基于机器学习的激光焊接质量控制几何重构

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
J. Hartung, Andreas Jahn, M. Heizmann
{"title":"基于机器学习的激光焊接质量控制几何重构","authors":"J. Hartung, Andreas Jahn, M. Heizmann","doi":"10.1515/teme-2023-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The increasing use of automated laser welding processes causes high demands on quality control. 2D or 3D sensor technology can be used for data acquisition to monitor the weld quality after laser welding. Compared to a 2D camera image, the 3D height data, e.g. acquired using optical coherence tomography, contains additional relevant information for quality inspection. However, the disadvantages are system complexity, higher costs, and longer acquisition times. Therefore, we compare image-based methods with the quality assessment based on height data. The first method uses feature vectors from grayscale images taken coaxially with the laser beam. The significant advantage is that a camera is often integrated into the laser system, so no additional hardware is required. In the second approach, we use an AI-based single-view 3D reconstruction method. The height profile is reconstructed from a camera image and used for further quality assessment. Thus, we combine the advantages of 2D data acquisition with higher accuracy in evaluating 3D data. In addition, we consider the usually low data availability in the industrial environment in the development of algorithms. We use a training data set with 95 samples and a test data set with 858 samples. The work uses the contracting process of copper wires to produce formed coil windings to illustrate the method. We analyze a data set with different defect types and compare the quality assessment using the height data acquired with OCT, the feature vectors from the camera images, and the reconstructed height data.","PeriodicalId":56086,"journal":{"name":"Tm-Technisches Messen","volume":"30 1","pages":"512 - 521"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning based geometry reconstruction for quality control of laser welding processes\",\"authors\":\"J. Hartung, Andreas Jahn, M. Heizmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/teme-2023-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The increasing use of automated laser welding processes causes high demands on quality control. 2D or 3D sensor technology can be used for data acquisition to monitor the weld quality after laser welding. Compared to a 2D camera image, the 3D height data, e.g. acquired using optical coherence tomography, contains additional relevant information for quality inspection. However, the disadvantages are system complexity, higher costs, and longer acquisition times. Therefore, we compare image-based methods with the quality assessment based on height data. The first method uses feature vectors from grayscale images taken coaxially with the laser beam. The significant advantage is that a camera is often integrated into the laser system, so no additional hardware is required. In the second approach, we use an AI-based single-view 3D reconstruction method. The height profile is reconstructed from a camera image and used for further quality assessment. Thus, we combine the advantages of 2D data acquisition with higher accuracy in evaluating 3D data. In addition, we consider the usually low data availability in the industrial environment in the development of algorithms. We use a training data set with 95 samples and a test data set with 858 samples. The work uses the contracting process of copper wires to produce formed coil windings to illustrate the method. We analyze a data set with different defect types and compare the quality assessment using the height data acquired with OCT, the feature vectors from the camera images, and the reconstructed height data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tm-Technisches Messen\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"512 - 521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tm-Technisches Messen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/teme-2023-0006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tm-Technisches Messen","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/teme-2023-0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着自动化激光焊接工艺的日益普及,对焊接质量的控制提出了更高的要求。采用二维或三维传感器技术进行数据采集,监测激光焊接后的焊缝质量。与2D相机图像相比,使用光学相干层析成像获得的3D高度数据包含了用于质量检查的额外相关信息。然而,缺点是系统复杂、成本高、采集时间长。因此,我们将基于图像的方法与基于高度数据的质量评估方法进行了比较。第一种方法使用与激光束同轴拍摄的灰度图像中的特征向量。显著的优点是,相机通常集成到激光系统,所以不需要额外的硬件。在第二种方法中,我们使用基于人工智能的单视图三维重建方法。从相机图像重建高度轮廓,并用于进一步的质量评估。因此,我们将二维数据采集的优势与更高的精度结合起来评估三维数据。此外,在算法的开发中,我们考虑了工业环境中数据可用性通常较低的问题。我们使用包含95个样本的训练数据集和包含858个样本的测试数据集。本作品以铜线的收缩过程产生成形的线圈绕组来说明该方法。我们分析了具有不同缺陷类型的数据集,并使用OCT获得的高度数据、来自相机图像的特征向量和重建的高度数据来比较质量评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning based geometry reconstruction for quality control of laser welding processes
Abstract The increasing use of automated laser welding processes causes high demands on quality control. 2D or 3D sensor technology can be used for data acquisition to monitor the weld quality after laser welding. Compared to a 2D camera image, the 3D height data, e.g. acquired using optical coherence tomography, contains additional relevant information for quality inspection. However, the disadvantages are system complexity, higher costs, and longer acquisition times. Therefore, we compare image-based methods with the quality assessment based on height data. The first method uses feature vectors from grayscale images taken coaxially with the laser beam. The significant advantage is that a camera is often integrated into the laser system, so no additional hardware is required. In the second approach, we use an AI-based single-view 3D reconstruction method. The height profile is reconstructed from a camera image and used for further quality assessment. Thus, we combine the advantages of 2D data acquisition with higher accuracy in evaluating 3D data. In addition, we consider the usually low data availability in the industrial environment in the development of algorithms. We use a training data set with 95 samples and a test data set with 858 samples. The work uses the contracting process of copper wires to produce formed coil windings to illustrate the method. We analyze a data set with different defect types and compare the quality assessment using the height data acquired with OCT, the feature vectors from the camera images, and the reconstructed height data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tm-Technisches Messen
Tm-Technisches Messen 工程技术-仪器仪表
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal promotes dialogue between the developers of application-oriented sensors, measurement systems, and measurement methods and the manufacturers and measurement technologists who use them. Topics The manufacture and characteristics of new sensors for measurement technology in the industrial sector New measurement methods Hardware and software based processing and analysis of measurement signals to obtain measurement values The outcomes of employing new measurement systems and methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信