study shows that both of these two schemes can diminish raters' errors and promote rating efficiency, which therefore can be substitutes for raters' rerating and that compared with the Sadj Scheme, the Uadj Scheme is superior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"1148-1150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2011.5765173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2011.5765173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两名评分员主观评分的不一致可能导致考生的得分偏离其真实能力。而人工评分过程既费时又费力。因此,本文将Uadj方案和Sadj方案应用于HSK(高级)作文成绩中,考察两种方案的评分误差,并对这两种方案进行比较。研究表明,这两种方案都可以减少评分员的错误率,提高评分效率,因此可以替代评分员的评分,并且与Sadj方案相比,Uadj方案更具优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on two score adjustment schemes—Uadj and Sadj
The rating inconsistency in subjective rating between two raters may result in the fact that the score the examinee got departs from his real ability. And artificial rerating process is both time consuming and laborious. So the author in this paper applied the Uadj Scheme and the Sadj Scheme to HSK (advanced) essay scores to examine rating errors and to compare these two schemes. The study shows that both of these two schemes can diminish raters' errors and promote rating efficiency, which therefore can be substitutes for raters' rerating and that compared with the Sadj Scheme, the Uadj Scheme is superior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信