CORR Insights®:主席与主席:骨科是否比其他专业更多地使用性别术语?

A. Abdeen
{"title":"CORR Insights®:主席与主席:骨科是否比其他专业更多地使用性别术语?","authors":"A. Abdeen","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000001026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here’s a riddle many of us have heard: A father and his son are in a car crash. The father is killed. The son is taken to the hospital. Just as he’s rushed to the operating room the surgeon says: “I can’t operate. That boy is my son!” How can this be? The fact that it is not immediately evident to most of us that the surgeon is the boy’s mother, underscores the enduring impact of gendered occupational terms. Surgeon is one of many genderspecific job titles (like pilot, firefighter, foreman, nurse, and midwife) that conjures up a specific gender stereotype. If the gender of an individual is not typically associated with a given profession, we use statements of exemption such as “female-surgeon” or “male-nurse”, implying an outlier, or inferior member of that profession. I’m using the terms “female-surgeon” and “male-nurse” here because they are the common parlance for those particular professions, even though language of gender would be more appropriate in light of the fact that we’re discussing social roles here, rather than anything to do with biology (that is woman and man, rather than female and male, would be the preferred words) [5]. The gendered nature of occupations is pervasive, particularly in leadership positions in academic medicine where the title “chairman” is germane. The suffix “-man” comes from the Old English word for “person”, which in present-day English has become predominantly masculine [4]. The term “chairman” is under scrutiny as a possible source of gender bias in the current article by Peck and colleagues [10]. Exclusionary language hinders diversity in the workforce and perpetuates gender disparity [6]. This paper found that the gendered term “chairman” is used more frequently in orthopaedics than in many other medical specialties. It is well established that gender diversity in medicine benefits our patients and the organizations in which we work. According to a 2018 report from the Association of American Medical Colleges, “when health care providers have life experience that more closely matches the experience of their patients, patients tend to be more satisfied with their care and to adhere to medical advice. This effect has been seen in studies ... when the demographics of health care providers reflect those of underserved populations” [7]. Furthermore, diverse organizations are more successful—companies in the top quartile for gender diversity are 15% more likely to have returns above the industry mean [12]. Although historically a field dominated bymen, women are now entering medicine in increasing numbers. Since the 1972 enactment of Title IX, the number of women enrolled in US medical schools has drastically increased from 10% in 1970 to more than 50% today [2]. The greatest number of women in medicine are in internal medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology. In some specialties the percentage of women exceeds that of men such as in pediatrics and This CORR Insights is a commentary on the article “Chair Versus Chairman: Does orthopaedics Use the Gendered Term More Than Other Specialties?” by Peck and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1097/CORR. 0000000000000964. The author certifies that neither she, nor any members of her immediate family, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. A. Abdeen MD, FRCSC (✉), Harvard Medical School, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Stoneman 10, Boston, MA 02494 USA, Email: aabdeen@ bidmc.harvard.edu","PeriodicalId":10465,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CORR Insights®: Chair Versus Chairman: Does Orthopaedics Use the Gendered Term More Than Other Specialties?