为世界服务的王朝权威:霍亨索伦的政治遗嘱(1667-1768)

Françoise Knopper
{"title":"为世界服务的王朝权威:霍亨索伦的政治遗嘱(1667-1768)","authors":"Françoise Knopper","doi":"10.3406/CALIB.2005.1557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In their political testaments, the absolutist sovereigns of Brandenburg profess their calvinism, justify the meddling of political authority with religious affairs, reason in terms of religious legitimacy and of dynastic specificity. The genre of the political testament, half-public, half-private, enables us to analyze the way in which those princes chose to advocate a rigorous, hard-working, money-saving behaviour, and also used to quote Scripture, appeal to Christ and confess their fear of death Our aim will be to compare the passages which each of them devoted to religion and to decide whether a pronounced evolution could be noticed in the course of four successive generations. The Great Elector's testament (1667) is characterized by some proselytism and is echoed by his son's, the first King in Prussia. Tormented by religious issues, the Sergeant-King, Frederick-William I (1722) seems to stay close to the lutheran conception of authority, thus reconciling his own political project with a doctrine of predestination which preoccupied him. Even Frederick II, who admired Voltaire and was hostile to any kind of superstition or enthusiasm, claimed he was the Pope of the Lutherans and the Head of the Reformed Church (1752 /1768).","PeriodicalId":31138,"journal":{"name":"Anglophonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L’autorité dynastique au service de la Parole : les testaments politiques des Hohenzollern (1667-1768)\",\"authors\":\"Françoise Knopper\",\"doi\":\"10.3406/CALIB.2005.1557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In their political testaments, the absolutist sovereigns of Brandenburg profess their calvinism, justify the meddling of political authority with religious affairs, reason in terms of religious legitimacy and of dynastic specificity. The genre of the political testament, half-public, half-private, enables us to analyze the way in which those princes chose to advocate a rigorous, hard-working, money-saving behaviour, and also used to quote Scripture, appeal to Christ and confess their fear of death Our aim will be to compare the passages which each of them devoted to religion and to decide whether a pronounced evolution could be noticed in the course of four successive generations. The Great Elector's testament (1667) is characterized by some proselytism and is echoed by his son's, the first King in Prussia. Tormented by religious issues, the Sergeant-King, Frederick-William I (1722) seems to stay close to the lutheran conception of authority, thus reconciling his own political project with a doctrine of predestination which preoccupied him. Even Frederick II, who admired Voltaire and was hostile to any kind of superstition or enthusiasm, claimed he was the Pope of the Lutherans and the Head of the Reformed Church (1752 /1768).\",\"PeriodicalId\":31138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anglophonia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anglophonia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3406/CALIB.2005.1557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anglophonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/CALIB.2005.1557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在他们的政治遗嘱中,勃兰登堡的专制君主宣称他们的加尔文主义,为政治权威干预宗教事务辩护,从宗教合法性和王朝特殊性的角度进行推理。政治遗嘱的类型,半公开,半私人,使我们能够分析这些王子选择提倡严谨,勤劳,省钱的行为的方式,也用来引用圣经,呼吁基督,承认他们对死亡的恐惧。我们的目的是比较他们每个人都致力于宗教的段落,并决定是否明显的进化可以在连续四代的过程中被注意到。大选帝侯的遗嘱(1667年)的特点是一些改变宗教信仰,他的儿子,普鲁士第一任国王的遗嘱也与之相呼应。受到宗教问题的折磨,中士国王弗雷德里克-威廉一世(1722年)似乎与路德教的权威观念保持密切联系,从而使他自己的政治计划与他所关注的宿命论学说相协调。就连崇拜伏尔泰、反对任何迷信或狂热的腓特烈二世也声称伏尔泰是路德宗的教皇和改革宗教会的领袖(1752 /1768)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
L’autorité dynastique au service de la Parole : les testaments politiques des Hohenzollern (1667-1768)
In their political testaments, the absolutist sovereigns of Brandenburg profess their calvinism, justify the meddling of political authority with religious affairs, reason in terms of religious legitimacy and of dynastic specificity. The genre of the political testament, half-public, half-private, enables us to analyze the way in which those princes chose to advocate a rigorous, hard-working, money-saving behaviour, and also used to quote Scripture, appeal to Christ and confess their fear of death Our aim will be to compare the passages which each of them devoted to religion and to decide whether a pronounced evolution could be noticed in the course of four successive generations. The Great Elector's testament (1667) is characterized by some proselytism and is echoed by his son's, the first King in Prussia. Tormented by religious issues, the Sergeant-King, Frederick-William I (1722) seems to stay close to the lutheran conception of authority, thus reconciling his own political project with a doctrine of predestination which preoccupied him. Even Frederick II, who admired Voltaire and was hostile to any kind of superstition or enthusiasm, claimed he was the Pope of the Lutherans and the Head of the Reformed Church (1752 /1768).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信