发达国家、发展中国家和新兴国家波动率和均值回归的比较

IF 1.8 Q2 ECONOMICS
Tazeen Arsalan, B. Chishty, Shagufta Ghouri, N. Ansari
{"title":"发达国家、发展中国家和新兴国家波动率和均值回归的比较","authors":"Tazeen Arsalan, B. Chishty, Shagufta Ghouri, N. Ansari","doi":"10.1108/jeas-01-2022-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research paper aims to analyze the stock exchanges of developed, emerging and developing countries to investigate the volatility in stock markets and to evaluate the rate of mean reversion.Design/methodology/approachThe stock exchanges included in the research are NASDAQ, Tokyo stock exchange, Shanghai stock exchange, Bombay stock exchange, Karachi stock exchange and Jakarta stock exchange. Secondary daily data from Bloomberg are used to conduct the research for the period from January 2011 to December 2018. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) (1,1) model was applied to examine volatility and the half-life formula was used to calculate mean reversion in days.FindingsThe research concluded that all the stock exchanges included in the research satisfy the assumptions of mean reversion. Developing countries have the lowest volatility while emerging countries have the highest volatility which means that the rate of mean reversion is fastest in developing countries and slowest in emerging countries.Research limitations/implicationsFuture studies can determine the reasons for fastest rate of mean reversion in developing countries and slowest rate of mean reversion in emerging countries.Practical implicationsDeveloping countries show the lowest mean reversion in days while the emerging countries show the highest mean reversion in days indicating that developing countries take less time to revert to their mean position.Originality/valueThe majority of previous studies on univariate volatility models are mostly on applications of the models. Only a few researchers have taken the robustness of the models into account when applying them in emerging countries and not in developed, developing and emerging countries in one place. This makes the current study unique and more rigorous.","PeriodicalId":44018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of volatility and mean reversion among developed, developing and emerging countries\",\"authors\":\"Tazeen Arsalan, B. Chishty, Shagufta Ghouri, N. Ansari\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jeas-01-2022-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis research paper aims to analyze the stock exchanges of developed, emerging and developing countries to investigate the volatility in stock markets and to evaluate the rate of mean reversion.Design/methodology/approachThe stock exchanges included in the research are NASDAQ, Tokyo stock exchange, Shanghai stock exchange, Bombay stock exchange, Karachi stock exchange and Jakarta stock exchange. Secondary daily data from Bloomberg are used to conduct the research for the period from January 2011 to December 2018. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) (1,1) model was applied to examine volatility and the half-life formula was used to calculate mean reversion in days.FindingsThe research concluded that all the stock exchanges included in the research satisfy the assumptions of mean reversion. Developing countries have the lowest volatility while emerging countries have the highest volatility which means that the rate of mean reversion is fastest in developing countries and slowest in emerging countries.Research limitations/implicationsFuture studies can determine the reasons for fastest rate of mean reversion in developing countries and slowest rate of mean reversion in emerging countries.Practical implicationsDeveloping countries show the lowest mean reversion in days while the emerging countries show the highest mean reversion in days indicating that developing countries take less time to revert to their mean position.Originality/valueThe majority of previous studies on univariate volatility models are mostly on applications of the models. Only a few researchers have taken the robustness of the models into account when applying them in emerging countries and not in developed, developing and emerging countries in one place. This makes the current study unique and more rigorous.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-01-2022-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-01-2022-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文旨在分析发达国家、新兴国家和发展中国家的证券交易所,以调查股票市场的波动率并评估均值回归率。本研究涉及的证券交易所包括纳斯达克、东京证券交易所、上海证券交易所、孟买证券交易所、卡拉奇证券交易所和雅加达证券交易所。该研究使用了彭博社2011年1月至2018年12月期间的二手每日数据。采用广义自回归条件异方差(GARCH)(1,1)模型检验波动率,采用半衰期公式计算平均天回归。研究结果表明,纳入研究的所有证券交易所都满足均值回归的假设。发展中国家的波动率最低,而新兴国家的波动率最高,这意味着发展中国家的均值回归速度最快,新兴国家的均值回归速度最慢。未来的研究可以确定发展中国家平均回归速度最快而新兴国家平均回归速度最慢的原因。实际意义发展中国家的平均回归天数最低,而新兴国家的平均回归天数最高,这表明发展中国家恢复到平均位置所需的时间更短。以往对单变量波动率模型的研究大多集中在模型的应用上。只有少数研究人员在将模型应用于新兴国家而不是发达国家、发展中国家和新兴国家时考虑到了模型的稳健性。这使得当前的研究更加独特和严谨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of volatility and mean reversion among developed, developing and emerging countries
PurposeThis research paper aims to analyze the stock exchanges of developed, emerging and developing countries to investigate the volatility in stock markets and to evaluate the rate of mean reversion.Design/methodology/approachThe stock exchanges included in the research are NASDAQ, Tokyo stock exchange, Shanghai stock exchange, Bombay stock exchange, Karachi stock exchange and Jakarta stock exchange. Secondary daily data from Bloomberg are used to conduct the research for the period from January 2011 to December 2018. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) (1,1) model was applied to examine volatility and the half-life formula was used to calculate mean reversion in days.FindingsThe research concluded that all the stock exchanges included in the research satisfy the assumptions of mean reversion. Developing countries have the lowest volatility while emerging countries have the highest volatility which means that the rate of mean reversion is fastest in developing countries and slowest in emerging countries.Research limitations/implicationsFuture studies can determine the reasons for fastest rate of mean reversion in developing countries and slowest rate of mean reversion in emerging countries.Practical implicationsDeveloping countries show the lowest mean reversion in days while the emerging countries show the highest mean reversion in days indicating that developing countries take less time to revert to their mean position.Originality/valueThe majority of previous studies on univariate volatility models are mostly on applications of the models. Only a few researchers have taken the robustness of the models into account when applying them in emerging countries and not in developed, developing and emerging countries in one place. This makes the current study unique and more rigorous.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
83
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信