回到海曼岛:回顾澳大利亚85年后唯一有记录的锥螺死亡事件

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences
J. Healy
{"title":"回到海曼岛:回顾澳大利亚85年后唯一有记录的锥螺死亡事件","authors":"J. Healy","doi":"10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2021.2020-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The death of Charles Hugh Garbutt from a cone snail ‘sting’ inflicted at Hayman Island on the Great Barrier Reef marked both a family tragedy and an important moment in Australian medical and malacological history. However, aside from newspaper reports and the few witness statements given at the coronial inquiry, the events of that day in June 1935 and its immediate aftermath have never been critically evaluated. As memories of what happened have either faded or been partly distorted with the passage of time, the fatality today remains only a footnote in the history of studies on the Conidae and their complex, pharmaceutically-valuable venoms. The species involved, Conus geographus Linnaeus, 1758, is now recognised as the most dangerous to humans of the Conidae and responsible for most and possibly all recorded fatalities. After 85 years, the case is revisited using available evidence including newspaper reports, relevant scientific and popular literature, witness statements, archival documents and the actual specimen responsible for the fatality. While tragic and probably avoidable, the death, via its extensive coverage by the press, undoubtedly has helped to save lives by educating a public largely unaware of the dangers from something as seemingly harmless as a sea snail. It is also concluded that Charles Garbutt, when all factors are considered, was most unfortunate to have lost his life in the way that he did. For future cone envenomations it is recommended that photography (if possible) of the specimen involved would assist both in patient reassurance and medical treatment.","PeriodicalId":35552,"journal":{"name":"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A return to Hayman Island: revisiting Australia’s only recorded cone snail fatality after 85 years\",\"authors\":\"J. Healy\",\"doi\":\"10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2021.2020-09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The death of Charles Hugh Garbutt from a cone snail ‘sting’ inflicted at Hayman Island on the Great Barrier Reef marked both a family tragedy and an important moment in Australian medical and malacological history. However, aside from newspaper reports and the few witness statements given at the coronial inquiry, the events of that day in June 1935 and its immediate aftermath have never been critically evaluated. As memories of what happened have either faded or been partly distorted with the passage of time, the fatality today remains only a footnote in the history of studies on the Conidae and their complex, pharmaceutically-valuable venoms. The species involved, Conus geographus Linnaeus, 1758, is now recognised as the most dangerous to humans of the Conidae and responsible for most and possibly all recorded fatalities. After 85 years, the case is revisited using available evidence including newspaper reports, relevant scientific and popular literature, witness statements, archival documents and the actual specimen responsible for the fatality. While tragic and probably avoidable, the death, via its extensive coverage by the press, undoubtedly has helped to save lives by educating a public largely unaware of the dangers from something as seemingly harmless as a sea snail. It is also concluded that Charles Garbutt, when all factors are considered, was most unfortunate to have lost his life in the way that he did. For future cone envenomations it is recommended that photography (if possible) of the specimen involved would assist both in patient reassurance and medical treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2021.2020-09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memoirs of the Queensland Museum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17082/j.2204-1478.63.2021.2020-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

查尔斯·休·加布特在大堡礁的海曼岛被锥蜗牛“蜇伤”致死,这既是一个家庭悲剧,也是澳大利亚医学史上的一个重要时刻。然而,除了报纸报道和在验尸调查中提供的少数证人陈述外,1935年6月那天发生的事件及其直接后果从未得到批判性评价。随着时间的推移,人们对所发生的事情的记忆要么逐渐消失,要么部分被扭曲,因此,在对孢子科及其复杂的、具有药用价值的毒液的研究历史上,今天的死亡仍然只是一个注脚。所涉及的Conus geographus Linnaeus, 1758年,现在被认为是对人类最危险的锥虫科物种,造成了大多数甚至可能所有有记录的死亡。85年后,人们利用现有证据,包括报纸报道、相关科学和通俗文学、证人陈述、档案文件和造成死亡的实际标本,重新审视此案。虽然这是一场悲剧,而且很可能是可以避免的,但通过媒体的广泛报道,这起死亡事件无疑帮助挽救了生命,因为它教育了公众,使他们在很大程度上没有意识到海螺这种看似无害的东西的危险。文章还得出结论,考虑到所有因素,查尔斯·加巴特以这种方式失去生命是最不幸的。对于未来的锥病毒感染,建议对相关标本进行摄影(如果可能的话),这将有助于患者的安心和医学治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A return to Hayman Island: revisiting Australia’s only recorded cone snail fatality after 85 years
The death of Charles Hugh Garbutt from a cone snail ‘sting’ inflicted at Hayman Island on the Great Barrier Reef marked both a family tragedy and an important moment in Australian medical and malacological history. However, aside from newspaper reports and the few witness statements given at the coronial inquiry, the events of that day in June 1935 and its immediate aftermath have never been critically evaluated. As memories of what happened have either faded or been partly distorted with the passage of time, the fatality today remains only a footnote in the history of studies on the Conidae and their complex, pharmaceutically-valuable venoms. The species involved, Conus geographus Linnaeus, 1758, is now recognised as the most dangerous to humans of the Conidae and responsible for most and possibly all recorded fatalities. After 85 years, the case is revisited using available evidence including newspaper reports, relevant scientific and popular literature, witness statements, archival documents and the actual specimen responsible for the fatality. While tragic and probably avoidable, the death, via its extensive coverage by the press, undoubtedly has helped to save lives by educating a public largely unaware of the dangers from something as seemingly harmless as a sea snail. It is also concluded that Charles Garbutt, when all factors are considered, was most unfortunate to have lost his life in the way that he did. For future cone envenomations it is recommended that photography (if possible) of the specimen involved would assist both in patient reassurance and medical treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Memoirs of the Queensland Museum
Memoirs of the Queensland Museum Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信