作为问责机制的股东权力:2017年《股东权利指令》及其强化股东权利的挑战

Q3 Social Sciences
R. Savva
{"title":"作为问责机制的股东权力:2017年《股东权利指令》及其强化股东权利的挑战","authors":"R. Savva","doi":"10.22598/IELE.2018.5.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2017 Shareholder Rights Directive has paved the way towards adopting a model where shareholder power can be used as an accountability mechanism in European corporate governance by amending the 2007 Shareholder Rights Directive to encourage active shareholder participation. This model can ensure good governance practices, but practical implications can challenge its effectiveness. This paper seeks to outline the merits and the challenges this model must overcome to be effective. The Directive manifests EU corporate law’s adoption of a model where shareholders power is used to confer accountability in corporate governance. Despite the model’s merits, there are implications that may impede its effectiveness. Firstly, several problems related to agency capitalism and the establishment of collective action, such as participation costs, disclosure of information; free-riding and incentives of exercising shareholder rights can significantly affect proper shareholder engagement. Secondly, another implication is found on shareholder short-termism and the basis on which shareholder power is to be exercised to confer accountability. Though the Directive addresses these issues to some extent, the appropriate consideration of all issues of these implications is paramount. As such, the Directive is only the starting point towards the facilitation of shareholder power act as an accountability mechanism.","PeriodicalId":52280,"journal":{"name":"InterEULawEast","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SHAREHOLDER POWER AS AN ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM: THE 2017 SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS DIRECTIVE AND THE CHALLENGES TOWARDS ENHANCING SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS\",\"authors\":\"R. Savva\",\"doi\":\"10.22598/IELE.2018.5.2.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2017 Shareholder Rights Directive has paved the way towards adopting a model where shareholder power can be used as an accountability mechanism in European corporate governance by amending the 2007 Shareholder Rights Directive to encourage active shareholder participation. This model can ensure good governance practices, but practical implications can challenge its effectiveness. This paper seeks to outline the merits and the challenges this model must overcome to be effective. The Directive manifests EU corporate law’s adoption of a model where shareholders power is used to confer accountability in corporate governance. Despite the model’s merits, there are implications that may impede its effectiveness. Firstly, several problems related to agency capitalism and the establishment of collective action, such as participation costs, disclosure of information; free-riding and incentives of exercising shareholder rights can significantly affect proper shareholder engagement. Secondly, another implication is found on shareholder short-termism and the basis on which shareholder power is to be exercised to confer accountability. Though the Directive addresses these issues to some extent, the appropriate consideration of all issues of these implications is paramount. As such, the Directive is only the starting point towards the facilitation of shareholder power act as an accountability mechanism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"InterEULawEast\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"InterEULawEast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22598/IELE.2018.5.2.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterEULawEast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22598/IELE.2018.5.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2017年的《股东权利指令》修订了2007年的《股东权利指令》,鼓励股东积极参与,为采用股东权力作为欧洲公司治理问责机制的模式铺平了道路。该模型可以确保良好的治理实践,但实际影响可能会挑战其有效性。本文试图概述这种模式的优点和必须克服的挑战是有效的。该指令表明,欧盟公司法采用了一种模式,即利用股东权力赋予公司治理中的问责制。尽管该模型有其优点,但也存在可能阻碍其有效性的暗示。首先,分析了代理资本主义与集体行动建立相关的几个问题,如参与成本、信息披露等;搭便车和激励股东权利的行使可以显著影响适当的股东参与。其次,股东的短期主义和行使股东权力以赋予问责制的基础是另一个含义。虽然该指令在一定程度上解决了这些问题,但对这些影响的所有问题的适当考虑是至关重要的。因此,该指令只是促进股东权力作为问责机制的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SHAREHOLDER POWER AS AN ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISM: THE 2017 SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS DIRECTIVE AND THE CHALLENGES TOWARDS ENHANCING SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS
The 2017 Shareholder Rights Directive has paved the way towards adopting a model where shareholder power can be used as an accountability mechanism in European corporate governance by amending the 2007 Shareholder Rights Directive to encourage active shareholder participation. This model can ensure good governance practices, but practical implications can challenge its effectiveness. This paper seeks to outline the merits and the challenges this model must overcome to be effective. The Directive manifests EU corporate law’s adoption of a model where shareholders power is used to confer accountability in corporate governance. Despite the model’s merits, there are implications that may impede its effectiveness. Firstly, several problems related to agency capitalism and the establishment of collective action, such as participation costs, disclosure of information; free-riding and incentives of exercising shareholder rights can significantly affect proper shareholder engagement. Secondly, another implication is found on shareholder short-termism and the basis on which shareholder power is to be exercised to confer accountability. Though the Directive addresses these issues to some extent, the appropriate consideration of all issues of these implications is paramount. As such, the Directive is only the starting point towards the facilitation of shareholder power act as an accountability mechanism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
InterEULawEast
InterEULawEast Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信