回归hoeffding算法中的特征排序

J. Duarte, João Gama
{"title":"回归hoeffding算法中的特征排序","authors":"J. Duarte, João Gama","doi":"10.1145/3019612.3019670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feature selection and feature ranking are two aspects of the same learning task. They are well studied in batch scenarios, but not in the streaming setting. This paper presents a study on feature ranking from data streams in online learning regression models. The main challenge here is the relevance of features might change over time: features relevant in the past might be irrelevant now and vice-versa. We propose three new online feature ranking algorithms designed for Hoeffding algorithms. We have implemented the three methods in AMRules, a streaming regression algorithm to learn model rules. We compare their behaviour experimentally and present the pros and cons of each method.","PeriodicalId":20728,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feature ranking in hoeffding algorithms for regression\",\"authors\":\"J. Duarte, João Gama\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3019612.3019670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feature selection and feature ranking are two aspects of the same learning task. They are well studied in batch scenarios, but not in the streaming setting. This paper presents a study on feature ranking from data streams in online learning regression models. The main challenge here is the relevance of features might change over time: features relevant in the past might be irrelevant now and vice-versa. We propose three new online feature ranking algorithms designed for Hoeffding algorithms. We have implemented the three methods in AMRules, a streaming regression algorithm to learn model rules. We compare their behaviour experimentally and present the pros and cons of each method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3019612.3019670\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3019612.3019670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

特征选择和特征排序是同一学习任务的两个方面。它们在批处理场景中得到了很好的研究,但在流设置中没有得到很好的研究。本文研究了在线学习回归模型中数据流的特征排序问题。这里的主要挑战是功能的相关性可能会随着时间的推移而改变:过去相关的功能现在可能不相关,反之亦然。针对Hoeffding算法,提出了三种新的在线特征排序算法。我们已经在流回归算法AMRules中实现了这三种方法来学习模型规则。我们通过实验比较了它们的行为,并介绍了每种方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feature ranking in hoeffding algorithms for regression
Feature selection and feature ranking are two aspects of the same learning task. They are well studied in batch scenarios, but not in the streaming setting. This paper presents a study on feature ranking from data streams in online learning regression models. The main challenge here is the relevance of features might change over time: features relevant in the past might be irrelevant now and vice-versa. We propose three new online feature ranking algorithms designed for Hoeffding algorithms. We have implemented the three methods in AMRules, a streaming regression algorithm to learn model rules. We compare their behaviour experimentally and present the pros and cons of each method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信