Manpreet Singh, Manpreet Kaur, Z. Zadeng, M. Sharma, Aditi Mehta, P. Gupta
{"title":"泪小管插管与粘弹性辅助单小管支架置入术治疗泪小管阻塞的长期疗效","authors":"Manpreet Singh, Manpreet Kaur, Z. Zadeng, M. Sharma, Aditi Mehta, P. Gupta","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2022.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To study the long-term outcomes of lacrimal canalicular trephination (LCT) with viscoelastic-assisted monocanalicular stenting (VAMS) for the treatment of epiphora secondary to lacrimal canalicular obstructions (LCO). Methods: Our study was a retrospective interventional work. All patients diagnosed with LCO, having morbid epiphora (Munk’s scale ≥ 2), were included. The LCO was divided as proximal (< 6mm from punctum) and distal (≥ 6mm from punctum). Sisler’s lacrimal trephine (21 gauge) was used to recanalize the LCO with monocanalicular stent (0.64mm diameter) insertion, which was kept for a minimum of 6 weeks and a post-stent removal follow-up of 12 months was ensured. Fluorescein dye disappearance test and lacrimal irrigation were used as functional and anatomical tests for evaluation, respectively. Results: We included 73 eyes of 52 patients having a mean age of 44.5 years. Of the total, the proximal LCO was seen in 38 eyes (52.1%) and distal in 35 eyes (47.9%). The preoperative Munk’s score of 5 was noted in the majority (n=57 eyes, 78.1%). The majority (n=32 eyes, 43.8%) had chronic blepharitis or meibomian gland disease as etiology. Monocanalicular stent was kept in place for a mean of 13.5 weeks. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 months, complete response was noted in 35.6% cases, while 50.7% had partial and 13.7% had a failure of the procedure. Conclusions: LCT (without DCR) is a minimally invasive, simple, and effective technique for the treatment of LCO in the long term. VAMS is a helpful innovation to facilitate the insertion of the flexible silicone stent.","PeriodicalId":21385,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"72 1","pages":"41 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes of lacrimal canalicular trephination with viscoelastic-assisted monocanalicular stenting for canalicular obstructions\",\"authors\":\"Manpreet Singh, Manpreet Kaur, Z. Zadeng, M. Sharma, Aditi Mehta, P. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.22336/rjo.2022.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To study the long-term outcomes of lacrimal canalicular trephination (LCT) with viscoelastic-assisted monocanalicular stenting (VAMS) for the treatment of epiphora secondary to lacrimal canalicular obstructions (LCO). Methods: Our study was a retrospective interventional work. All patients diagnosed with LCO, having morbid epiphora (Munk’s scale ≥ 2), were included. The LCO was divided as proximal (< 6mm from punctum) and distal (≥ 6mm from punctum). Sisler’s lacrimal trephine (21 gauge) was used to recanalize the LCO with monocanalicular stent (0.64mm diameter) insertion, which was kept for a minimum of 6 weeks and a post-stent removal follow-up of 12 months was ensured. Fluorescein dye disappearance test and lacrimal irrigation were used as functional and anatomical tests for evaluation, respectively. Results: We included 73 eyes of 52 patients having a mean age of 44.5 years. Of the total, the proximal LCO was seen in 38 eyes (52.1%) and distal in 35 eyes (47.9%). The preoperative Munk’s score of 5 was noted in the majority (n=57 eyes, 78.1%). The majority (n=32 eyes, 43.8%) had chronic blepharitis or meibomian gland disease as etiology. Monocanalicular stent was kept in place for a mean of 13.5 weeks. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 months, complete response was noted in 35.6% cases, while 50.7% had partial and 13.7% had a failure of the procedure. Conclusions: LCT (without DCR) is a minimally invasive, simple, and effective technique for the treatment of LCO in the long term. VAMS is a helpful innovation to facilitate the insertion of the flexible silicone stent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2022.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2022.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term outcomes of lacrimal canalicular trephination with viscoelastic-assisted monocanalicular stenting for canalicular obstructions
Purpose: To study the long-term outcomes of lacrimal canalicular trephination (LCT) with viscoelastic-assisted monocanalicular stenting (VAMS) for the treatment of epiphora secondary to lacrimal canalicular obstructions (LCO). Methods: Our study was a retrospective interventional work. All patients diagnosed with LCO, having morbid epiphora (Munk’s scale ≥ 2), were included. The LCO was divided as proximal (< 6mm from punctum) and distal (≥ 6mm from punctum). Sisler’s lacrimal trephine (21 gauge) was used to recanalize the LCO with monocanalicular stent (0.64mm diameter) insertion, which was kept for a minimum of 6 weeks and a post-stent removal follow-up of 12 months was ensured. Fluorescein dye disappearance test and lacrimal irrigation were used as functional and anatomical tests for evaluation, respectively. Results: We included 73 eyes of 52 patients having a mean age of 44.5 years. Of the total, the proximal LCO was seen in 38 eyes (52.1%) and distal in 35 eyes (47.9%). The preoperative Munk’s score of 5 was noted in the majority (n=57 eyes, 78.1%). The majority (n=32 eyes, 43.8%) had chronic blepharitis or meibomian gland disease as etiology. Monocanalicular stent was kept in place for a mean of 13.5 weeks. At a mean follow-up of 14.5 months, complete response was noted in 35.6% cases, while 50.7% had partial and 13.7% had a failure of the procedure. Conclusions: LCT (without DCR) is a minimally invasive, simple, and effective technique for the treatment of LCO in the long term. VAMS is a helpful innovation to facilitate the insertion of the flexible silicone stent.