{"title":"维基解密对世界舆论影响的策略和原因/维基解密对世界舆论影响的策略和原因","authors":"Alberto Quian, C. Elías","doi":"10.5477/CIS/REIS.162.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEsta investigacion intenta explicar cuando, como y por que emerge WikiLeaks como fenomeno global sistematizando sus estrategias mediaticas en tres claras etapas. Usamos herramientas de analitica web para recoger datos de cuatro niveles de popularidad digital: busquedas en Google, acceso al sitio web de WikiLeaks, presencia y seguidores en Twitter. Se analizan mas de 5 anos (desde su nacimiento en 2006 hasta la filtracion de Stratfor en 2012). Nuestros resultados indican que, en la era de la sociedad red, la popularidad de un fenomeno digital y antisistema como WikiLeaks (y el impacto de sus mensajes) depende, paradojicamente, de su difusion en la prensa tradicional de papel (quality press)que aun conserva su influencia y poder legitimador. EnglishThis study explains when, how and why WikiLeaks emerged as a global phenomenon. Its media strategies were clearly systematised into three stages. Web analytics tools were used to collect data from four different levels of digital popularity: Google searches for the term ?WikiLeaks?, ?WikiLeaks? website traffic, Twitter activity and Twitter followers. Data for more than five years were analysed (from December 2006, when WikiLeaks arose, to the Stratfor case, in 2012). Our results indicate that, in the age of the network society, the popularity of a digital and antiestablishment phenomenon such as WikiLeaks (and the impact of its messages) paradoxically depends on traditional press newspapers (?quality press?). Therefore, newspapers still maintain their influence and legitimising power.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estrategias y razones del impacto de WikiLeaks en la opinión pública mundial / Strategies and Reasons for the Impact of WikiLeaks on World Public Opinion\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Quian, C. Elías\",\"doi\":\"10.5477/CIS/REIS.162.91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolEsta investigacion intenta explicar cuando, como y por que emerge WikiLeaks como fenomeno global sistematizando sus estrategias mediaticas en tres claras etapas. Usamos herramientas de analitica web para recoger datos de cuatro niveles de popularidad digital: busquedas en Google, acceso al sitio web de WikiLeaks, presencia y seguidores en Twitter. Se analizan mas de 5 anos (desde su nacimiento en 2006 hasta la filtracion de Stratfor en 2012). Nuestros resultados indican que, en la era de la sociedad red, la popularidad de un fenomeno digital y antisistema como WikiLeaks (y el impacto de sus mensajes) depende, paradojicamente, de su difusion en la prensa tradicional de papel (quality press)que aun conserva su influencia y poder legitimador. EnglishThis study explains when, how and why WikiLeaks emerged as a global phenomenon. Its media strategies were clearly systematised into three stages. Web analytics tools were used to collect data from four different levels of digital popularity: Google searches for the term ?WikiLeaks?, ?WikiLeaks? website traffic, Twitter activity and Twitter followers. Data for more than five years were analysed (from December 2006, when WikiLeaks arose, to the Stratfor case, in 2012). Our results indicate that, in the age of the network society, the popularity of a digital and antiestablishment phenomenon such as WikiLeaks (and the impact of its messages) paradoxically depends on traditional press newspapers (?quality press?). Therefore, newspapers still maintain their influence and legitimising power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5477/CIS/REIS.162.91\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5477/CIS/REIS.162.91","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
这项研究试图通过将维基解密的媒体策略分为三个明确的阶段来解释维基解密何时、如何以及为什么成为一个全球现象。我们使用网络分析工具收集四个层次的数字人气数据:谷歌搜索、维基解密网站访问、Twitter上的存在和追随者。分析了5年多的时间(从2006年诞生到2012年Stratfor泄露)。我们的研究结果表明,在网络社会时代,像维基解密这样的反体制数字现象的流行(及其信息的影响)矛盾地依赖于它在传统纸质媒体(质量媒体)中的传播,而传统纸质媒体仍然保留着其影响力和合法性。这项研究解释了维基解密何时、如何以及为什么成为一种全球现象。其平均strategies确有一再systematised into三stages。网络分析工具被用来从四个不同程度的数字流行度收集数据:谷歌搜索术语?维基解密?,“维基解密”?= =地理= =根据美国人口普查局的数据,该县总面积为,其中土地和(1.)水。Data for more than五年被analysed(2006年12月时,维基解密arose, to the》个案,2012)。我们的研究结果表明,在网络社会时代,像维基解密这样的数字和反体制现象的普及程度(及其信息的影响)矛盾地依赖于传统报纸(?quality press ?)。因此,报纸仍然保持着影响力和合法性。
Estrategias y razones del impacto de WikiLeaks en la opinión pública mundial / Strategies and Reasons for the Impact of WikiLeaks on World Public Opinion
espanolEsta investigacion intenta explicar cuando, como y por que emerge WikiLeaks como fenomeno global sistematizando sus estrategias mediaticas en tres claras etapas. Usamos herramientas de analitica web para recoger datos de cuatro niveles de popularidad digital: busquedas en Google, acceso al sitio web de WikiLeaks, presencia y seguidores en Twitter. Se analizan mas de 5 anos (desde su nacimiento en 2006 hasta la filtracion de Stratfor en 2012). Nuestros resultados indican que, en la era de la sociedad red, la popularidad de un fenomeno digital y antisistema como WikiLeaks (y el impacto de sus mensajes) depende, paradojicamente, de su difusion en la prensa tradicional de papel (quality press)que aun conserva su influencia y poder legitimador. EnglishThis study explains when, how and why WikiLeaks emerged as a global phenomenon. Its media strategies were clearly systematised into three stages. Web analytics tools were used to collect data from four different levels of digital popularity: Google searches for the term ?WikiLeaks?, ?WikiLeaks? website traffic, Twitter activity and Twitter followers. Data for more than five years were analysed (from December 2006, when WikiLeaks arose, to the Stratfor case, in 2012). Our results indicate that, in the age of the network society, the popularity of a digital and antiestablishment phenomenon such as WikiLeaks (and the impact of its messages) paradoxically depends on traditional press newspapers (?quality press?). Therefore, newspapers still maintain their influence and legitimising power.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.