{"title":"V-Possum评分作为血管内主动脉瘤修复术后30天死亡率的预测因子——Cipto Mangunkusumo医院的胸椎血管内动脉瘤修复手术","authors":"Irwan Mulyantara, R. Suhartono, A. Kekalih","doi":"10.36864/jinasvs.2020.1.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aims to know the performance of the Vascular – Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (V-POSSUM) score as a predictor of 30-day mortality after the Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) – Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) procedure in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) and Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms (TAA) patients in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital.\n\nMethod: This was a retrospective cohort study using data from medical records. Data were taken according to the variables contained in the V-POSSUM scoring system in the patient who undergone EVAR – TEVAR procedure, on the period of 2013 to July 2018.\n\nResults: The study involved 85 patients who met the study requirements. It was known that physiological scores, morbidity risk, and mortality risk could be used as a model to predict mortality outcomes because they had good accuracy and discrimination performance, while the severity of the operation score cannot. The result of the goodness of fit model’s physiological score, morbidity risk, and mortality risk was significant (p <0.001), while the severity score of the operation was 0.18 (p >0.05). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 94%, 93%, 93%, with the cut points at 31, 68.8, and 10.6 for the physiological score, morbidity risk, and mortality risk, respectively.\n\nConclusion: The V-POSSUM score had good accuracy and discrimination for the physiological score, morbidity risk, and mortality risk.\n\nKeywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm, thoracic aortic aneurysm, EVAR, TEVAR, V-POSSUM score, validation","PeriodicalId":60152,"journal":{"name":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"V-Possum Score as a Predictor of 30-Day Post-Mortality of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair – Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Procedure in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital\",\"authors\":\"Irwan Mulyantara, R. Suhartono, A. Kekalih\",\"doi\":\"10.36864/jinasvs.2020.1.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: This study aims to know the performance of the Vascular – Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (V-POSSUM) score as a predictor of 30-day mortality after the Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) – Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) procedure in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) and Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms (TAA) patients in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital.\\n\\nMethod: This was a retrospective cohort study using data from medical records. Data were taken according to the variables contained in the V-POSSUM scoring system in the patient who undergone EVAR – TEVAR procedure, on the period of 2013 to July 2018.\\n\\nResults: The study involved 85 patients who met the study requirements. It was known that physiological scores, morbidity risk, and mortality risk could be used as a model to predict mortality outcomes because they had good accuracy and discrimination performance, while the severity of the operation score cannot. The result of the goodness of fit model’s physiological score, morbidity risk, and mortality risk was significant (p <0.001), while the severity score of the operation was 0.18 (p >0.05). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 94%, 93%, 93%, with the cut points at 31, 68.8, and 10.6 for the physiological score, morbidity risk, and mortality risk, respectively.\\n\\nConclusion: The V-POSSUM score had good accuracy and discrimination for the physiological score, morbidity risk, and mortality risk.\\n\\nKeywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm, thoracic aortic aneurysm, EVAR, TEVAR, V-POSSUM score, validation\",\"PeriodicalId\":60152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"血管与腔内血管外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"血管与腔内血管外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36864/jinasvs.2020.1.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"血管与腔内血管外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36864/jinasvs.2020.1.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前言:本研究旨在了解在Cipto Mangunkusumo医院腹主动脉瘤(AAA)和胸主动脉瘤(TAA)患者行血管内动脉瘤修复(EVAR) -胸血管内主动脉修复(TEVAR)手术后30天死亡率的血管生理和手术严重程度评分(V-POSSUM)评分的表现。方法:采用病历资料进行回顾性队列研究。根据2013年至2018年7月期间接受EVAR - TEVAR手术的患者的V-POSSUM评分系统中包含的变量获取数据。结果:本研究纳入了85例符合研究要求的患者。已知生理评分、发病风险和死亡风险可以作为预测死亡结局的模型,因为它们具有较好的准确性和判别性能,而手术评分的严重程度则不能。拟合优度模型的生理评分、发病风险、死亡风险均有显著性差异(p < 0.05)。曲线下面积(Area Under The Curve, AUC)分别为94%、93%、93%,生理评分、发病风险和死亡风险的切点分别为31、68.8和10.6。结论:V-POSSUM评分对生理评分、发病风险和死亡风险具有较好的准确性和辨别性。关键词:腹主动脉瘤,胸主动脉瘤,EVAR, TEVAR, V-POSSUM评分,验证
V-Possum Score as a Predictor of 30-Day Post-Mortality of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair – Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Procedure in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital
Introduction: This study aims to know the performance of the Vascular – Physiological and Operative Severity Score for Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (V-POSSUM) score as a predictor of 30-day mortality after the Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) – Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) procedure in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) and Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms (TAA) patients in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital.
Method: This was a retrospective cohort study using data from medical records. Data were taken according to the variables contained in the V-POSSUM scoring system in the patient who undergone EVAR – TEVAR procedure, on the period of 2013 to July 2018.
Results: The study involved 85 patients who met the study requirements. It was known that physiological scores, morbidity risk, and mortality risk could be used as a model to predict mortality outcomes because they had good accuracy and discrimination performance, while the severity of the operation score cannot. The result of the goodness of fit model’s physiological score, morbidity risk, and mortality risk was significant (p <0.001), while the severity score of the operation was 0.18 (p >0.05). The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was 94%, 93%, 93%, with the cut points at 31, 68.8, and 10.6 for the physiological score, morbidity risk, and mortality risk, respectively.
Conclusion: The V-POSSUM score had good accuracy and discrimination for the physiological score, morbidity risk, and mortality risk.
Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm, thoracic aortic aneurysm, EVAR, TEVAR, V-POSSUM score, validation