埃及某医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对莫匹罗星的耐药性检测

S. Taha, N. Kamel, L. Metwally
{"title":"埃及某医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对莫匹罗星的耐药性检测","authors":"S. Taha, N. Kamel, L. Metwally","doi":"10.21608/ejmm.2022.247201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be eradicated by topical mupirocin application. Mupirocin resistance, on the other hand, is becoming more widespread. Objective: The present work aims to compare conventional and molecular approaches to detect the prevalence of mupirocin resistance in MRSA isolates from clinical and nasal samples, as well as to investigate their susceptibility to other antibiotics. Methodology: Our study included 60 MRSA non-duplicate isolates, 14 from surgical wounds, 16 from urinary tract infections from patients hospitalized to Suez- Canal University Hospital in Ismailia, Egypt, and 30 nasal swabs from health care workers. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for MRSA isolates to mupirocin were determined using the E-test method, and PCR targeting the mupA gene was performed. Results: Six isolates out of 60 MRSA isolates (10%) showed high-level mupirocin resistance, while just one strain (1.6%) showed low-level mupirocin resistance. Four of the six MRSA isolates with high levels of mupirocin resistance carried the mupA gene. All seven mupirocin-resistant isolates (11.6%) were isolated from nasal swabs. MRSA strains resistant to mupirocin were more resistant to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole than mupirocin-susceptible ones. Conclusion: The high prevalence of mupirocin resistance in MRSA strains at our hospital is alarming. As a result, frequent testing of MRSA for mupirocin resistance is recommended even in settings where mupirocin is not used prophylactically.","PeriodicalId":22549,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of Mupirocin Resistance in Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in an Egyptian Hospital\",\"authors\":\"S. Taha, N. Kamel, L. Metwally\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ejmm.2022.247201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be eradicated by topical mupirocin application. Mupirocin resistance, on the other hand, is becoming more widespread. Objective: The present work aims to compare conventional and molecular approaches to detect the prevalence of mupirocin resistance in MRSA isolates from clinical and nasal samples, as well as to investigate their susceptibility to other antibiotics. Methodology: Our study included 60 MRSA non-duplicate isolates, 14 from surgical wounds, 16 from urinary tract infections from patients hospitalized to Suez- Canal University Hospital in Ismailia, Egypt, and 30 nasal swabs from health care workers. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for MRSA isolates to mupirocin were determined using the E-test method, and PCR targeting the mupA gene was performed. Results: Six isolates out of 60 MRSA isolates (10%) showed high-level mupirocin resistance, while just one strain (1.6%) showed low-level mupirocin resistance. Four of the six MRSA isolates with high levels of mupirocin resistance carried the mupA gene. All seven mupirocin-resistant isolates (11.6%) were isolated from nasal swabs. MRSA strains resistant to mupirocin were more resistant to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole than mupirocin-susceptible ones. Conclusion: The high prevalence of mupirocin resistance in MRSA strains at our hospital is alarming. As a result, frequent testing of MRSA for mupirocin resistance is recommended even in settings where mupirocin is not used prophylactically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmm.2022.247201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmm.2022.247201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的鼻腔携带可以通过局部应用莫匹罗星根除。另一方面,对莫匹罗星的耐药性正变得越来越普遍。目的:比较常规方法和分子方法检测MRSA临床和鼻腔样本中莫匹罗星耐药性的流行情况,并调查其对其他抗生素的敏感性。方法:我们的研究包括60株MRSA非重复分离株,14株来自外科伤口,16株来自埃及伊斯梅利亚苏伊士运河大学医院住院患者的尿路感染,30株来自卫生保健工作者的鼻拭子。采用E-test法测定MRSA分离株对mup罗星的最低抑菌浓度(mic),并对mupA基因进行PCR检测。结果:60株MRSA中有6株(10%)表现出高水平的莫匹罗星耐药,仅有1株(1.6%)表现出低水平的莫匹罗星耐药。6株对莫匹罗星具有高水平耐药性的MRSA分离株中有4株携带mupA基因。所有7株莫匹罗星耐药菌株(11.6%)均从鼻拭子中分离出来。对莫匹罗星耐药的MRSA菌株对四环素、氯霉素、庆大霉素、环丙沙星和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑的耐药程度高于莫匹罗星敏感菌株。结论:我院MRSA菌株对莫匹罗星的高耐药率令人担忧。因此,即使在没有预防性使用莫匹罗星的情况下,也建议经常检测MRSA对莫匹罗星的耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of Mupirocin Resistance in Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in an Egyptian Hospital
Background: Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) can be eradicated by topical mupirocin application. Mupirocin resistance, on the other hand, is becoming more widespread. Objective: The present work aims to compare conventional and molecular approaches to detect the prevalence of mupirocin resistance in MRSA isolates from clinical and nasal samples, as well as to investigate their susceptibility to other antibiotics. Methodology: Our study included 60 MRSA non-duplicate isolates, 14 from surgical wounds, 16 from urinary tract infections from patients hospitalized to Suez- Canal University Hospital in Ismailia, Egypt, and 30 nasal swabs from health care workers. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for MRSA isolates to mupirocin were determined using the E-test method, and PCR targeting the mupA gene was performed. Results: Six isolates out of 60 MRSA isolates (10%) showed high-level mupirocin resistance, while just one strain (1.6%) showed low-level mupirocin resistance. Four of the six MRSA isolates with high levels of mupirocin resistance carried the mupA gene. All seven mupirocin-resistant isolates (11.6%) were isolated from nasal swabs. MRSA strains resistant to mupirocin were more resistant to tetracycline, chloramphenicol, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole than mupirocin-susceptible ones. Conclusion: The high prevalence of mupirocin resistance in MRSA strains at our hospital is alarming. As a result, frequent testing of MRSA for mupirocin resistance is recommended even in settings where mupirocin is not used prophylactically.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信