{"title":"CrowWhale-energy - trust - aware组播路由算法性能评价与比较分析","authors":"Dipali K. Shende, Y. Angal","doi":"10.3233/web-220063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multipath routing helps to establish various quality of service parameters, which is significant in helping multimedia broadcasting in the Internet of Things (IoT). Traditional multicast routing in IoT mainly concentrates on ad hoc sensor networking environments, which are not approachable and vigorous enough for assisting multimedia applications in an IoT environment. For resolving the challenging issues of multicast routing in IoT, CrowWhale-energy and trust-aware multicast routing (CrowWhale-ETR) have been devised. In this research, the routing performance of CrowWhale-ETR is analyzed by comparing it with optimization-based routing, routing protocols, and objective functions. Here, the optimization-based algorithm, namely the Spider Monkey Optimization algorithm (SMO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Dolphin Echolocation Optimization (DEO) algorithm, Water Wave Optimization (WWO) algorithm, Crow Search Algorithm (CSA), and, routing protocols, like Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), CTrust-RPL, Energy-Harvesting-Aware Routing Algorithm (EHARA), light-weight trust-based Quality of Service (QoS) routing, and Energy-awareness Load Balancing-Faster Local Repair (ELB-FLR) and the objective functions, such as energy, distance, delay, trust, link lifetime (LLT) and EDDTL (all objectives) are utilized for comparing the performance of CrowWhale-ETR. In addition, the performance of CrowWhale-ETR is analyzed in terms of delay, detection rate, energy, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and throughput, and it achieved better values of 0.539 s, 0.628, 78.42%, 0.871, and 0.759 using EDDTL as fitness.","PeriodicalId":42775,"journal":{"name":"Web Intelligence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance evaluation and comparative analysis of CrowWhale-energy and trust aware multicast routing algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Dipali K. Shende, Y. Angal\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/web-220063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multipath routing helps to establish various quality of service parameters, which is significant in helping multimedia broadcasting in the Internet of Things (IoT). Traditional multicast routing in IoT mainly concentrates on ad hoc sensor networking environments, which are not approachable and vigorous enough for assisting multimedia applications in an IoT environment. For resolving the challenging issues of multicast routing in IoT, CrowWhale-energy and trust-aware multicast routing (CrowWhale-ETR) have been devised. In this research, the routing performance of CrowWhale-ETR is analyzed by comparing it with optimization-based routing, routing protocols, and objective functions. Here, the optimization-based algorithm, namely the Spider Monkey Optimization algorithm (SMO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Dolphin Echolocation Optimization (DEO) algorithm, Water Wave Optimization (WWO) algorithm, Crow Search Algorithm (CSA), and, routing protocols, like Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), CTrust-RPL, Energy-Harvesting-Aware Routing Algorithm (EHARA), light-weight trust-based Quality of Service (QoS) routing, and Energy-awareness Load Balancing-Faster Local Repair (ELB-FLR) and the objective functions, such as energy, distance, delay, trust, link lifetime (LLT) and EDDTL (all objectives) are utilized for comparing the performance of CrowWhale-ETR. In addition, the performance of CrowWhale-ETR is analyzed in terms of delay, detection rate, energy, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and throughput, and it achieved better values of 0.539 s, 0.628, 78.42%, 0.871, and 0.759 using EDDTL as fitness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Web Intelligence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Web Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/web-220063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Web Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/web-220063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance evaluation and comparative analysis of CrowWhale-energy and trust aware multicast routing algorithm
Multipath routing helps to establish various quality of service parameters, which is significant in helping multimedia broadcasting in the Internet of Things (IoT). Traditional multicast routing in IoT mainly concentrates on ad hoc sensor networking environments, which are not approachable and vigorous enough for assisting multimedia applications in an IoT environment. For resolving the challenging issues of multicast routing in IoT, CrowWhale-energy and trust-aware multicast routing (CrowWhale-ETR) have been devised. In this research, the routing performance of CrowWhale-ETR is analyzed by comparing it with optimization-based routing, routing protocols, and objective functions. Here, the optimization-based algorithm, namely the Spider Monkey Optimization algorithm (SMO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Dolphin Echolocation Optimization (DEO) algorithm, Water Wave Optimization (WWO) algorithm, Crow Search Algorithm (CSA), and, routing protocols, like Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), CTrust-RPL, Energy-Harvesting-Aware Routing Algorithm (EHARA), light-weight trust-based Quality of Service (QoS) routing, and Energy-awareness Load Balancing-Faster Local Repair (ELB-FLR) and the objective functions, such as energy, distance, delay, trust, link lifetime (LLT) and EDDTL (all objectives) are utilized for comparing the performance of CrowWhale-ETR. In addition, the performance of CrowWhale-ETR is analyzed in terms of delay, detection rate, energy, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and throughput, and it achieved better values of 0.539 s, 0.628, 78.42%, 0.871, and 0.759 using EDDTL as fitness.
期刊介绍:
Web Intelligence (WI) is an official journal of the Web Intelligence Consortium (WIC), an international organization dedicated to promoting collaborative scientific research and industrial development in the era of Web intelligence. WI seeks to collaborate with major societies and international conferences in the field. WI is a peer-reviewed journal, which publishes four issues a year, in both online and print form. WI aims to achieve a multi-disciplinary balance between research advances in theories and methods usually associated with Collective Intelligence, Data Science, Human-Centric Computing, Knowledge Management, and Network Science. It is committed to publishing research that both deepen the understanding of computational, logical, cognitive, physical, and social foundations of the future Web, and enable the development and application of technologies based on Web intelligence. The journal features high-quality, original research papers (including state-of-the-art reviews), brief papers, and letters in all theoretical and technology areas that make up the field of WI. The papers should clearly focus on some of the following areas of interest: a. Collective Intelligence[...] b. Data Science[...] c. Human-Centric Computing[...] d. Knowledge Management[...] e. Network Science[...]