美国的国际粮食援助政策

E. Gabos
{"title":"美国的国际粮食援助政策","authors":"E. Gabos","doi":"10.15367/PJ.V6I1.353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States’ (US) current food aid foreign policies do not allow it to fulfill the primary goal of providing food aid to people in other countries who need it. The US’s current policies encourage dumping its agricultural surpluses into other countries’ markets in the form of food aid. Although this practice may further US economic pursuits, it undermines the goals of the US’ food aid programs by distorting markets and undermining producers in recipient countries. These countries then become dependent on US food aid, which further tilts the global market toward US agricultural products. US food aid foreign policy also exhibits structural issues, such as monetization and requirements that food aid be purchased from US farmers and shipped on US vessels. These practices waste money that the US could have spent on feeding more people. Drawing on government statistics, policy experts’ opinions, news reports, and recent examples of food aid policies’ effects, this brief delineates three policy options to more closely align US food aid foreign policy with its intended objectives. It will ultimately recommend that the US resolve its structural mismanagement issues impeding the efficacy of its food aid programs and divert funds away from development projects and toward disaster relief. ","PeriodicalId":39996,"journal":{"name":"Nanotechnology Perceptions","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The International Food Aid Policies of the United States\",\"authors\":\"E. Gabos\",\"doi\":\"10.15367/PJ.V6I1.353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The United States’ (US) current food aid foreign policies do not allow it to fulfill the primary goal of providing food aid to people in other countries who need it. The US’s current policies encourage dumping its agricultural surpluses into other countries’ markets in the form of food aid. Although this practice may further US economic pursuits, it undermines the goals of the US’ food aid programs by distorting markets and undermining producers in recipient countries. These countries then become dependent on US food aid, which further tilts the global market toward US agricultural products. US food aid foreign policy also exhibits structural issues, such as monetization and requirements that food aid be purchased from US farmers and shipped on US vessels. These practices waste money that the US could have spent on feeding more people. Drawing on government statistics, policy experts’ opinions, news reports, and recent examples of food aid policies’ effects, this brief delineates three policy options to more closely align US food aid foreign policy with its intended objectives. It will ultimately recommend that the US resolve its structural mismanagement issues impeding the efficacy of its food aid programs and divert funds away from development projects and toward disaster relief. \",\"PeriodicalId\":39996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nanotechnology Perceptions\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nanotechnology Perceptions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15367/PJ.V6I1.353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanotechnology Perceptions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15367/PJ.V6I1.353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国目前的粮食援助外交政策不允许它实现向其他国家有需要的人民提供粮食援助的主要目标。美国目前的政策鼓励以粮食援助的形式向其他国家的市场倾销其农业盈余。尽管这种做法可能会促进美国的经济追求,但它扭曲了市场,损害了受援国的生产者,从而破坏了美国粮食援助计划的目标。然后,这些国家变得依赖美国的粮食援助,这进一步使全球市场向美国农产品倾斜。美国的粮食援助外交政策也显示出结构性问题,比如货币化,以及要求从美国农民手中购买粮食并由美国船只运输。这些做法浪费了美国本可以用来养活更多人的钱。根据政府统计数据、政策专家的意见、新闻报道和最近粮食援助政策效果的例子,本文概述了三种政策选择,以使美国的粮食援助外交政策与其预期目标更紧密地结合起来。它最终将建议美国解决阻碍其粮食援助项目有效性的结构性管理不善问题,并将资金从发展项目中转移到救灾中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The International Food Aid Policies of the United States
The United States’ (US) current food aid foreign policies do not allow it to fulfill the primary goal of providing food aid to people in other countries who need it. The US’s current policies encourage dumping its agricultural surpluses into other countries’ markets in the form of food aid. Although this practice may further US economic pursuits, it undermines the goals of the US’ food aid programs by distorting markets and undermining producers in recipient countries. These countries then become dependent on US food aid, which further tilts the global market toward US agricultural products. US food aid foreign policy also exhibits structural issues, such as monetization and requirements that food aid be purchased from US farmers and shipped on US vessels. These practices waste money that the US could have spent on feeding more people. Drawing on government statistics, policy experts’ opinions, news reports, and recent examples of food aid policies’ effects, this brief delineates three policy options to more closely align US food aid foreign policy with its intended objectives. It will ultimately recommend that the US resolve its structural mismanagement issues impeding the efficacy of its food aid programs and divert funds away from development projects and toward disaster relief. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nanotechnology Perceptions
Nanotechnology Perceptions Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信