乔纳森·爱德华兹的情感人类学

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
K. Strobel
{"title":"乔纳森·爱德华兹的情感人类学","authors":"K. Strobel","doi":"10.1177/19397909231153114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jonathan Edwards (1703–1758) is often utilized in modern philosophical and psychological research as the theologian of affect. While affection is, undoubtedly, at the heart of his theological enterprise, one might mistakenly assume that affections are equivalent to our contemporary understanding of emotions. This article argues that this is a reduction of Edwards’s view, who advances a theological psychology rather than its secular counterpart. To address the question of what an emotion is within the context of Edwards’s theological psychology, this article addresses Edwards’s use of the term “emotion” alongside of his understanding of the affections and the passions within both an unregenerate and a regenerate frame. This focus is developed, not for its own sake, but to consider inquiries concerning the felt experience of the Christian life of affection, and questions concerning the formation of one’s experiential life.","PeriodicalId":36836,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care","volume":"9 1","pages":"31 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jonathan Edwards’s Affective Anthropology\",\"authors\":\"K. Strobel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19397909231153114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jonathan Edwards (1703–1758) is often utilized in modern philosophical and psychological research as the theologian of affect. While affection is, undoubtedly, at the heart of his theological enterprise, one might mistakenly assume that affections are equivalent to our contemporary understanding of emotions. This article argues that this is a reduction of Edwards’s view, who advances a theological psychology rather than its secular counterpart. To address the question of what an emotion is within the context of Edwards’s theological psychology, this article addresses Edwards’s use of the term “emotion” alongside of his understanding of the affections and the passions within both an unregenerate and a regenerate frame. This focus is developed, not for its own sake, but to consider inquiries concerning the felt experience of the Christian life of affection, and questions concerning the formation of one’s experiential life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"31 - 49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19397909231153114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19397909231153114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乔纳森·爱德华兹(1703-1758)在现代哲学和心理学研究中经常被用作情感神学家。虽然情感无疑是他神学事业的核心,但人们可能会错误地认为情感等同于我们当代对情感的理解。这篇文章认为这是爱德华兹观点的简化,他提出了神学心理学而不是世俗心理学。为了在爱德华兹的神学心理学背景下解决什么是情感的问题,本文讨论了爱德华兹对“情感”一词的使用,以及他对未重生和重生的框架内的情感和激情的理解。这个焦点的发展,不是为了它自己的缘故,而是为了考虑有关基督徒爱的生活的感受体验的问题,以及有关一个人的体验生活的形成的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jonathan Edwards’s Affective Anthropology
Jonathan Edwards (1703–1758) is often utilized in modern philosophical and psychological research as the theologian of affect. While affection is, undoubtedly, at the heart of his theological enterprise, one might mistakenly assume that affections are equivalent to our contemporary understanding of emotions. This article argues that this is a reduction of Edwards’s view, who advances a theological psychology rather than its secular counterpart. To address the question of what an emotion is within the context of Edwards’s theological psychology, this article addresses Edwards’s use of the term “emotion” alongside of his understanding of the affections and the passions within both an unregenerate and a regenerate frame. This focus is developed, not for its own sake, but to consider inquiries concerning the felt experience of the Christian life of affection, and questions concerning the formation of one’s experiential life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care
Journal of Spiritual Formation and Soul Care Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信