埃尔比勒里兹加里医院感染伤口中细菌病原体的分类及其抗生素耐药性分析

IF 1.2 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Ahmed A. Al-Naqshbandi, Hedy A. Hassan, M. Chawsheen, Haval H. Abdul Qader
{"title":"埃尔比勒里兹加里医院感染伤口中细菌病原体的分类及其抗生素耐药性分析","authors":"Ahmed A. Al-Naqshbandi, Hedy A. Hassan, M. Chawsheen, Haval H. Abdul Qader","doi":"10.14500/aro.10864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wound infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria can extend a patients’ debility and increase the expense of treatment in the long term; therefore, careful management of patients with wound infections is necessary to avoid complications. The usage of antimicrobial agent is a major factor in resistance development. This study aims to understand the causes of wound infections, as well as the criteria for diagnosing them for more sensible antibiotic prescribing. Samples from 269 wound patients were collected, and cultured for bacterial growth. Gram stain technique, bacterial identification via VITEK 2 compact system were investigated in this study. Gram negative bacteria accounted for 59.15% of the total isolates, while pathogenic gram positive bacteria accounted for 40.85% of total isolates. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the dominant pathogenic gram negative bacteria in wounds, while Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis are the dominant pathogenic gram positive bacteria. Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed 100% resistance to the majority of antibiotic tested, including Ampicillin, Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid, Aztreona, Ceftriaxone, and others. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis are 100% resistant to Ampicillin, Ceftriaxone, and Cefotaxime. For more efficient antibiotic prescriptions, the causative microorganisms, and their current susceptibility patterns need to be mandated for testing before prescribing any antibiotics to patients. Prescriptions are frequently based solely on general information about the antibiotic's function, rather than on individual response variation to the pathogen and the antibiotic. Particularly when the common pathogens in this study show multidrug resistance in wounds.","PeriodicalId":8398,"journal":{"name":"ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Categorization of Bacterial Pathogens Present in Infected Wounds and their Antibiotic Resistance Profile Recovered from Patients Attending Rizgary Hospital-Erbil\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed A. Al-Naqshbandi, Hedy A. Hassan, M. Chawsheen, Haval H. Abdul Qader\",\"doi\":\"10.14500/aro.10864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Wound infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria can extend a patients’ debility and increase the expense of treatment in the long term; therefore, careful management of patients with wound infections is necessary to avoid complications. The usage of antimicrobial agent is a major factor in resistance development. This study aims to understand the causes of wound infections, as well as the criteria for diagnosing them for more sensible antibiotic prescribing. Samples from 269 wound patients were collected, and cultured for bacterial growth. Gram stain technique, bacterial identification via VITEK 2 compact system were investigated in this study. Gram negative bacteria accounted for 59.15% of the total isolates, while pathogenic gram positive bacteria accounted for 40.85% of total isolates. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the dominant pathogenic gram negative bacteria in wounds, while Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis are the dominant pathogenic gram positive bacteria. Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed 100% resistance to the majority of antibiotic tested, including Ampicillin, Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid, Aztreona, Ceftriaxone, and others. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis are 100% resistant to Ampicillin, Ceftriaxone, and Cefotaxime. For more efficient antibiotic prescriptions, the causative microorganisms, and their current susceptibility patterns need to be mandated for testing before prescribing any antibiotics to patients. Prescriptions are frequently based solely on general information about the antibiotic's function, rather than on individual response variation to the pathogen and the antibiotic. Particularly when the common pathogens in this study show multidrug resistance in wounds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14500/aro.10864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14500/aro.10864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

抗生素耐药菌的伤口感染可延长患者的虚弱期,并长期增加治疗费用;因此,对伤口感染患者的谨慎处理是必要的,以避免并发症。抗菌药物的使用是产生耐药性的一个主要因素。本研究旨在了解伤口感染的原因,以及诊断它们的标准,以便更合理地开抗生素处方。收集269例伤口患者的样本,培养细菌生长。本研究采用革兰氏染色法和VITEK 2紧凑系统进行细菌鉴定。革兰氏阴性菌占总分离株的59.15%,致病性革兰氏阳性菌占总分离株的40.85%。伤口致病性革兰氏阴性菌以大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌为主,革兰氏阳性菌以金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌为主。铜绿假单胞菌对大多数测试的抗生素显示100%耐药,包括氨苄西林、阿莫西林/克拉维酸、氨曲那、头孢曲松等。金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌对氨苄西林、头孢曲松和头孢噻肟100%耐药。为了更有效地开具抗生素处方,在给患者开任何抗生素之前,需要强制检测致病微生物及其当前的敏感性模式。处方常常仅仅基于抗生素功能的一般信息,而不是个体对病原体和抗生素的反应差异。特别是当本研究中常见的病原体在伤口中显示出多药耐药性时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Categorization of Bacterial Pathogens Present in Infected Wounds and their Antibiotic Resistance Profile Recovered from Patients Attending Rizgary Hospital-Erbil
Wound infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria can extend a patients’ debility and increase the expense of treatment in the long term; therefore, careful management of patients with wound infections is necessary to avoid complications. The usage of antimicrobial agent is a major factor in resistance development. This study aims to understand the causes of wound infections, as well as the criteria for diagnosing them for more sensible antibiotic prescribing. Samples from 269 wound patients were collected, and cultured for bacterial growth. Gram stain technique, bacterial identification via VITEK 2 compact system were investigated in this study. Gram negative bacteria accounted for 59.15% of the total isolates, while pathogenic gram positive bacteria accounted for 40.85% of total isolates. Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the dominant pathogenic gram negative bacteria in wounds, while Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis are the dominant pathogenic gram positive bacteria. Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed 100% resistance to the majority of antibiotic tested, including Ampicillin, Amoxicillin/Clavulanic Acid, Aztreona, Ceftriaxone, and others. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis are 100% resistant to Ampicillin, Ceftriaxone, and Cefotaxime. For more efficient antibiotic prescriptions, the causative microorganisms, and their current susceptibility patterns need to be mandated for testing before prescribing any antibiotics to patients. Prescriptions are frequently based solely on general information about the antibiotic's function, rather than on individual response variation to the pathogen and the antibiotic. Particularly when the common pathogens in this study show multidrug resistance in wounds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY
ARO-THE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF KOYA UNIVERSITY MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
33
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信