\",\"authors\":\"A. Abdeen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CORR.0000000000001026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Here’s a riddle many of us have heard: A father and his son are in a car crash. The father is killed. The son is taken to the hospital. Just as he’s rushed to the operating room the surgeon says: “I can’t operate. That boy is my son!” How can this be? The fact that it is not immediately evident to most of us that the surgeon is the boy’s mother, underscores the enduring impact of gendered occupational terms. Surgeon is one of many genderspecific job titles (like pilot, firefighter, foreman, nurse, and midwife) that conjures up a specific gender stereotype. If the gender of an individual is not typically associated with a given profession, we use statements of exemption such as “female-surgeon” or “male-nurse”, implying an outlier, or inferior member of that profession. I’m using the terms “female-surgeon” and “male-nurse” here because they are the common parlance for those particular professions, even though language of gender would be more appropriate in light of the fact that we’re discussing social roles here, rather than anything to do with biology (that is woman and man, rather than female and male, would be the preferred words) [5]. The gendered nature of occupations is pervasive, particularly in leadership positions in academic medicine where the title “chairman” is germane. The suffix “-man” comes from the Old English word for “person”, which in present-day English has become predominantly masculine [4]. The term “chairman” is under scrutiny as a possible source of gender bias in the current article by Peck and colleagues [10]. Exclusionary language hinders diversity in the workforce and perpetuates gender disparity [6]. This paper found that the gendered term “chairman” is used more frequently in orthopaedics than in many other medical specialties. It is well established that gender diversity in medicine benefits our patients and the organizations in which we work. According to a 2018 report from the Association of American Medical Colleges, “when health care providers have life experience that more closely matches the experience of their patients, patients tend to be more satisfied with their care and to adhere to medical advice. This effect has been seen in studies ... when the demographics of health care providers reflect those of underserved populations” [7]. Furthermore, diverse organizations are more successful—companies in the top quartile for gender diversity are 15% more likely to have returns above the industry mean [12]. Although historically a field dominated bymen, women are now entering medicine in increasing numbers. Since the 1972 enactment of Title IX, the number of women enrolled in US medical schools has drastically increased from 10% in 1970 to more than 50% today [2]. The greatest number of women in medicine are in internal medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology. In some specialties the percentage of women exceeds that of men such as in pediatrics and This CORR Insights is a commentary on the article “Chair Versus Chairman: Does orthopaedics Use the Gendered Term More Than Other Specialties?” by Peck and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1097/CORR. 0000000000000964. The author certifies that neither she, nor any members of her immediate family, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. A. Abdeen MD, FRCSC (✉), Harvard Medical School, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Stoneman 10, Boston, MA 02494 USA, Email: aabdeen@ bidmc.harvard.edu\",\"PeriodicalId\":10465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一个我们很多人都听过的谜语:一位父亲和他的儿子出了车祸。父亲被杀了。儿子被送往医院。就在他被冲进手术室的时候,外科医生说:“我不能做手术。那个男孩是我的儿子!”这怎么可能呢?对我们大多数人来说,外科医生不是男孩的母亲,这一事实凸显了性别职业术语的持久影响。外科医生是众多与性别相关的职位之一(如飞行员、消防员、领班、护士和助产士),这些职位会让人联想到特定的性别刻板印象。如果一个人的性别与特定的职业没有典型的联系,我们使用免责声明,如“女外科医生”或“男护士”,暗示该职业的异常值或劣等成员。我在这里使用“女外科医生”和“男护士”这两个术语,因为它们是这些特定职业的常用说法,尽管性别的语言更合适,因为我们在这里讨论的是社会角色,而不是与生物学有关(也就是说,女性和男性,而不是女性和男性,将是首选的词)[5]。职业的性别本质是普遍存在的,特别是在学术医学的领导职位上,“主席”的头衔是密切相关的。后缀“-man”来自古英语中表示“人”的单词,而在现代英语中,这个词已成为主要的男性词汇[4]。Peck及其同事在当前的文章中对“主席”一词作为性别偏见的可能来源进行了审查[10]。排他性语言阻碍了劳动力的多样性,并使性别差异永久化[6]。本文发现,与许多其他医学专业相比,性别术语“主席”在骨科中的使用频率更高。医学上的性别多样性有利于我们的病人和我们工作的组织,这是众所周知的。根据美国医学院协会2018年的一份报告,“当医疗服务提供者的生活经历与患者的经历更接近时,患者往往对他们的护理更满意,并坚持医疗建议。”这种效应在研究中已经被发现。当卫生保健提供者的人口统计数据反映了那些服务不足的人群时”[7]。此外,多元化的组织更成功——性别多样性排名前四分之一的公司,其回报率高于行业平均水平的可能性要高出15%[12]。尽管历史上这是一个由男性主导的领域,但现在越来越多的女性进入医学领域。自1972年颁布第九章以来,美国医学院的女性入学率从1970年的10%急剧增加到今天的50%以上[2]。从事医学工作的女性人数最多的是内科、儿科和妇产科。在一些专业中,女性的比例超过了男性,比如儿科。这篇CORR Insights文章是对“主席与主席:骨科是否比其他专业更多地使用性别术语?”,可在:DOI: 10.1097/CORR找到。0000000000000964. 提交人证明,她本人及其直系亲属均无任何可能与所提交文章存在利益冲突的商业协会(如咨询公司、股票所有权、股权、专利/许可安排等)。本文仅代表作者个人观点,不代表CORR或骨关节外科医师协会的观点或政策。A. Abdeen医学博士,FRCSC(;),哈佛医学院骨科外科,Beth Israel Deaconess医疗中心,330 Brookline Avenue, Stoneman 10, Boston, MA 02494 USA, Email: aabdeen@bidmc.harvard.edu
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CORR Insights®: Chair Versus Chairman: Does Orthopaedics Use the Gendered Term More Than Other Specialties?
