社区的作用是什么?研究男同性恋和双性恋中的少数群体压力过程。

Q2 Social Sciences
Nonproliferation Review Pub Date : 2019-08-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-02 DOI:10.1037/sah0000143
Brian Salfas, H Jonathon Rendina, Jeffrey T Parsons
{"title":"社区的作用是什么?研究男同性恋和双性恋中的少数群体压力过程。","authors":"Brian Salfas, H Jonathon Rendina, Jeffrey T Parsons","doi":"10.1037/sah0000143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gay and bisexual men suffer from higher rates of mental health disorders than their heterosexual counterparts. Minority stress theory provides the framework for much research that seeks to explain this discrepancy. Recently, several studies have also examined the role of connection with the gay community with mixed results. Operationalizing gay community connectedness in terms of two separate constructs-community involvement and community identification-this study sought to examine and compare the role that each of these factors plays in affecting gay and bisexual men's mental health. We analyzed data from 371 gay and bisexual men in New York City, focusing on measures of minority stress factors, gay community connectedness, and mental health outcomes. As hypothesized, factor analysis showed that the community connectedness scale loaded onto two sub-factors corresponding to the theorized constructs of identification and involvement. Linear regression models adjusting for potential confounding factors showed that community involvement was significantly associated with better mental health outcomes. Community involvement also significantly moderated the impact of internalized homonegativity on mental health. This factor was not a significant moderator of the impact of sexual orientation discrimination on mental health, and community identification was not significantly associated with mental health outcomes. It also did not significantly moderate the effect of either minority stress factor. Future research would benefit from developing an updated and highly reliable measure of community involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":35157,"journal":{"name":"Nonproliferation Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"300-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the Role of the Community? Examining Minority Stress Processes among Gay and Bisexual Men.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Salfas, H Jonathon Rendina, Jeffrey T Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/sah0000143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gay and bisexual men suffer from higher rates of mental health disorders than their heterosexual counterparts. Minority stress theory provides the framework for much research that seeks to explain this discrepancy. Recently, several studies have also examined the role of connection with the gay community with mixed results. Operationalizing gay community connectedness in terms of two separate constructs-community involvement and community identification-this study sought to examine and compare the role that each of these factors plays in affecting gay and bisexual men's mental health. We analyzed data from 371 gay and bisexual men in New York City, focusing on measures of minority stress factors, gay community connectedness, and mental health outcomes. As hypothesized, factor analysis showed that the community connectedness scale loaded onto two sub-factors corresponding to the theorized constructs of identification and involvement. Linear regression models adjusting for potential confounding factors showed that community involvement was significantly associated with better mental health outcomes. Community involvement also significantly moderated the impact of internalized homonegativity on mental health. This factor was not a significant moderator of the impact of sexual orientation discrimination on mental health, and community identification was not significantly associated with mental health outcomes. It also did not significantly moderate the effect of either minority stress factor. Future research would benefit from developing an updated and highly reliable measure of community involvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nonproliferation Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"300-309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6724721/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nonproliferation Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/7/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonproliferation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

男同性恋者和双性恋者患精神疾病的比例高于异性恋者。少数群体压力理论为许多试图解释这种差异的研究提供了框架。最近,一些研究也探讨了与男同性恋社区联系的作用,结果喜忧参半。本研究从社区参与和社区认同这两个不同的概念出发,对男同性恋社区联系进行了操作性研究,旨在考察和比较这两个因素在影响男同性恋和双性恋男性心理健康方面所起的作用。我们分析了来自纽约市 371 名男同性恋者和双性恋者的数据,重点研究了少数群体压力因素、男同性恋者社区联系和心理健康结果。正如假设的那样,因子分析显示,社区联系量表有两个子因子,分别对应于理论上的认同和参与。调整了潜在混杂因素的线性回归模型显示,社区参与与更好的心理健康结果有显著关联。社区参与还能明显调节内化的同一性对心理健康的影响。这一因素对性取向歧视对心理健康的影响没有明显的调节作用,社区认同与心理健康结果也没有明显的关联。此外,它也没有明显调节少数群体压力因素的影响。未来的研究将受益于开发一种最新的、高度可靠的社区参与测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is the Role of the Community? Examining Minority Stress Processes among Gay and Bisexual Men.

Gay and bisexual men suffer from higher rates of mental health disorders than their heterosexual counterparts. Minority stress theory provides the framework for much research that seeks to explain this discrepancy. Recently, several studies have also examined the role of connection with the gay community with mixed results. Operationalizing gay community connectedness in terms of two separate constructs-community involvement and community identification-this study sought to examine and compare the role that each of these factors plays in affecting gay and bisexual men's mental health. We analyzed data from 371 gay and bisexual men in New York City, focusing on measures of minority stress factors, gay community connectedness, and mental health outcomes. As hypothesized, factor analysis showed that the community connectedness scale loaded onto two sub-factors corresponding to the theorized constructs of identification and involvement. Linear regression models adjusting for potential confounding factors showed that community involvement was significantly associated with better mental health outcomes. Community involvement also significantly moderated the impact of internalized homonegativity on mental health. This factor was not a significant moderator of the impact of sexual orientation discrimination on mental health, and community identification was not significantly associated with mental health outcomes. It also did not significantly moderate the effect of either minority stress factor. Future research would benefit from developing an updated and highly reliable measure of community involvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nonproliferation Review
Nonproliferation Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信