{"title":"通过辅助生殖技术受孕:围产期预后不良的独立危险因素","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/jgrm.04.02.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) are well established treatments offered in the sub-fertile couple. As a\nconsequence, obstetricians increasingly have to manage high risk pregnancies without any formal guidelines to\nfollow. We carried out a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the risks of ART using data from 11875 women (11326\nspontaneously conceived pregnancies and 549 using ART) in order to propose a policy to better manage them\nantenatally. Outcome measures included induction of labour, method of and gestation at delivery, gestational diabetes\nmellitus, and small for gestational age, anal sphincter injury, post-partum haemorrhage and neonatal morbidity and\nmortality. The ART group had higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (18.9% vs 9.4%, P <0.0001), small for\ngestational age (9.1% vs 5.6%, P=0.001), instrumental delivery (19.6 vs 11.8%, P<0.0001), emergency caesarean\nsection (26.8% vs 15%, P<0.0001) and post-partum haemorrhage >1500mL (6.9% vs 3%, P<0.0001). Lower\nApgar scores (2.6% vs 1.4%, P=0.03) and admission to neonatal unit were more likely in the ART group (10.2% vs\n5.4%, P<0.0001). Our results suggest that antenatal monitoring for gestational diabetes mellitus and fetal growth,\nappropriate counselling regarding mode and timing of delivery and active management of 3rd stage of labour, are\nessential when managing high risk ART pregnancies.","PeriodicalId":93778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conception via Assisted Reproductive Techniques: an Independent Risk Factor for\\nPoor Perinatal Outcome\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/jgrm.04.02.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) are well established treatments offered in the sub-fertile couple. As a\\nconsequence, obstetricians increasingly have to manage high risk pregnancies without any formal guidelines to\\nfollow. We carried out a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the risks of ART using data from 11875 women (11326\\nspontaneously conceived pregnancies and 549 using ART) in order to propose a policy to better manage them\\nantenatally. Outcome measures included induction of labour, method of and gestation at delivery, gestational diabetes\\nmellitus, and small for gestational age, anal sphincter injury, post-partum haemorrhage and neonatal morbidity and\\nmortality. The ART group had higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (18.9% vs 9.4%, P <0.0001), small for\\ngestational age (9.1% vs 5.6%, P=0.001), instrumental delivery (19.6 vs 11.8%, P<0.0001), emergency caesarean\\nsection (26.8% vs 15%, P<0.0001) and post-partum haemorrhage >1500mL (6.9% vs 3%, P<0.0001). Lower\\nApgar scores (2.6% vs 1.4%, P=0.03) and admission to neonatal unit were more likely in the ART group (10.2% vs\\n5.4%, P<0.0001). Our results suggest that antenatal monitoring for gestational diabetes mellitus and fetal growth,\\nappropriate counselling regarding mode and timing of delivery and active management of 3rd stage of labour, are\\nessential when managing high risk ART pregnancies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/jgrm.04.02.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology, clinical obstetrics and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/jgrm.04.02.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
辅助生殖技术(ART)是为低生育能力夫妇提供的成熟的治疗方法。因此,越来越多的产科医生不得不在没有任何正式指导的情况下管理高危妊娠。我们开展了一项回顾性队列研究,利用11875名妇女(11326名自然怀孕,549名使用ART)的数据来评估ART的风险,以便提出更好地管理这些风险的政策。结局指标包括引产、分娩方式和妊娠、妊娠期糖尿病和胎龄小、肛门括约肌损伤、产后出血和新生儿发病率和死亡率。ART组妊娠期糖尿病发生率较高(18.9% vs 9.4%, P 1500mL) (6.9% vs 3%, P<0.0001)。ART组apgar评分较低(2.6% vs 1.4%, P=0.03)和进新生儿病房的可能性更大(10.2% vs5.4%, P<0.0001)。我们的研究结果表明,在管理高危ART妊娠时,产前监测妊娠糖尿病和胎儿生长,适当的分娩方式和时间咨询以及积极管理第三阶段分娩是必不可少的。
Conception via Assisted Reproductive Techniques: an Independent Risk Factor for
Poor Perinatal Outcome
Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) are well established treatments offered in the sub-fertile couple. As a
consequence, obstetricians increasingly have to manage high risk pregnancies without any formal guidelines to
follow. We carried out a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the risks of ART using data from 11875 women (11326
spontaneously conceived pregnancies and 549 using ART) in order to propose a policy to better manage them
antenatally. Outcome measures included induction of labour, method of and gestation at delivery, gestational diabetes
mellitus, and small for gestational age, anal sphincter injury, post-partum haemorrhage and neonatal morbidity and
mortality. The ART group had higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (18.9% vs 9.4%, P <0.0001), small for
gestational age (9.1% vs 5.6%, P=0.001), instrumental delivery (19.6 vs 11.8%, P<0.0001), emergency caesarean
section (26.8% vs 15%, P<0.0001) and post-partum haemorrhage >1500mL (6.9% vs 3%, P<0.0001). Lower
Apgar scores (2.6% vs 1.4%, P=0.03) and admission to neonatal unit were more likely in the ART group (10.2% vs
5.4%, P<0.0001). Our results suggest that antenatal monitoring for gestational diabetes mellitus and fetal growth,
appropriate counselling regarding mode and timing of delivery and active management of 3rd stage of labour, are
essential when managing high risk ART pregnancies.