死亡率与烟草消费:人口归因分数法作为估计危害的工具

Q4 Medicine
M. Giorgi
{"title":"死亡率与烟草消费:人口归因分数法作为估计危害的工具","authors":"M. Giorgi","doi":"10.7775/rac.v91.i3.20644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do all risk factors influence the incidence of events in the same way? The answer is “no”, and one of the main reasons mentioned by some cardiovascular medicine specialists is the INTERHEART study (1), which shows that the magnitude of the association among nine conditions or cardiovascular risk factors is heterogeneous with respect to the incidence of a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). For example, the odds ratios (ORs) observed were 1) 1.91 for history of arterial hypertension; 2) 2.37 for diabetes; 3) 2.87 for smoking (smokers vs. non-smokers); 4) 3.25 for an elevated ApoB/ApoA1 ratio, among others. This information has had healthcare consequences: it provided us with evidence to establish a hierarchy or prioritization of health problems in order to avoid overwhelming patients and support their long-term efforts. However, the INTERHEART study also provided population health information by widely spreading the concept of risk or population attributable fraction (PAF) –a “measure to estimate the proportion of cases that are attributed to a given exposure”– among healthcare professionals. (2) Thus, considering the contribution of each of these risk factors to the incidence of a first AMI event, the hierarchy defined by the ORs was modified since the PAF was 1) 49.2% for an elevated ApoB/ApoA1 ratio; 2) 35.7% for smoking; 3) 17.9% for history of arterial hypertension; and 4) 3.9% for diabetes. Same data, but different information: on the one hand, a more “clinical-related” perspective and, on the other hand, an epidemiologicalrelated perspective. The epidemiological perspective is used to understand population health problems, evaluate the results of the actions (or lack of actions) and propose improvements. The epidemiological approach has had some relevant milestones in our country and in the region, such as the publications of the CARMELA Study (3,4) and the National Survey of Risk Factors conducted","PeriodicalId":34966,"journal":{"name":"Revista Argentina de Cardiologia","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality and Tobacco Consumption: the Population Attributable Fraction Method as a Tool to Estimate Damage\",\"authors\":\"M. Giorgi\",\"doi\":\"10.7775/rac.v91.i3.20644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Do all risk factors influence the incidence of events in the same way? The answer is “no”, and one of the main reasons mentioned by some cardiovascular medicine specialists is the INTERHEART study (1), which shows that the magnitude of the association among nine conditions or cardiovascular risk factors is heterogeneous with respect to the incidence of a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). For example, the odds ratios (ORs) observed were 1) 1.91 for history of arterial hypertension; 2) 2.37 for diabetes; 3) 2.87 for smoking (smokers vs. non-smokers); 4) 3.25 for an elevated ApoB/ApoA1 ratio, among others. This information has had healthcare consequences: it provided us with evidence to establish a hierarchy or prioritization of health problems in order to avoid overwhelming patients and support their long-term efforts. However, the INTERHEART study also provided population health information by widely spreading the concept of risk or population attributable fraction (PAF) –a “measure to estimate the proportion of cases that are attributed to a given exposure”– among healthcare professionals. (2) Thus, considering the contribution of each of these risk factors to the incidence of a first AMI event, the hierarchy defined by the ORs was modified since the PAF was 1) 49.2% for an elevated ApoB/ApoA1 ratio; 2) 35.7% for smoking; 3) 17.9% for history of arterial hypertension; and 4) 3.9% for diabetes. Same data, but different information: on the one hand, a more “clinical-related” perspective and, on the other hand, an epidemiologicalrelated perspective. The epidemiological perspective is used to understand population health problems, evaluate the results of the actions (or lack of actions) and propose improvements. The epidemiological approach has had some relevant milestones in our country and in the region, such as the publications of the CARMELA Study (3,4) and the National Survey of Risk Factors conducted\",\"PeriodicalId\":34966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Argentina de Cardiologia\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Argentina de Cardiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.v91.i3.20644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Argentina de Cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7775/rac.v91.i3.20644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

是否所有的危险因素都以同样的方式影响事件的发生?答案是否定的,一些心血管医学专家提到的主要原因之一是INTERHEART研究(1),该研究表明,就首次急性心肌梗死(AMI)的发病率而言,九种疾病或心血管危险因素之间的关联程度是不均匀的。例如,观察到的优势比(ORs)为1)动脉高血压病史为1.91;2)糖尿病2.37;3)吸烟(吸烟者与非吸烟者)2.87;4) ApoB/ApoA1比值升高为3.25。这些信息对医疗保健产生了影响:它为我们提供了建立健康问题等级或优先级的证据,以避免使患者不堪重负,并支持他们的长期努力。然而,INTERHEART研究还通过在医疗保健专业人员中广泛传播风险或人口归因分数(PAF)的概念提供了人口健康信息。PAF是一种“估计归因于特定暴露的病例比例的措施”。(2)因此,考虑到这些危险因素对首次AMI事件发生率的贡献,修改了ORs定义的等级,因为ApoB/ApoA1比值升高的PAF为1)49.2%;2)吸烟占35.7%;3)动脉高血压病史17.9%;4) 3.9%为糖尿病。同样的数据,但不同的信息:一方面,一个更“临床相关”的角度,另一方面,一个流行病学相关的角度。流行病学观点用于了解人口健康问题,评估行动(或缺乏行动)的结果并提出改进建议。流行病学方法在我国和该地区具有一些相关的里程碑意义,例如发表了CARMELA研究报告(3,4)和开展的全国风险因素调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mortality and Tobacco Consumption: the Population Attributable Fraction Method as a Tool to Estimate Damage
Do all risk factors influence the incidence of events in the same way? The answer is “no”, and one of the main reasons mentioned by some cardiovascular medicine specialists is the INTERHEART study (1), which shows that the magnitude of the association among nine conditions or cardiovascular risk factors is heterogeneous with respect to the incidence of a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). For example, the odds ratios (ORs) observed were 1) 1.91 for history of arterial hypertension; 2) 2.37 for diabetes; 3) 2.87 for smoking (smokers vs. non-smokers); 4) 3.25 for an elevated ApoB/ApoA1 ratio, among others. This information has had healthcare consequences: it provided us with evidence to establish a hierarchy or prioritization of health problems in order to avoid overwhelming patients and support their long-term efforts. However, the INTERHEART study also provided population health information by widely spreading the concept of risk or population attributable fraction (PAF) –a “measure to estimate the proportion of cases that are attributed to a given exposure”– among healthcare professionals. (2) Thus, considering the contribution of each of these risk factors to the incidence of a first AMI event, the hierarchy defined by the ORs was modified since the PAF was 1) 49.2% for an elevated ApoB/ApoA1 ratio; 2) 35.7% for smoking; 3) 17.9% for history of arterial hypertension; and 4) 3.9% for diabetes. Same data, but different information: on the one hand, a more “clinical-related” perspective and, on the other hand, an epidemiologicalrelated perspective. The epidemiological perspective is used to understand population health problems, evaluate the results of the actions (or lack of actions) and propose improvements. The epidemiological approach has had some relevant milestones in our country and in the region, such as the publications of the CARMELA Study (3,4) and the National Survey of Risk Factors conducted
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Argentina de Cardiologia
Revista Argentina de Cardiologia Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信