{"title":"氯基光敏剂光动力疗法治疗基底细胞癌的疗效","authors":"T. Artsemyeva, D. Tzerkovsky","doi":"10.30683/1927-7229.2023.12.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to evaluate a safety and antitumor efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with chlorine-based photosensitizer (PS) for treatment patients with basal cell skin carcinomas (BCC). \nMaterial and Methods: The work was performed on the basis of the Department of hyperthermia and photodynamic therapy. The object of the study were 172 patients with a verified diagnosis of BCC (T1N0M0, I stage), who received treatment from 2007 to 2022. PS «Photolon» (RUE «Belmedpreparaty», Republic of Belarus) was administrated intravenously at a dose of 2.0-2.5 mg/kg. The session of PDT was performed 2.5-3 h after intravenous injection of PS using semiconductor lasers (λ=660±5 nm) with exposure doses 50-250 J/cm² and power density – 0.15-0.5 W/cm². Frequency and severity of side effects after treatment session was assessed based on the criteria CTCAE (Version 4.03; 2010). The antitumor efficacy was evaluated 3 months after treatment. Clinical outcome was evaluated visually and morphologically by cytological or histopathological examination. Performance criteria were as follows (according to WHO, 1979). \nResults: The phenomenon of skin phototoxicity due to violation of the light regime (hyperemia, burning, slight swelling of the soft tissues of the face; CTCAE, I-II grades) was registered in 5.8% of cases (n=10). Serious adverse reactions (anaphylactic shock, Quincke's edema, severe pain syndrome) after the administration of PS and photoirradiation were not identified. Complete and partial regressions of tumors was observed in 93.0% and 4.7% of patients, respectively. The objective answer was 97.7%. The frequency of local relapses of the disease 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after PDT was 3.1%, 3.1%, 4.6%, 4.6% and 6.9%, respectively. \nСonclusion: PDT is a well-tolerated and highly effective therapeutic option in patients with BCC.","PeriodicalId":14957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy with Chlorine-Based Photosensitizer in the Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinomas\",\"authors\":\"T. Artsemyeva, D. Tzerkovsky\",\"doi\":\"10.30683/1927-7229.2023.12.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study is to evaluate a safety and antitumor efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with chlorine-based photosensitizer (PS) for treatment patients with basal cell skin carcinomas (BCC). \\nMaterial and Methods: The work was performed on the basis of the Department of hyperthermia and photodynamic therapy. The object of the study were 172 patients with a verified diagnosis of BCC (T1N0M0, I stage), who received treatment from 2007 to 2022. PS «Photolon» (RUE «Belmedpreparaty», Republic of Belarus) was administrated intravenously at a dose of 2.0-2.5 mg/kg. The session of PDT was performed 2.5-3 h after intravenous injection of PS using semiconductor lasers (λ=660±5 nm) with exposure doses 50-250 J/cm² and power density – 0.15-0.5 W/cm². Frequency and severity of side effects after treatment session was assessed based on the criteria CTCAE (Version 4.03; 2010). The antitumor efficacy was evaluated 3 months after treatment. Clinical outcome was evaluated visually and morphologically by cytological or histopathological examination. Performance criteria were as follows (according to WHO, 1979). \\nResults: The phenomenon of skin phototoxicity due to violation of the light regime (hyperemia, burning, slight swelling of the soft tissues of the face; CTCAE, I-II grades) was registered in 5.8% of cases (n=10). Serious adverse reactions (anaphylactic shock, Quincke's edema, severe pain syndrome) after the administration of PS and photoirradiation were not identified. Complete and partial regressions of tumors was observed in 93.0% and 4.7% of patients, respectively. The objective answer was 97.7%. The frequency of local relapses of the disease 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after PDT was 3.1%, 3.1%, 4.6%, 4.6% and 6.9%, respectively. \\nСonclusion: PDT is a well-tolerated and highly effective therapeutic option in patients with BCC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Analytical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Analytical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30683/1927-7229.2023.12.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30683/1927-7229.2023.12.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy with Chlorine-Based Photosensitizer in the Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinomas
The aim of this study is to evaluate a safety and antitumor efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with chlorine-based photosensitizer (PS) for treatment patients with basal cell skin carcinomas (BCC).
Material and Methods: The work was performed on the basis of the Department of hyperthermia and photodynamic therapy. The object of the study were 172 patients with a verified diagnosis of BCC (T1N0M0, I stage), who received treatment from 2007 to 2022. PS «Photolon» (RUE «Belmedpreparaty», Republic of Belarus) was administrated intravenously at a dose of 2.0-2.5 mg/kg. The session of PDT was performed 2.5-3 h after intravenous injection of PS using semiconductor lasers (λ=660±5 nm) with exposure doses 50-250 J/cm² and power density – 0.15-0.5 W/cm². Frequency and severity of side effects after treatment session was assessed based on the criteria CTCAE (Version 4.03; 2010). The antitumor efficacy was evaluated 3 months after treatment. Clinical outcome was evaluated visually and morphologically by cytological or histopathological examination. Performance criteria were as follows (according to WHO, 1979).
Results: The phenomenon of skin phototoxicity due to violation of the light regime (hyperemia, burning, slight swelling of the soft tissues of the face; CTCAE, I-II grades) was registered in 5.8% of cases (n=10). Serious adverse reactions (anaphylactic shock, Quincke's edema, severe pain syndrome) after the administration of PS and photoirradiation were not identified. Complete and partial regressions of tumors was observed in 93.0% and 4.7% of patients, respectively. The objective answer was 97.7%. The frequency of local relapses of the disease 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after PDT was 3.1%, 3.1%, 4.6%, 4.6% and 6.9%, respectively.
Сonclusion: PDT is a well-tolerated and highly effective therapeutic option in patients with BCC.