{"title":"胸骨切开后纵隔炎的真空辅助封闭治疗:最终或重建的桥梁","authors":"Yasser Elnahas, Ayman Ammar","doi":"10.1016/j.jescts.2018.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Vacuum assisted closure (VAC) system is used to promote granulation tissue formation and hence, wound healing in chronic difficult wounds when all traditional treatment strategies fail. The idea behind the device was introduced in 1997 which is simply putting the wound under continuous and controlled negative suction pressure inducing arteriolar vasodilation and wound stability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>17 patients (with a mean age of 65.8 ± 5.3 years (range 58–79 years) who were diagnosed with poststernotomy mediastinitis after cardiac surgery received VAC system during the course of their treatment. 11patients [64.7%] underwent coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], 3 [17.6%] mitral valve replacement [MVR], 2 [11.7%], aortic valve replacement and 1 [5.8%]) Bental operation. Total operative time ranged between 145 and 300 min with a mean of 216.7 ± 45.5 min. 7 [41.1%] patients required exploration for mediastinal bleeding.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Healing by secondary intention was achieved in 7 [41.2%] patients without the need of any further surgery. In 6 [35.3%] patients, primary closure of the wound in layers could be achieved after discontinuation of the VAC therapy. In the remaining 4 [23.5%] patients, the VAC therapy was considered as a bridge to further reconstruction with pectoral muscle flap. Of the group who received pectoral muscle flap, one [5.88%] patient died.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>VAC therapy can be considered as good alternative to more aggressive surgery that might not be suitable for some patients during certain times of their treatment course.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100843,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 136-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jescts.2018.04.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vacuum assisted closure therapy for poststernotomy mediastinitis: Definitive or bridge to reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Yasser Elnahas, Ayman Ammar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jescts.2018.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Vacuum assisted closure (VAC) system is used to promote granulation tissue formation and hence, wound healing in chronic difficult wounds when all traditional treatment strategies fail. The idea behind the device was introduced in 1997 which is simply putting the wound under continuous and controlled negative suction pressure inducing arteriolar vasodilation and wound stability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>17 patients (with a mean age of 65.8 ± 5.3 years (range 58–79 years) who were diagnosed with poststernotomy mediastinitis after cardiac surgery received VAC system during the course of their treatment. 11patients [64.7%] underwent coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], 3 [17.6%] mitral valve replacement [MVR], 2 [11.7%], aortic valve replacement and 1 [5.8%]) Bental operation. Total operative time ranged between 145 and 300 min with a mean of 216.7 ± 45.5 min. 7 [41.1%] patients required exploration for mediastinal bleeding.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Healing by secondary intention was achieved in 7 [41.2%] patients without the need of any further surgery. In 6 [35.3%] patients, primary closure of the wound in layers could be achieved after discontinuation of the VAC therapy. In the remaining 4 [23.5%] patients, the VAC therapy was considered as a bridge to further reconstruction with pectoral muscle flap. Of the group who received pectoral muscle flap, one [5.88%] patient died.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>VAC therapy can be considered as good alternative to more aggressive surgery that might not be suitable for some patients during certain times of their treatment course.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 136-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jescts.2018.04.001\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110578X18300312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110578X18300312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vacuum assisted closure therapy for poststernotomy mediastinitis: Definitive or bridge to reconstruction
Background
Vacuum assisted closure (VAC) system is used to promote granulation tissue formation and hence, wound healing in chronic difficult wounds when all traditional treatment strategies fail. The idea behind the device was introduced in 1997 which is simply putting the wound under continuous and controlled negative suction pressure inducing arteriolar vasodilation and wound stability.
Methods
17 patients (with a mean age of 65.8 ± 5.3 years (range 58–79 years) who were diagnosed with poststernotomy mediastinitis after cardiac surgery received VAC system during the course of their treatment. 11patients [64.7%] underwent coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], 3 [17.6%] mitral valve replacement [MVR], 2 [11.7%], aortic valve replacement and 1 [5.8%]) Bental operation. Total operative time ranged between 145 and 300 min with a mean of 216.7 ± 45.5 min. 7 [41.1%] patients required exploration for mediastinal bleeding.
Results
Healing by secondary intention was achieved in 7 [41.2%] patients without the need of any further surgery. In 6 [35.3%] patients, primary closure of the wound in layers could be achieved after discontinuation of the VAC therapy. In the remaining 4 [23.5%] patients, the VAC therapy was considered as a bridge to further reconstruction with pectoral muscle flap. Of the group who received pectoral muscle flap, one [5.88%] patient died.
Conclusions
VAC therapy can be considered as good alternative to more aggressive surgery that might not be suitable for some patients during certain times of their treatment course.