Here’s a riddle many of us have heard: A father and his son are in a car crash. The father is killed. The son is taken to the hospital. Just as he’s rushed to the operating room the surgeon says: “I can’t operate. That boy is my son!” How can this be? The fact that it is not immediately evident to most of us that the surgeon is the boy’s mother, underscores the enduring impact of gendered occupational terms. Surgeon is one of many genderspecific job titles (like pilot, firefighter, foreman, nurse, and midwife) that conjures up a specific gender stereotype. If the gender of an individual is not typically associated with a given profession, we use statements of exemption such as “female-surgeon” or “male-nurse”, implying an outlier, or inferior member of that profession. I’m using the terms “female-surgeon” and “male-nurse” here because they are the common parlance for those particular professions, even though language of gender would be more appropriate in light of the fact that we’re discussing social roles here, rather than anything to do with biology (that is woman and man, rather than female and male, would be the preferred words) [5]. The gendered nature of occupations is pervasive, particularly in leadership positions in academic medicine where the title “chairman” is germane. The suffix “-man” comes from the Old English word for “person”, which in present-day English has become predominantly masculine [4]. The term “chairman” is under scrutiny as a possible source of gender bias in the current article by Peck and colleagues [10]. Exclusionary language hinders diversity in the workforce and perpetuates gender disparity [6]. This paper found that the gendered term “chairman” is used more frequently in orthopaedics than in many other medical specialties. It is well established that gender diversity in medicine benefits our patients and the organizations in which we work. According to a 2018 report from the Association of American Medical Colleges, “when health care providers have life experience that more closely matches the experience of their patients, patients tend to be more satisfied with their care and to adhere to medical advice. This effect has been seen in studies ... when the demographics of health care providers reflect those of underserved populations” [7]. Furthermore, diverse organizations are more successful—companies in the top quartile for gender diversity are 15% more likely to have returns above the industry mean [12]. Although historically a field dominated bymen, women are now entering medicine in increasing numbers. Since the 1972 enactment of Title IX, the number of women enrolled in US medical schools has drastically increased from 10% in 1970 to more than 50% today [2]. The greatest number of women in medicine are in internal medicine, pediatrics, and obstetrics and gynecology. In some specialties the percentage of women exceeds that of men such as in pediatrics and This CORR Insights is a commentary on the article “Chair Versus Chairman: Does orthopaedics Use the Gendered Term More Than Other Specialties?” by Peck and colleagues available at: DOI: 10.1097/CORR. 0000000000000964. The author certifies that neither she, nor any members of her immediate family, have any commercial associations (such as consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. The opinions expressed are those of the writers, and do not reflect the opinion or policy of CORR or The Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons. A. Abdeen MD, FRCSC (✉), Harvard Medical School, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Stoneman 10, Boston, MA 02494 USA, Email: aabdeen@ bidmc.harvard.edu
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信