提供者和消费者行为及其相互作用测量以人为本的护理。

Samantha M. Hack, A. Muralidharan, Clayton H. Brown, A. Lucksted, J. Patterson
{"title":"提供者和消费者行为及其相互作用测量以人为本的护理。","authors":"Samantha M. Hack, A. Muralidharan, Clayton H. Brown, A. Lucksted, J. Patterson","doi":"10.5750/IJPCM.V7I1.602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nCurrent research has found that higher rates of person-centered care (PCC) are associated with greater treatment adherence and positive treatment outcomes. However, the instruments used to access PCC primarily collect data on provider behavior, rather than consumer participation in PCC, despite the necessary co-equal and collaborative nature of PCC interactions.\n\n\nObjectives\nThe objective of the current study was to test the hypotheses that: (1) the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS) consumer information subscale and the consumer decision making subscale are not correlated with the PPPC subscales and, (2) consumer perceptions of person-centeredness and of consumer involvement in care are significant independent explanatory variables for the theoretically or quantitatively grounded outcomes of therapeutic alliance, treatment adherence, and mental health care system mistrust.\n\n\nMethods\nCross-sectional survey data was collected from 82 mental health care consumers receiving services at two Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. Participants completed surveys on perceptions of PCC, consumer involvement in care, therapeutic alliance, medication adherence, and mental health care system mistrust.\n\n\nResults\nSignificant correlation between the consumer participation and PCC subscales was mixed. Higher levels of PCC were associated with greater therapeutic alliance, less suspicion of mental health care systems, less perception of lack of support from providers, and less beliefs about group disparities in care. Consumer involvement was only significantly related to suspicion of mental health care systems.\n\n\nDiscussion and Conclusions\nThese findings may be a function of the locus of each outcome variable. When conducting PCC research investigators should consider how the outcomes they are examining inform the method through which they measure patient-centeredness.","PeriodicalId":89680,"journal":{"name":"International journal of person centered medicine","volume":"39 1","pages":"14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provider and Consumer Behaviors and their Interaction for Measuring Person-Centered Care.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha M. Hack, A. Muralidharan, Clayton H. Brown, A. Lucksted, J. Patterson\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/IJPCM.V7I1.602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nCurrent research has found that higher rates of person-centered care (PCC) are associated with greater treatment adherence and positive treatment outcomes. However, the instruments used to access PCC primarily collect data on provider behavior, rather than consumer participation in PCC, despite the necessary co-equal and collaborative nature of PCC interactions.\\n\\n\\nObjectives\\nThe objective of the current study was to test the hypotheses that: (1) the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS) consumer information subscale and the consumer decision making subscale are not correlated with the PPPC subscales and, (2) consumer perceptions of person-centeredness and of consumer involvement in care are significant independent explanatory variables for the theoretically or quantitatively grounded outcomes of therapeutic alliance, treatment adherence, and mental health care system mistrust.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nCross-sectional survey data was collected from 82 mental health care consumers receiving services at two Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. Participants completed surveys on perceptions of PCC, consumer involvement in care, therapeutic alliance, medication adherence, and mental health care system mistrust.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nSignificant correlation between the consumer participation and PCC subscales was mixed. Higher levels of PCC were associated with greater therapeutic alliance, less suspicion of mental health care systems, less perception of lack of support from providers, and less beliefs about group disparities in care. Consumer involvement was only significantly related to suspicion of mental health care systems.\\n\\n\\nDiscussion and Conclusions\\nThese findings may be a function of the locus of each outcome variable. When conducting PCC research investigators should consider how the outcomes they are examining inform the method through which they measure patient-centeredness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of person centered medicine\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"14-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of person centered medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/IJPCM.V7I1.602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of person centered medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/IJPCM.V7I1.602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前的研究发现,更高的以人为本的护理(PCC)率与更高的治疗依从性和积极的治疗结果相关。然而,用于访问PCC的工具主要收集有关提供者行为的数据,而不是消费者参与PCC的数据,尽管PCC互动具有必要的共同平等和协作性质。本研究的目的是检验以下假设:(1)护理介入量表(PICS)消费者信息子量表和消费者决策子量表与PPPC子量表不相关;(2)消费者以人为中心的感知和护理介入是治疗联盟、治疗依从性和心理卫生保健系统不信任的理论或定量基础结果的显著独立解释变量。方法对82名在两家退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)接受服务的心理保健消费者进行横断面调查。参与者完成了对PCC、消费者参与护理、治疗联盟、药物依从性和精神卫生保健系统不信任的看法的调查。结果消费者参与与PCC各分量表之间存在不显著的相关关系。较高的PCC水平与更大的治疗联盟、更少的对精神卫生保健系统的怀疑、更少的对提供者缺乏支持的感知以及更少的对护理群体差异的信念相关。消费者参与仅与怀疑精神卫生保健系统显著相关。讨论和结论这些发现可能是每个结果变量所在地的函数。在进行PCC研究时,研究者应该考虑他们所检查的结果如何为他们测量以患者为中心的方法提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provider and Consumer Behaviors and their Interaction for Measuring Person-Centered Care.
Background Current research has found that higher rates of person-centered care (PCC) are associated with greater treatment adherence and positive treatment outcomes. However, the instruments used to access PCC primarily collect data on provider behavior, rather than consumer participation in PCC, despite the necessary co-equal and collaborative nature of PCC interactions. Objectives The objective of the current study was to test the hypotheses that: (1) the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS) consumer information subscale and the consumer decision making subscale are not correlated with the PPPC subscales and, (2) consumer perceptions of person-centeredness and of consumer involvement in care are significant independent explanatory variables for the theoretically or quantitatively grounded outcomes of therapeutic alliance, treatment adherence, and mental health care system mistrust. Methods Cross-sectional survey data was collected from 82 mental health care consumers receiving services at two Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. Participants completed surveys on perceptions of PCC, consumer involvement in care, therapeutic alliance, medication adherence, and mental health care system mistrust. Results Significant correlation between the consumer participation and PCC subscales was mixed. Higher levels of PCC were associated with greater therapeutic alliance, less suspicion of mental health care systems, less perception of lack of support from providers, and less beliefs about group disparities in care. Consumer involvement was only significantly related to suspicion of mental health care systems. Discussion and Conclusions These findings may be a function of the locus of each outcome variable. When conducting PCC research investigators should consider how the outcomes they are examining inform the method through which they measure patient-centeredness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信