除了淫乱,还有别的原因……马太福音5:32a和犹太离婚法

Q4 Arts and Humanities
D. J. Steensma
{"title":"除了淫乱,还有别的原因……马太福音5:32a和犹太离婚法","authors":"D. J. Steensma","doi":"10.21827/tr.65.3.257-275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the Gospel of Matthew, 'Anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, causes her to become an adulteress' (5:32). This raises the question whether Jesus allows divorce only in the case of adultery. This article discusses Jesus' statement in the Matthean context and within the context of Jewish legislation in the first century, to show that Jesus is addressing a current debate about the interpretation of Deuteronomy 24:1, not the core of Jewish divorce law, namely, the possibility of marriage dissolution due to neglect of the marriage promise (Ex. 21:10-11). The latter provision was generally accepted in New Testament times, but is usually disregarded in the scholarly discussion of Matthew 5:32 (and 19:9).","PeriodicalId":36470,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Om een andere reden dan ontucht … . Mattheüs 5:32a en het joodse echtscheidingsrecht\",\"authors\":\"D. J. Steensma\",\"doi\":\"10.21827/tr.65.3.257-275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the Gospel of Matthew, 'Anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, causes her to become an adulteress' (5:32). This raises the question whether Jesus allows divorce only in the case of adultery. This article discusses Jesus' statement in the Matthean context and within the context of Jewish legislation in the first century, to show that Jesus is addressing a current debate about the interpretation of Deuteronomy 24:1, not the core of Jewish divorce law, namely, the possibility of marriage dissolution due to neglect of the marriage promise (Ex. 21:10-11). The latter provision was generally accepted in New Testament times, but is usually disregarded in the scholarly discussion of Matthew 5:32 (and 19:9).\",\"PeriodicalId\":36470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21827/tr.65.3.257-275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Theologia Reformata Transylvanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/tr.65.3.257-275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据马太福音,“凡休妻的,若不是为淫乱的缘故,就是叫她作淫妇了”(5:32)。这就提出了一个问题,耶稣是否只允许在通奸的情况下离婚。本文讨论了耶稣在马太福音和一世纪犹太法律背景下的陈述,以表明耶稣是在解决当前关于申命记24:1解释的争论,而不是犹太离婚法的核心,即由于忽视婚姻承诺而导致婚姻破裂的可能性(出21:10-11)。后一条款在新约时代被普遍接受,但在马太福音5:32(和19:9)的学术讨论中通常被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Om een andere reden dan ontucht … . Mattheüs 5:32a en het joodse echtscheidingsrecht
According to the Gospel of Matthew, 'Anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, causes her to become an adulteress' (5:32). This raises the question whether Jesus allows divorce only in the case of adultery. This article discusses Jesus' statement in the Matthean context and within the context of Jewish legislation in the first century, to show that Jesus is addressing a current debate about the interpretation of Deuteronomy 24:1, not the core of Jewish divorce law, namely, the possibility of marriage dissolution due to neglect of the marriage promise (Ex. 21:10-11). The latter provision was generally accepted in New Testament times, but is usually disregarded in the scholarly discussion of Matthew 5:32 (and 19:9).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信