机器人直立训练器(鲁棒)和脊髓损伤个体的姿势控制。

Bulletin of concerned Asian scholars Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-09 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2022.2069532
Collin D Bowersock, Tanvi Pisolkar, Isirame Omofuma, Tatiana Luna, Moiz Khan, Victor Santamaria, Joel Stein, Sunil Agrawal, Susan J Harkema, Enrico Rejc
{"title":"机器人直立训练器(鲁棒)和脊髓损伤个体的姿势控制。","authors":"Collin D Bowersock, Tanvi Pisolkar, Isirame Omofuma, Tatiana Luna, Moiz Khan, Victor Santamaria, Joel Stein, Sunil Agrawal, Susan J Harkema, Enrico Rejc","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2022.2069532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>Assessed feasibility and potential effectiveness of using a novel robotic upright stand trainer (RobUST) to deliver postural perturbations or provide assistance-as-needed at the trunk while individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) performed stable standing and self-initiated trunk movements. These tasks were assessed with research participants' hands on handlebars for self-balance assistance (hands on) and with hands off (free hands).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Proof of concept study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Four individuals with motor complete (n = 3) or incomplete (n = 1) SCI who were not able to achieve independent standing and presented a neurological lesion level ranging from cervical 4 to thoracic 2.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Ground reaction forces, trunk displacement, and electromyography activity of trunk and lower limb muscles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Research participants received continuous pelvic assistance via RobUST, and manual trainer assistance at the knees to maintain standing. Participants were able to attempt all tasks. Free hands trunk perturbations resulted in greater load bearing-related sensory information (73% ipsilateral vertical loading), trunk displacement (57%), and muscle activation compared to hands on. Similarly, free hands stable standing with RobUST assistance-as-needed resulted in 8.5% larger bodyweight bearing, 112% larger trunk movement velocity, and higher trunk muscles activation compared to standing with hands on. Self-initiated trunk movements controlled by hands on showed 116% greater trunk displacement, 10% greater vertical ground reaction force, and greater ankle muscle activation compared to free hands.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RobUST established a safe and challenging standing environment for individuals with SCI and has the potential to improve training paradigms and assessments of standing postural control.</p>","PeriodicalId":84339,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of concerned Asian scholars","volume":"6 1","pages":"889-899"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10653750/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic upright stand trainer (RobUST) and postural control in individuals with spinal cord injury.\",\"authors\":\"Collin D Bowersock, Tanvi Pisolkar, Isirame Omofuma, Tatiana Luna, Moiz Khan, Victor Santamaria, Joel Stein, Sunil Agrawal, Susan J Harkema, Enrico Rejc\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2022.2069532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>Assessed feasibility and potential effectiveness of using a novel robotic upright stand trainer (RobUST) to deliver postural perturbations or provide assistance-as-needed at the trunk while individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) performed stable standing and self-initiated trunk movements. These tasks were assessed with research participants' hands on handlebars for self-balance assistance (hands on) and with hands off (free hands).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Proof of concept study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Four individuals with motor complete (n = 3) or incomplete (n = 1) SCI who were not able to achieve independent standing and presented a neurological lesion level ranging from cervical 4 to thoracic 2.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Ground reaction forces, trunk displacement, and electromyography activity of trunk and lower limb muscles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Research participants received continuous pelvic assistance via RobUST, and manual trainer assistance at the knees to maintain standing. Participants were able to attempt all tasks. Free hands trunk perturbations resulted in greater load bearing-related sensory information (73% ipsilateral vertical loading), trunk displacement (57%), and muscle activation compared to hands on. Similarly, free hands stable standing with RobUST assistance-as-needed resulted in 8.5% larger bodyweight bearing, 112% larger trunk movement velocity, and higher trunk muscles activation compared to standing with hands on. Self-initiated trunk movements controlled by hands on showed 116% greater trunk displacement, 10% greater vertical ground reaction force, and greater ankle muscle activation compared to free hands.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RobUST established a safe and challenging standing environment for individuals with SCI and has the potential to improve training paradigms and assessments of standing postural control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of concerned Asian scholars\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"889-899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10653750/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of concerned Asian scholars\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2022.2069532\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of concerned Asian scholars","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2022.2069532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景/目的:评估一种新型机器人直立训练器(RobUST)的可行性和潜在有效性,当脊髓损伤(SCI)患者进行稳定站立和自我发起的躯干运动时,它可以提供姿势扰动或根据需要在躯干处提供帮助。这些任务是通过研究参与者的手放在车把上(手在上)和不放在手上(空着手)来评估的。设计:概念验证研究。参与者:4例运动完全性(n = 3)或不完全性(n = 1)脊髓损伤患者,不能独立站立,神经损伤程度从颈椎4级到胸椎2级。结果测量:地面反作用力、躯干位移、躯干和下肢肌肉的肌电活动。结果:研究参与者通过鲁棒和手动训练器在膝盖处持续接受骨盆辅助以保持站立。参与者可以尝试所有的任务。与有手相比,无手躯干扰动导致更大的负重相关感觉信息(73%同侧垂直负荷)、躯干位移(57%)和肌肉激活。同样,与双手站立相比,自由双手稳定站立并根据需要提供强大的帮助,可以使体重承受能力提高8.5%,躯干运动速度提高112%,躯干肌肉激活率提高。双手控制的自我启动躯干运动显示,与自由双手相比,躯干位移增加116%,垂直地面反作用力增加10%,踝关节肌肉活动增加。结论:RobUST为脊髓损伤患者建立了一个安全且具有挑战性的站立环境,并有可能改善站立姿势控制的训练模式和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic upright stand trainer (RobUST) and postural control in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Context/objective: Assessed feasibility and potential effectiveness of using a novel robotic upright stand trainer (RobUST) to deliver postural perturbations or provide assistance-as-needed at the trunk while individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) performed stable standing and self-initiated trunk movements. These tasks were assessed with research participants' hands on handlebars for self-balance assistance (hands on) and with hands off (free hands).

Design: Proof of concept study.

Participants: Four individuals with motor complete (n = 3) or incomplete (n = 1) SCI who were not able to achieve independent standing and presented a neurological lesion level ranging from cervical 4 to thoracic 2.

Outcome measures: Ground reaction forces, trunk displacement, and electromyography activity of trunk and lower limb muscles.

Results: Research participants received continuous pelvic assistance via RobUST, and manual trainer assistance at the knees to maintain standing. Participants were able to attempt all tasks. Free hands trunk perturbations resulted in greater load bearing-related sensory information (73% ipsilateral vertical loading), trunk displacement (57%), and muscle activation compared to hands on. Similarly, free hands stable standing with RobUST assistance-as-needed resulted in 8.5% larger bodyweight bearing, 112% larger trunk movement velocity, and higher trunk muscles activation compared to standing with hands on. Self-initiated trunk movements controlled by hands on showed 116% greater trunk displacement, 10% greater vertical ground reaction force, and greater ankle muscle activation compared to free hands.

Conclusion: RobUST established a safe and challenging standing environment for individuals with SCI and has the potential to improve training paradigms and assessments of standing postural control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信