法医学的研究趋势:用科学计量学方法分析国际刑警组织审查的内容

IF 2.1 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Hervé Ménard, Oyewumi Akinpelu, Nana A. Fiakpui, Rong (Lily) He, Sarah Huxter, Caitlin Jordan, Lucy Judge, Aoife King, Brianna Miller, Sophie E. Moggs, Carmen‐Teodora Patrascu, Teri Pearson, M. E. J. Seneviratne, L. Timmerman, P. Haddrill, Joyce K. Klu, Christian Cole, N. Nic Daéid
{"title":"法医学的研究趋势:用科学计量学方法分析国际刑警组织审查的内容","authors":"Hervé Ménard, Oyewumi Akinpelu, Nana A. Fiakpui, Rong (Lily) He, Sarah Huxter, Caitlin Jordan, Lucy Judge, Aoife King, Brianna Miller, Sophie E. Moggs, Carmen‐Teodora Patrascu, Teri Pearson, M. E. J. Seneviratne, L. Timmerman, P. Haddrill, Joyce K. Klu, Christian Cole, N. Nic Daéid","doi":"10.1002/wfs2.1447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of forensic evidence has become indispensable in many countries and jurisdictions around the world; however, the dissemination of research advancements does not necessarily directly or easily reach the forensic science community. Reports from the INTERPOL International Forensic Science Managers Symposium outline major areas that are of interest to forensic practitioners across the INTERPOL member countries. The information contained in the INTERPOL reports is extensive but can be challenging to process. The purpose of this research is to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of trends within the INTERPOL reports over an 18 year period. References relating to 10 evidence types retrieved from the 14th to 19th INTERPOL IFSMS reports (2004 – 2019) were processed and compared with data exports from the citation database Scopus covering the same evidence types. The results from this work are summarized by investigating the relationships between the 10 evidence types. To explore the outputs a user-friendly R-Shiny application was developed and is freely available at: https://uod.ac.uk/lrcfsinterpolreportsexplorer. This article is categorized under:","PeriodicalId":75325,"journal":{"name":"WIREs. Forensic science","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research trends in forensic science: A scientometric approach to analyze the content of the\\n INTERPOL\\n reviews\",\"authors\":\"Hervé Ménard, Oyewumi Akinpelu, Nana A. Fiakpui, Rong (Lily) He, Sarah Huxter, Caitlin Jordan, Lucy Judge, Aoife King, Brianna Miller, Sophie E. Moggs, Carmen‐Teodora Patrascu, Teri Pearson, M. E. J. Seneviratne, L. Timmerman, P. Haddrill, Joyce K. Klu, Christian Cole, N. Nic Daéid\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wfs2.1447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of forensic evidence has become indispensable in many countries and jurisdictions around the world; however, the dissemination of research advancements does not necessarily directly or easily reach the forensic science community. Reports from the INTERPOL International Forensic Science Managers Symposium outline major areas that are of interest to forensic practitioners across the INTERPOL member countries. The information contained in the INTERPOL reports is extensive but can be challenging to process. The purpose of this research is to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of trends within the INTERPOL reports over an 18 year period. References relating to 10 evidence types retrieved from the 14th to 19th INTERPOL IFSMS reports (2004 – 2019) were processed and compared with data exports from the citation database Scopus covering the same evidence types. The results from this work are summarized by investigating the relationships between the 10 evidence types. To explore the outputs a user-friendly R-Shiny application was developed and is freely available at: https://uod.ac.uk/lrcfsinterpolreportsexplorer. This article is categorized under:\",\"PeriodicalId\":75325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIREs. Forensic science\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIREs. Forensic science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs. Forensic science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在世界上许多国家和司法管辖区,使用法医证据已成为必不可少的;然而,研究进展的传播并不一定直接或容易到达法医科学界。国际刑警组织国际法医学管理人员研讨会的报告概述了国际刑警组织成员国法医从业人员感兴趣的主要领域。国际刑警组织报告中所载信息广泛,但处理起来可能具有挑战性。这项研究的目的是全面概述国际刑警组织报告在18年期间的趋势演变。对从国际刑警组织IFSMS第14至19次报告(2004 - 2019)中检索到的10种证据类型的参考文献进行了处理,并与引用数据库Scopus导出的涵盖相同证据类型的数据进行了比较。通过研究10种证据类型之间的关系,总结了本工作的结果。为了探索输出,开发了一个用户友好的R-Shiny应用程序,并免费提供:https://uod.ac.uk/lrcfsinterpolreportsexplorer。本文分类如下:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research trends in forensic science: A scientometric approach to analyze the content of the INTERPOL reviews
The use of forensic evidence has become indispensable in many countries and jurisdictions around the world; however, the dissemination of research advancements does not necessarily directly or easily reach the forensic science community. Reports from the INTERPOL International Forensic Science Managers Symposium outline major areas that are of interest to forensic practitioners across the INTERPOL member countries. The information contained in the INTERPOL reports is extensive but can be challenging to process. The purpose of this research is to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of trends within the INTERPOL reports over an 18 year period. References relating to 10 evidence types retrieved from the 14th to 19th INTERPOL IFSMS reports (2004 – 2019) were processed and compared with data exports from the citation database Scopus covering the same evidence types. The results from this work are summarized by investigating the relationships between the 10 evidence types. To explore the outputs a user-friendly R-Shiny application was developed and is freely available at: https://uod.ac.uk/lrcfsinterpolreportsexplorer. This article is categorized under:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信